Background: Approximately 2% of patients in primary care practice and up to 25% of hospital patients are registered as being allergic to an antibiotic. However, up to 90% of these registrations are... Show moreBackground: Approximately 2% of patients in primary care practice and up to 25% of hospital patients are registered as being allergic to an antibiotic. However, up to 90% of these registrations are incorrect, leading to unnecessary prescription of 2(nd) choice antibiotics with the attendant loss of efficacy, increased toxicity and antibiotic resistance. To improve registration, a better understanding is needed of how incorrect labels are attributed. Objective: To investigate the quality of antibiotic allergy registration in primary care and identify determinants to improve registration of antibiotic allergies. Design: Registration of antibiotic allergies in primary care practices were analysed for 1) completeness and 2) correctness. To identify determinants for improvement, semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers from four healthcare domains were conducted. Participants: A total of 300 antibiotic allergy registrations were analysed for completeness and correctness. Thirty-four healthcare providers were interviewed. Main measures: A registration was defined as complete when it included a description of all symptoms, time to onset of symptoms and the duration of symptoms. It was defined as correct when the conclusion was concordant with the Salden criteria. Determinants of correct antibiotic allergy registrations were divided into facilitators or obstructers. Key results: Rates of completeness and correctness of registrations were 0% and 29.3%, respectively. The main perceived barriers for correct antibiotic allergy registration were insufficient knowledge, lack of priority, limitations of registration features in electronic medical records (EMR), fear of medical liability and patients interpreting side-effects as allergies. Conclusions: The quality of antibiotic allergy registrations can be improved. Potential interventions include raising awareness of the consequences of incomplete and the importance of correct registrations, by continued education, and above all simplifying registration in an EMR by adequate ICT support. Show less
Bilsen, M.P.; Lambregts, M.M.C.; Prehn, J. van; Kuijper, E.J. 2022
Purpose of review Antimicrobial resistance is a rising threat to global health and is associated with increased mortality. Intestinal colonisation with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) can... Show morePurpose of review Antimicrobial resistance is a rising threat to global health and is associated with increased mortality. Intestinal colonisation with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) can precede invasive infection and facilitates spread within communities and hospitals. Novel decolonisation strategies, such as faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), are being explored. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on how the field of FMT for MDRO decolonisation has developed during the past year and to assess the efficacy of FMT for intestinal MDRO decolonisation. Recent findings Since 2020, seven highly heterogenous, small, nonrandomised cohort studies and five case reports have been published. In line with previous literature, decolonisation rates ranged from 20 to 90% between studies and were slightly higher for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae than vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Despite moderate decolonisation rates in two studies, a reduction in MDRO bloodstream and urinary tract infections was observed. Summary and implications Although a number of smaller cohort studies show some effect of FMT for MDRO decolonisation, questions remain regarding the true efficacy of FMT (taking spontaneous decolonisation into account), the optimal route of administration, the role of antibiotics pre and post-FMT and the efficacy in different patient populations. The observed decrease in MDRO infections post-FMT warrants further research. Show less
Berghuis, D.; Lambregts, M.M.C.; Boer, M.G.J. de 2021
Up to 10% of hospitalized patients have an antibiotic allergy label in their medical file, most frequently concerning penicillins. However, the vast majority of reported allergies to antibiotics... Show moreUp to 10% of hospitalized patients have an antibiotic allergy label in their medical file, most frequently concerning penicillins. However, the vast majority of reported allergies to antibiotics does not represent a "true" allergy but are due to drug intolerance, idiosyncratic reactions or symptoms of the concurrent infectious disease. Since antibiotic allergy labels result in deviation from first-choice antimicrobial therapy, tackling the issue of incorrect antibiotic allergy labelling, already at young age, is a core element of antibiotic stewardship. In this article, we describe the structured approach to the patient with a presumed antibiotic allergy with emphasis on key elements of allergy-specific history taking and the limited risk of cross-allergic reactions between beta-lactam subclasses. Show less
