Purpose: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) recommendations differ between the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2019 European Society of... Show morePurpose: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) recommendations differ between the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (<70 vs. < 55 mg/dl, respectively). In the DA VINCI study, residual cardiovascular risk was predicted in ASCVD patients. The extent to which relative and absolute risk might be lowered by achieving ACC/AHA versus ESC/EAS LDL-C recommended approaches was simulated. Methods: DA VINCI was a cross-sectional observational study of patients prescribed lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) across 18 European countries. Ten-year cardiovascular risk (CVR) was predicted among ASCVD patients receiving stabilized LLT. For patients with LDL-C >= 70 mg/dl, the absolute LDL-C reduction required to achieve an LDL-C of < 70 or <55 mg/dl (LDL-C of 69 or 54 mg/dl, respectively) was calculated. Relative and absolute risk reductions (RRRs and ARRs) were simulated. Results: Of the 2039 patients, 61% did not achieve LDL-C <70 mg/dl. For patients with LDL-C >= 70 mg/dl, median (interquartile range) baseline LDL-C and 10-year CVR were 93 (81-115) mg/dl and 32% (25-43%), respectively. Median LDL-C reductions of 24 (12-46) and 39 (27-91) mg/dl were needed to achieve an LDL-C of 69 and 54 mg/dl, respectively. Attaining ACC/AHA or ESC/EAS goals resulted in simulated RRRs of 14% (7-25%) and 22% (15-32%), respectively, and ARRs of 4% (2-7%) and 6% (4-9%), respectively. Conclusion: In ASCVD patients, achieving ESC/EAS LDL-C goals could result in a 2% additional ARR over 10 years versus the ACC/AHA approach. Show less
Ray, K.K.; Molemans, B.; Schoonen, W.M.; Giovas, P.; Bray, S.; Kiru, G.; ... ; VINCI study da 2021
Aims To provide contemporary data on the implementation of European guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) across different settings and populations and how this impacts low... Show moreAims To provide contemporary data on the implementation of European guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) across different settings and populations and how this impacts low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement.Methods and results An 18 country, cross-sectional, observational study of patients prescribed LLT for primary or secondary prevention in primary or secondary care across Europe. Between June 2017 and November 2018, data were collected at a single visit, including LLT in the preceding 12 months and most recent LDL-C. Primary outcome was the achievement of risk-based 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) LDL-C goal while receiving stabilized LLT; 2019 goal achievement was also assessed. Overall, 5888 patients (3000 primary and 2888 secondary prevention patients) were enrolled; 54% [95% confidence interval (CI) 52-56] achieved their risk-based 2016 goal and 33% (95% CI 32-35) achieved their risk-based 2019 goal. High-intensity statin monotherapy was used in 20% and 38% of very high-risk primary and secondary prevention patients, respectively. Corresponding 2016 goal attainment was 22% and 45% (17% and 22% for 2019 goals) for very high-risk primary and secondary prevention patients, respectively. Use of moderate-high-intensity statins in combination with ezetimibe (9%), or any LLT with PCSK9 inhibitors (1%), was low; corresponding 2016 and 2019 goal attainment was 53% and 20% (ezetimibe combination), and 67% and 58% (PCSK9i combination).Conclusion Gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice for lipid management across Europe persist, which will be exacerbated by the 2019 guidelines. Even with optimized statins, greater utilization of non-statin LLT is likely needed to reduce these gaps for patients at highest risk. Show less
Background and aims: Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are at very high risk for recurrent events and mortality, despite the availability of effective pharmacological approaches. Aim of... Show moreBackground and aims: Post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are at very high risk for recurrent events and mortality, despite the availability of effective pharmacological approaches. Aim of this survey was to evaluate the compliance to ESC/EAS guidelines during the management of ACS patients and the effectiveness of secondary prevention in seven European countries.Methods: By means of an online questionnaire, data on 2775 ACS patients (either acute case or follow-up patients) were collected, including data on lipid profile, medications, follow-up visit planning, screening for familial hypercholesterolemia.Results: Lipid profiles were obtained for 91% of ACS patients in the acute phase, mostly within the first day of hospitalization (73%). During hospitalization, 93% of the patients received a lipid-lowering treatment; at discharge, only 66% of the patients received a high intensity statin therapy. At the first follow-up, most of the patients (77.6%) had LDL-C 70 mg/dL; among them, 41% had no change in their lipid-lowering therapies. Similar data were obtained during the second follow-up visit. The analysis of a subgroup of patients with at least 2 follow-up visits and known LDL-C levels showed that the percentage of patients at goal increased from 9% to 32%, and patients with LDL-C <100 mg/dL raised from 23% to 72%. Among acute cases, 44 were admitted with a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH); only 18% of the remaining patients were screened for FH.Conclusions: Contemporary lipid management of very high CV risk patients is sub-optimal despite available treatments. Greater efforts are warranted to optimize cardiovascular prevention.(c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Show less
