Aim The aim of this study was to assess the resuscitators' opinions of the usefulness and clinical value of using a respiratory function monitor (RFM) when resuscitating extremely preterm infants... Show moreAim The aim of this study was to assess the resuscitators' opinions of the usefulness and clinical value of using a respiratory function monitor (RFM) when resuscitating extremely preterm infants with positive pressure ventilation. Methods The link to an online survey was sent to 106 resuscitators from six countries who were involved in a multicentre trial that compared the percentage of inflations within a predefined target range with and without the RFM. The resuscitators were asked to assess the usefulness and clinical value of the RFM. The survey was online for 4 months after the trial ended in May 2019. Results The survey was completed by 74 (70%) resuscitators of which 99% considered the RFM to be helpful during neonatal resuscitation and 92% indicated that it influenced their decision-making. The majority (76%) indicated that using the RFM improved their practice and made resuscitation more effective, even when the RFM was not available. Inadequate training was the key issue that limited the effectiveness of the RFM: 45% felt insufficiently trained, and 78% felt more training in using and interpreting the RFM would have been beneficial. Conclusion Resuscitators considered the RFM to be helpful to guide neonatal resuscitation, but sufficient training was required to achieve the maximum benefit. Show less
Aim: To determine whether the use of a respiratory function monitor (RFM) during PPV of extremely preterm infants at birth, compared with no RFM, leads to an increase in percentage of inflations... Show moreAim: To determine whether the use of a respiratory function monitor (RFM) during PPV of extremely preterm infants at birth, compared with no RFM, leads to an increase in percentage of inflations with an expiratory tidal volume (Vte) within a predefined target range.Methods: Unmasked, randomised clinical trial conducted October 2013 - May 2019 in 7 neonatal intensive care units in 6 countries. Very preterm infants (24-27 weeks of gestation) receiving PPV at birth were randomised to have a RFM screen visible or not. The primary outcome was the median proportion of inflations during manual PPV (face mask or intubated) within the target range (Vte 4-8 mL/kg). There were 42 other prespecified monitor measurements and clinical outcomes.Results: Among 288 infants randomised (median (IQR) gestational age 26(+2) (25(+3)-27(+1)) weeks), a total number of 51,352 inflations were analysed. The median (IQR) percentage of inflations within the target range in the RFM visible group was 30.0 (18.0-42.2)% vs 30.2 (14.8-43.1)% in the RFM non-visible group (p = 0.721). There were no dierences in other respiratory function measurements, oxygen saturation, heart rate or FiO(2). There were no dierences in clinical outcomes, except for the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage (all grades) and/or cystic periventricular leukomalacia (visible RFM: 26.7% vs non-visible RFM: 39.0%; RR 0.71 (0.68-0.97); p = 0.028).Conclusion: In very preterm infants receiving PPV at birth, the use of a RFM, compared to no RFM as guidance for tidal volume delivery, did not increase the percentage of inflations in a predefined target range. Show less
Objectives To evaluate mask technique during simulated neonatal resuscitation and test the effectiveness of training in optimal mask handling. Study design Seventy participants (consultants,... Show moreObjectives To evaluate mask technique during simulated neonatal resuscitation and test the effectiveness of training in optimal mask handling. Study design Seventy participants (consultants, registrars and nurses) from neonatal units were asked to administer positive pressure ventilation at a flow of 8 l/min and a frequency of 40-60/min to a modified leak free, term newborn manikin (lung compliance 0.5 ml/cm H2O) using a Neopuff T-piece device. Recordings were made (1) before training, (2) after training in mask handling and (3) 3 weeks later. Leak was calculated. Obstruction (tidal volume <60% of optimal tidal volume) and severe obstruction (<30% of optimal tidal volume) were calculated when leak was minimal. Results For the 70 participants, median (IQR) leak was 71% (32-95%) before training, 10% (5-37%) directly after training and 15% (4-33%) 3 weeks later (p<0.001). When leak was minimal, gas flow obstruction was observed before, directly after training and 3 weeks later in 46%, 42% and 37% of inflations, respectively. Severe obstruction did not occur. Conclusions Mask ventilation during simulated neonatal resuscitation was often hampered by large leaks at the face mask. Moderate airway obstruction occurred frequently when effort was taken to minimise leak. Training in mask ventilation reduced mask leak but should also focus on preventing airway obstruction. Show less
OBJECTIVE: Neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend techniques to minimize heat loss in the delivery room. The use of humidified and heated gas is standard of care for preterm infants who need... Show moreOBJECTIVE: Neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend techniques to minimize heat loss in the delivery room. The use of humidified and heated gas is standard of care for preterm infants who need respiratory support in the NICU, but international resuscitation guidelines do not stipulate use of this therapy during stabilization at birth. We aimed to investigate the effect of humidified and heated gas on admission temperature in preterm infants who require respiratory support at birth. METHODS: Two cohorts of very preterm infants born at <= 32 weeks' gestational age in the Leiden University Medical Center were compared prospectively before (the "cold" cohort) and after (the "heated" cohort) introduction of the use of heated and humidified gas during respiratory support at birth (continuous positive airway pressure or intubation). The primary outcome was the infant's rectal temperature at admission in the NICU. RESULTS: There was a difference in the mean (SD) rectal temperature between the cold and heated cohorts (35.9 [0.6] vs 36.4 [0.6], respectively; P < .0001). Normothermia (36.5 degrees C-37.5 degrees C) occurred less often in the cold cohort than in the heated cohort (12% vs 43%; P < .0001). There was no difference in occurrence of mild hypothermia (36.0 degrees C-36.4 degrees C) between groups (33% vs 35%; not significant). Moderate hypothermia (<36.0 degrees C) occurred more often in the cold cohort (53% vs 19%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of heated and humidified air during respiratory support in very preterm infants just after birth reduced the postnatal decrease in temperature. Heating and humidifying the gas during stabilization merits additional investigation. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e1427-e1432 Show less
