Background: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the... Show moreBackground: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6R alpha antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway. Methods: A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document. Results: The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring. Conclusions: The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers. Show less
Kay, J.; Harigai, M.; Rancourt, J.; Dickson, C.; Melby, T.; Issa, M.; ... ; Kremer, J.M. 2020
Objective To characterise changes in selected haematological parameters following once-daily oral baricitinib dosing.Methods Data were pooled from eight randomised clinical trials (four phase 3,... Show moreObjective To characterise changes in selected haematological parameters following once-daily oral baricitinib dosing.Methods Data were pooled from eight randomised clinical trials (four phase 3, three phase 2, one phase 1b) and one long-term extension. Changes in haematological parameters were evaluated up to 128 weeks (N=2387); overall safety of baricitinib was assessed up to 6 years (N=3492).Results Mean absolute neutrophil counts decreased (-1.36x10(9)/L) within 1 month, followed by stabilisation within the normal reference range through week 128. The incidence of serious infections was not elevated in patients with neutropenia during the 24-week placebo-controlled period. Mean lymphocyte counts increased (+0.30x10(9)/L) within 1 month, then decreased to baseline (weeks 12-24). Mean platelet counts increased at week 2 (+51x10(9)/L), then decreased towards baseline. Overall, mean haemoglobin concentrations decreased (-0.12 mmol/L), then returned to baseline; however, reduced baseline haemoglobin concentrations observed in the highest baseline high-sensitivity C reactive protein quartile increased over time. Permanent drug discontinuation occurred due to laboratory abnormalities related to neutrophil count in 8 (0.2%), lymphocyte counts in 6 (0.2%), platelet counts in 8 (0.2%), and haemoglobin levels in 16 (0.5%) of all baricitinib-treated patients (N=3492 with 7993 total person-years of exposure).Conclusions Moderate decreases in neutrophils were seen during baricitinib treatment; however, serious infection was uncommon in patients with neutropenia. Transient increases were observed in lymphocytes and platelets, which returned to baseline over time. Changes in haemoglobin concentration were generally small. Haematological abnormalities seldom led to drug discontinuation. Show less
OBJECTIVE: The contribution of low-penetrance single nucleotide polymorphisms to methotrexate efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is inconsistent between studies. We sought to elucidate... Show moreOBJECTIVE: The contribution of low-penetrance single nucleotide polymorphisms to methotrexate efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is inconsistent between studies. We sought to elucidate architecture of methotrexate response in three cohorts of patients with RA treated with methotrexate. METHODS: Single nucleotide polymorphism frequencies in genes from folate, purine, and pyrimidine pathways were measured to develop a model of gene-gene interactions using multifactor dimensionality reduction in 439 patients who received methotrexate in the USA and The Netherlands. A third cohort of 530 patients with RA from Sweden was used to replicate the findings. Methotrexate efficacy was assessed using the European League Against Rheumatism criteria in the majority of patients. RESULTS: Nonlinear patterns of gene-gene interactions between variants in aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase (C347G), reduced-folate carrier (G80A) and inosine-triphosphate pyrophosphatase (C94A) revealed a predisposing genetic attribute significantly associated with methotrexate response in the USA and Dutch cohorts [odds ratio (OR)=2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9-4.2; P<0.001]. Although the finding was not replicated in the Swedish cohort (OR=0.9; 95% CI: 0.64-1.37; P=0.74) a multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis superimposing the predisposing genetic attribute with patient's age, sex, and anticitrullinated peptide antibodies positivity (ACPA) revealed a pattern of interaction significant in all three cohorts (OR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-2.9; P<0.01). The selective advantage toward response in the presence of the predisposing genetic attribute was lost in females and ACPA-positive patients, whereas older and male ACPA-negative patients tended to exhibit a greater likelihood of response in the absence of the predisposing genetic attribute. CONCLUSION: Gene-gene interactions together with nongenetic attributes may contribute to methotrexate efficacy in RA. Show less
Objectives: To determine the efficacy of CP-690,550 in improving pain, function and health status in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to... Show moreObjectives: To determine the efficacy of CP-690,550 in improving pain, function and health status in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate or a tumour necrosis factor a inhibitor. Methods: Patients were randomised equally to placebo, CP-690,550 5, 15 or 30 mg twice daily for 6 weeks, with 6 weeks' follow-up. The patient's assessment of arthritis pain (pain), patient's assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were recorded. Results: At week 6, significantly more patients in the CP-690,550 5, 15 and 30 mg twice-daily groups experienced a 50% improvement in pain compared with placebo (44%, 66%, 78% and 14%, respectively), clinically meaningful reductions in HAQ-DI (>= 0.3 units) (57%, 75%, 76% and 36%, respectively) and clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 domains and physical and mental components. Conclusions: CP-690,550 was efficacious in improving the pain, function and health status of patients with RA, from week 1 to week 6. Show less