Rodriguez-Calvo, R.; Girona, J.; Rodriguez, M.; Samino, S.; Barroso, E.; Gonzalo-Calvo, D. de; ... ; Masana, L. 2019
Objective: Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) is an intracellular lipid chaperone involved in the crosstalk between adipose and peripheral tissues, and it contributes to widespread insulin... Show moreObjective: Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) is an intracellular lipid chaperone involved in the crosstalk between adipose and peripheral tissues, and it contributes to widespread insulin resistance in cells, including cardiac cells. However, the role of this adipokine in regulating cardiac metabolism and myocardial neutral lipid content in patients with type 2 diabetes has not been elucidated.Methods: The impact of circulating FABP4 on the cardiac neutral lipid content was measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Additionally, circulating FABP4 and the cardiac triglyceride content were analysed in high-fat diet (FIFD)-fed mice, and the impact of the exogenous FABP4 was explored in HL-1 cardiac cells.Results: Serum FABP4 levels were higher in type 2 diabetic patients compared to healthy individuals. Circulating FABP4 levels were associated with myocardial neutral lipid content in type 2 diabetic patients. In FIFD-fed mice, both serum FABP4 and myocardial triglyceride content were increased. In FABP4-challenged HL-1 cells. extracellular FABP4 increased intracellular lipid accumulation, which led to impairment of the insulin-signalling pathway and reduced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. However, these effects were partially reversed by FABP4 inhibition with BM5309403. which attenuated the intracellular lipid content and improved insulin signalling and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake.Conclusions: Taken together, our results identify FABP4 as a molecule involved in diabeticllipid-induced cardiomyopathy and indicate that this molecule may be an emerging biomarker for diabetic cardiomyopathy-related disturbances, such as myocardial neutral lipid accumulation. Additionally, FABP4 inhibition may be a potential therapeutic target for metabolic-related cardiac dysfunctions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Show less
Background Whether triglyceride-mediated pathways are causally relevant to coronary heart disease is uncertain. We studied a genetic variant that regulates triglyceride concentration to help judge... Show moreBackground Whether triglyceride-mediated pathways are causally relevant to coronary heart disease is uncertain. We studied a genetic variant that regulates triglyceride concentration to help judge likelihood of causality. Methods We assessed the -1131T>C (rs662799) promoter polymorphism of the apolipoprotein A5 (APOA5) gene in relation to triglyceride concentration, several other risk factors, and risk of coronary heart disease. We compared disease risk for genetically-raised triglyceride concentration (20 842 patients with coronary heart disease, 35 206 controls) with that recorded for equivalent differences in circulating triglyceride concentration in prospective studies (302 430 participants with no history of cardiovascular disease; 12 785 incident cases of coronary heart disease during 2.79 million person-years at risk). We analysed -1131T>C in 1795 people without a history of cardiovascular disease who had information about lipoprotein concentration and diameter obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Findings The minor allele frequency of -1131T>C was 8% (95% CI 7-9). -1131T>C was not significantly associated with several non-lipid risk factors or LDL cholesterol, and it was modestly associated with lower HDL cholesterol (mean difference per C allele 3.5% [95% CI 2.6-4.6]; 0.053 mmol/L [0.039-0.068]), lower apolipoprotein AI (1.3% [0.3-2.3]; 0.023 g/L [0.005-0.041]), and higher apolipoprotein B (3.2% [1.3-5.1]; 0.027 g/L [0.011-0.043]). By contrast, for every C allele inherited, mean triglyceride concentration was 16.0% (95% CI 12.9-18.7), or 0.25 mmol/L (0.20-0.29), higher (p=4.4x10(-24)). The odds ratio for coronary heart disease was 1.18 (95% CI 1.11-1.26; p=2.6x10(-7)) per C allele, which was concordant with the hazard ratio of 1.10 (95% CI 1.08-1.12) per 16% higher triglyceride concentration recorded in prospective studies. -1131T>C was significantly associated with higher VLDL particle concentration (mean difference per C allele 12.2 nmol/L [95% CI 7.7-16.7]; p=9.3x10(-8)) and smaller HDL particle size (0.14 nm [0.08-0.20]; p=7.0x10(-5)), factors that could mediate the effects of triglyceride. Interpretation These data are consistent with a causal association between triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary heart disease. Show less
