Background and purpose: We aim to retrospectively investigate whether reducing GTV to high-risk CTV margin will significantly reduce acute and late toxicity without jeopardizing outcome in head-and... Show moreBackground and purpose: We aim to retrospectively investigate whether reducing GTV to high-risk CTV margin will significantly reduce acute and late toxicity without jeopardizing outcome in head-and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with definitive (chemo)radiation. Materials and methods: Between April 2015 and April 2019, 155 consecutive patients were treated with GTV to high-risk CTV margin of 10 mm and subsequently another 155 patients with 6 mm margin. The CTV-PTV margin was 3 mm for both groups. All patients were treated with volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image-guidance using cone-beam CT. End points of the study were acute and late toxicity and oncologic outcomes. Results: Overall acute grade 3 toxicity was significantly lower in 6 mm, compared to 10 mm group (48% vs. 67%, respectively, p < 0.01). The same was true for acute grade 3 mucositis (18% vs. 34%, p < 0.01) and grade > 2 dysphagia (67% vs. 85%, p < 0.01). Also feeding tube-dependency at the end of treatment (25% vs. 37%, p = 0.02), at 3 months (12% and 25%, p < 0.01), and at 6 months (6% and 15%, p = 0.01) was significantly less in 6 mm group. The incidence of late grade 2 xerostomia was also significantly lower in the 6 mm group (32% vs. 50%, p < 0.01). The 2-year rates of loco-regional control, disease-free and overall survival were 78.7% vs. 73.1%, 70.6% vs. 61.4%, and 83.2% vs. 74.4% (p > 0.05, all). Conclusion: The first study reporting on reduction of GTV to high-risk CTV margin from 10 to 6 mm showed significant reduction of the incidence and severity of radiation-related toxicity without reducing local-regional control and survival. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 162 (2021) 170-177 Show less
Heukelom, J.; Navran, A.; Gouw, Z.A.R.; Tesselaar, M.E.; Zuur, C.L.; Werkhoven, E. van; ... ; Al-Mamgani, A. 2019
Objective The aim of the current study was to determine the incidence of organ function preservation failure (OFPF) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated by (chemo... Show moreObjective The aim of the current study was to determine the incidence of organ function preservation failure (OFPF) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated by (chemo)radiotherapy and to identify its risk factors. Study Design Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting Tertiary cancer care center. Subjects and Methods A single-center retrospective cohort analysis was done (n = 703) in which OFPF after (chemo)radiotherapy was assessed. OFPF was defined as local failure or pure functional failure in the absence of local failure because of major surgical intervention (total laryngectomy, commando resection, permanent tracheostomy) or feeding tube dependence >2 years. Results OFPF occurred in 153 patients (21.8%). Reasons for OFPF were local failure in 103 patients (14.6%) and functional failure in 50 patients (7.2%). Evidence of functional failure included need for total laryngectomy (n = 9, 1.3%), commando resection (n = 2, 0.3%), permanent tracheostomy (n = 16, 2.3%), and/or long-term feeding tube for functional reasons (n = 23, 3.3%). In a Cox proportional hazards model, OFPF was worse for patients with T4 tumors (hazard ratio [HR] <0.5 and P < .001 for all other stages), for laryngeal vs oropharyngeal cancer (HR, 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.79, P = .005, hypopharyngeal not significant), and for smokers (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.10-2.56, P = .015). Exploratory multivariate analysis by tumor site showed that T4 tumor and pretreatment tracheostomy were the strongest predictive factors for OFPF in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma while T4 tumor and smoking were predictive for poor OFPF in oropharyngeal carcinoma. Conclusion This work shows a detrimental effect of smoking on functional outcomes after (chemo-)radiotherapy for HNSCC. Moreover, T4 tumor, laryngeal subsite, and pretreatment tracheostomy are strong predictors of OFPF. Show less
Mestdagh, P.D.D.; Werkhoven, E. van; Navran, A.; Boer, J.P. de; Schreuder, W.H.; Vogel, W.V.; Al-Mamgani, A. 2019
Background: The vast majority of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) routinely undergo elective nodal irradiation (ENI) to both sides of the neck. Little is known about the... Show moreBackground: The vast majority of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) routinely undergo elective nodal irradiation (ENI) to both sides of the neck. Little is known about the extent to which bilateral ENI prevents regional failure (RF) and contralateral RF (cRF) in particular, while such knowledge is necessary to evaluate the results of more selective approaches like unilateral ENI. We investigated the rate and pattern of RF after bilateral ENI, the rate of cRF in the electively irradiated contralateral neck, and tried to identify risk factors for development of cRF.Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of 605 patients with T1-4N0-3 HNSCC treated between 2008 and 2017 with primary (chemo) radiation and bilateral ENI.Results: Median follow-up was 43 months (range 1.4-126). Three-year cumulative incidence of RF was 12.7%. Three-year cumulative incidences of ipsilateral RF (iRF) and cRF were 10.6% and 2.8%, respectively. All cRF occurred within the electively treated volume. Salvage treatment was possible in 65% and 59% of patients with iRF and cRF, respectively (p = 0.746). The 3-year overall survival rates after RF in patients with iRF and cRF were 27.4% and 41.2%, respectively (p = 0.713). Three-year cancer-specific survival rates were 31.6% and 48.1%, respectively (p = 0.634). In multivariate analysis, no significant predictive factors were identified for cRF after bilateral ENI.Conclusion: Contralateral regional failure is rare, but still occurs in 2.8% of patients treated with bilateral ENI. The possibilities for salvage treatment, the rates of overall survival and cancer-specific survival were comparable to patients with iRF. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. Show less
