Background Despite newer treatments with immunosuppressive agents, there still exists a considerable morbidity and mortality risk among patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)... Show moreBackground Despite newer treatments with immunosuppressive agents, there still exists a considerable morbidity and mortality risk among patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Since 1994 the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS) has aimed for an improved outcome for patients with AAV, conducting several prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim for the present study was to further evaluate the long-term survival of patients with AAV included in seven RCTs conducted by the EUVAS as well as to identify potential prognostic factors. Methods Long-term follow-up data were collected from questionnaires sent to the principal investigators of the original RCTs (1995-2012): MEPEX, NORAM, CYCAZAREM, CYCLOPS, IMPROVE, RITUXVAS and MYCYC, comprising 848 patients, all newly diagnosed with AAV. Relative survival estimates are presented for the study cohorts. Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics at trial entry were studied as potential prognostic factors in multivariable models. Results A total of 478 (56%) patients had granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and 370 (44%) had microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) with a mean age at diagnosis of 58 +/- 14 years. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 2.9-13.6). During the observation period there were 305 deaths and the main causes were infections (26%), cardiovascular disease (14%) and malignancies (13%). When compared with a matched cohort (regarding country, age group and sex) from the background population there were 14.2% more deaths among our cohort of AAV patients at 5 years, 19.9% at 10 years, 28.8% at 15 years and 36.3% at 20 years. The excess mortality occurred in all age groups. The estimated median survival time (from diagnosis) was 17.8 years (95% confidence interval 15.7-20). Among variables measured at baseline, advanced age, male sex, low estimated glomerular filtration rate and low platelet count were identified as predictors of death in a multivariate Cox model. Conclusions Patients with AAV still have an increased risk of mortality compared with the general population despite newer therapeutic regimens. Treatment complications and organ damage are the main causes of limited survival and infections remain the leading cause of mortality among patients with AAV. Show less
Objectives The systemic vasculitides are multiorgan diseases where early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve outcomes. Robust nomenclature reduces diagnostic delay. However, key... Show moreObjectives The systemic vasculitides are multiorgan diseases where early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve outcomes. Robust nomenclature reduces diagnostic delay. However, key aspects of current nomenclature are widely perceived to be out of date, these include disease definitions, classification and diagnostic criteria. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to identify deficiencies and provide contemporary points to consider for the development of future definitions and criteria in systemic vasculitis. Methods The expert panel identified areas of concern within existing definitions/criteria. Consequently, a systematic literature review was undertaken looking to address these deficiencies and produce 'points to consider' in accordance with standardised European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) operating procedures. In the absence of evidence, expert consensus was used. Results There was unanimous consensus for re-evaluating existing definitions and developing new criteria. A total of 17 points to consider were proposed, covering 6 main areas: biopsy, laboratory testing, diagnostic radiology, nosology, definitions and research agenda. Suggestions to improve and expand current definitions were described including the incorporation of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody and aetiological factors, where known. The importance of biopsy in diagnosis and exclusion of mimics was highlighted, while equally emphasising its problems. Thus, the role of alternative diagnostic tools such as MRI, ultrasound and surrogate markers were also discussed. Finally, structures to develop future criteria were considered. Conclusions Limitations in current classification criteria and definitions for vasculitis have been identified and suggestions provided for improvement. Additionally it is proposed that, in combination with the updated evidence, these should form the basis of future attempts to develop and validate revised criteria and definitions of vasculitis. Show less
