Mechanical loosening of implants is in the majority accompanied with a periprosthetic interface membrane, which has to be removed during revision surgery. The same is true if a minimal invasive ... Show moreMechanical loosening of implants is in the majority accompanied with a periprosthetic interface membrane, which has to be removed during revision surgery. The same is true if a minimal invasive (percutaneous) refixation of a loose implant is done. We describe the requirements for a waterjet applicator for interface tissue removal for this percutaneous hip refixation technique. The technical requirements were either obtained from a literature review, a theoretical analysis, or by experimental setup. Based on the requirements, a waterjet applicator is designed which is basically a flexible tube (outer diameter 3 mm) with two channels. One channel for the water supply (diameter 0.9 mm) and one for suction to evacuate water and morcellated interface tissue from the periprosthetic cavity. The applicator has a rigid tip (length 6 mm), which directs the water flow to create two waterjets (diameter 0.2 mm), both focused into the suction channel. The functionality of this new applicator is demonstrated by testing a prototype of the applicator tip in an in vitro experimental setup. This testing has shown that the designed applicator for interface tissue removal will eliminate the risk of water pressure buildup; the ejected water was immediately evacuated from the periprosthetic cavity. Blocking of the suction opening was prevented because the jets cut through interface tissue that gets in front of the suction channel. Although further development of the water applicator is necessary, the presented design of the applicator is suitable for interface tissue removal in a minimally invasive hip refixation procedure. Show less
Aseptic loosening is the major failure mode for hip prostheses. Currently, loosened prostheses are revised during open surgery. Because of a high complication rate, this demanding procedure cannot... Show moreAseptic loosening is the major failure mode for hip prostheses. Currently, loosened prostheses are revised during open surgery. Because of a high complication rate, this demanding procedure cannot be performed in patients with a poor general health. We are developing an alternative minimally invasive refixation procedure that leaves the prostheses in place, but relies on removing the interface membrane and replacing it with bone cement. The aim of this study was to evaluate two interface tissue removal techniques - Ho:YAG laser and coblation - based on two criteria: thermal damage and the ablation rate. In vitro a loosened hip prosthesis was simulated by implanting a prosthesis in each of 10 cadaver femora. Artificially created peri-prosthetic lesions were filled with chicken liver as an interface tissue substitute. We measured temperatures in vitro at different radial distances from the site of removal. Temperatures during removal were recorded both inside the interface tissue and in the surrounding bone. This study demonstrated that temperatures generated in the bone do not result in thermal damage (increasing less than 10°C relative to body temperature). Temperatures inside the interface tissue are sufficiently high to destroy the interface tissue (T>50°C, duration>1min). Using laser instead of coblation for the removal of interface tissue resulted in higher temperatures - thus a faster removal of interface tissue. This is in accordance with the ablation rate test. Ho:YAG laser is advantageous compared to coblation. We consider Ho:YAG laser a promising tool for interface tissue removal. Show less
OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography is the modality of choice for measuring osteolysis but suffers from metal-induced artefacts obscuring periprosthetic tissues. Previous papers on metal artefact... Show moreOBJECTIVE: Computed tomography is the modality of choice for measuring osteolysis but suffers from metal-induced artefacts obscuring periprosthetic tissues. Previous papers on metal artefact reduction (MAR) show qualitative improvements, but their algorithms have not found acceptance for clinical applications. We investigated to what extent metal artefacts interfere with the segmentation of lesions adjacent to a metal femoral implant and whether metal artefact reduction improves the manual segmentation of such lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We manually created 27 periprosthetic lesions in 10 human cadaver femora. We filled the lesions with a fibrotic interface tissue substitute. Each femur was fitted with a polished tapered cobalt-chrome prosthesis and imaged twice-once with the metal, and once with a substitute resin prosthesis inserted. Metal-affected CTs were processed using standard back-projection as well as projection interpolation (PI) MAR. Two experienced users segmented all lesions and compared segmentation accuracy. RESULTS: We achieved accurate delineation of periprosthetic lesions in the metal-free images. The presence of a metal implant led us to underestimate lesion volume and introduced geometrical errors in segmentation boundaries. Although PI MAR reduced streak artefacts, it led to greater underestimation of lesion volume and greater geometrical errors than without its application. CONCLUSION: CT metal artefacts impair image segmentation. PI MAR can improve subjective image appearance but causes loss of detail and lower image contrast adjacent to prostheses. Our experiments showed that PI MAR is counterproductive for manual segmentation of periprosthetic lesions and should be used with care. Show less
