Ewing and chondrosaroma are two forms of primary bone cancer. The few clinical studies that are published in recent decades show disappointing results. With a 5 year survival of 10% for inoperable... Show moreEwing and chondrosaroma are two forms of primary bone cancer. The few clinical studies that are published in recent decades show disappointing results. With a 5 year survival of 10% for inoperable Ewing sarcoma and 2% for inoperable chondrosarcoma patients the outcome is poor. If a patient has not responded to standard treatment, they are often treated with combinations based on expert opinion of the treating physician. These treatment combinations have not been investigated in studies because of the small patient numbers which makes starting a study very difficult and time-consuming. One combination is of the chemotherapeutic agents etoposide with carboplatin or cisplatin. Analysis of the survival data of patients treated with these combinations shows that they are comparable to other standard treatment options. New non-chemotherapy treatment options are currently being investigated. Examples are the IGF-1R and PARP route. The current knowledge of both routes shows that disregulation causes malignant transformation and / or disease progression. Inhibition of these routes is therefore a possible treatment. In clinical studies, the results are not positive for all patients. This is due to incorrect patient selection and not being tested in combination with already used treatments. Show less
BACKGROUND: High grade primary bone sarcomas are rare cancers that affect mostly children and young adults. Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the most common histological subtypes in this age... Show moreBACKGROUND: High grade primary bone sarcomas are rare cancers that affect mostly children and young adults. Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the most common histological subtypes in this age group, with current multimodality treatment strategies achieving 55-70% overall survival. As there remains an urgent need to develop new therapeutic interventions, we have reviewed published phase I/II trials that have been reported for osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in the last twenty years.RESULTS: We conducted a literature search for clinical trials between 1990 and 2010, either for trials enrolling bone sarcoma patients as part of a general sarcoma indication or trials specifically in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. We identified 42 clinical trials that fulfilled our search criteria for general sarcoma that enrolled these patient groups, and eight and twenty specific trials for Ewing and osteosarcoma patients, respectively. For the phase I trials which enrolled different tumour types our results were incomplete, because the sarcoma patients were not mentioned in the PubMed abstract. A total of 3,736 sarcoma patients were included in these trials over this period, 1,114 for osteosarcoma and 1,263 for Ewing sarcoma. As a proportion of the worldwide disease burden over this period, these numbers reflect a very small percentage of the potential patient recruitment, approximately 0.6% for Ewing sarcoma and 0.2% for osteosarcoma. However, these data show an increase in recent activity overall and suggest there is still much room for improvement in the current trial development structures.CONCLUSION: Lack of resources and commercial investment will inevitably limit opportunity to develop sufficiently rapid improvements in clinical outcomes. International collaboration exists in many well founded co-operative groups for phase III trials, but progress may be more effective if there were also more investment of molecular and translational research into disease focused phase I/II clinical trials. Examples of new models for early translational and early phase trial collaboration include the European based EuroBoNeT network, the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration network (SARC) and the new European collaborative translational trial network, EuroSarc. Show less
