Terrestrial ecosystems strongly determine the exchange of carbon, water and energy between thebiosphere and atmosphere. These exchanges are influenced by environmental conditions (e.g.,... Show moreTerrestrial ecosystems strongly determine the exchange of carbon, water and energy between thebiosphere and atmosphere. These exchanges are influenced by environmental conditions (e.g., localmeteorology, soils), but generally mediated by organisms. Often, mathematical descriptions of theseprocesses are implemented in terrestrial biosphere models. Model implementations of this kind shouldbe evaluated by empirical analyses of relationships between observed patterns of ecosystem function-ing, vegetation structure, plant traits, and environmental conditions. However, the question of how todescribe the imprint of plants on ecosystem functioning based on observations has not yet been systemat-ically investigated. One approach might be to identify and quantify functional attributes or responsivenessof ecosystems (often very short-term in nature) that contribute to the long-term (i.e., annual but alsoseasonal or daily) metrics commonly in use. Here we define these patterns as “ecosystem functional prop-erties”, or EFPs. Such as the ecosystem capacity of carbon assimilation or the maximum light use efficiencyof an ecosystem. While EFPs should be directly derivable from flux measurements at the ecosystem level,we posit that these inherently include the influence of specific plant traits and their local heterogeneity.We present different options of upscaling in situ measured plant traits to the ecosystem level (ecosystemvegetation properties – EVPs) and provide examples of empirical analyses on plants’ imprint on ecosys-tem functioning by combining in situ measured plant traits and ecosystem flux measurements. Finally,we discuss how recent advances in remote sensing contribute to this framework. Show less
