Newly introduced hybrid systems that combine an MRI scanner with a linear accelerator for radiation treatment, called MR-linacs, provide an opportunity for the daily acquisition of quantitative MRI... Show moreNewly introduced hybrid systems that combine an MRI scanner with a linear accelerator for radiation treatment, called MR-linacs, provide an opportunity for the daily acquisition of quantitative MRI (qMRI) without increasing patient burden. This allows for the measurement of changes in quantitative MRI biomarkers over time, that may indicate a response to the radiation treatment. In this thesis, the performance of the Unity MR-linac with regards to several qMRI sequences was characterized, showing results similar to diagnostic systems in terms of accuracy and repeatability. Additionally, we found changes in qMRI parameters in patients early during treatment, which indicates potential as biomarkers for treatment outcome. Show less
Kooreman, E.S.; Pelt, V. van; Nowee, M.E.; Pos, F.; Heide, U.A. van der; Houdt, P.J. van 2022
Purpose: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a promising technique that can acquire perfusion information without the use of contrast agent, contrary to the more established dynamic contrast... Show morePurpose: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a promising technique that can acquire perfusion information without the use of contrast agent, contrary to the more established dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) technique. This is of interest for treatment response monitoring, where patients can be imaged on each treatment fraction. In this study, longitudinal correlations between IVIM- and DCE parameters were assessed in prostate cancer patients receiving radiation treatment.Materials and Methods: 20 prostate cancer patients were treated on a 1.5 T MR-linac with 20 x 3 or 3.1 Gy. Weekly IVIM and DCE scans were acquired. Tumors, the peripheral zone (PZ), and the transition zone (TZ) were delineated on a T2-weighted scan acquired on the first fraction. IVIM and DCE scans were registered to this scan and the delineations were propagated. Median values from these delineations were used for further analysis. The IVIM parameters D, f, D* and the product fD* were calculated. The Tofts model was used to calculate the DCE parameters Ktrans, kep and ve. Pearson correlations were calculated for the IVIM and DCE parameters on values from the first fraction for each region of interest (ROI). For longitudinal analysis, the repeated measures correlation coefficient was used to determine correlations between IVIM and DCE parameters in each ROI.Results: When averaging over patients, an increase during treatment in all IVIM and DCE parameters was observed in all ROIs, except for D in the PZ and TZ. No significant Pearson correlations were found between any pair of IVIM and DCE parameters measured on the first fraction. Significant but low longitudinal correlations were found for some combinations of IVIM and DCE parameters in the PZ and TZ, while no significant longitudinal correlations were found in the tumor. Notably in the TZ, for both f and fD*, significant longitudinal correlations with all DCE parameters were found.Conclusions: The increase in IVIM- and DCE parameters when averaging over patients indicates a measurable response to radiation treatment with both techniques. Although low, significant longitudinal correlations were found which suggests that IVIM could potentially be used as an alternative to DCE for treatment response monitoring. Show less
Kooreman, E.S.; Tanaka, M.; Beek, L.C. ter; Peters, F.P.; Marijnen, C.A.M.; Heide, U.A. van der; Houdt, P.J. van 2022
Quantitative MRI has the potential to produce imaging biomarkers for the prediction of early response to radiotherapy treatment. In this pilot study, a potential imaging biomarker, the T-1 rho... Show moreQuantitative MRI has the potential to produce imaging biomarkers for the prediction of early response to radiotherapy treatment. In this pilot study, a potential imaging biomarker, the T-1 rho relaxation time, is assessed for this purpose. A T-1 rho sequence was implemented on a 1.5 T MR-linac system, a system that combines an MRI with a linear accelerator for radiation treatment. An agar phantom with concentrations of 1-4% w/w was constructed for technical validation of the sequence. Phantom images were assessed in terms of short-term repeatability and signal-to-noise ratio. Twelve rectal cancer patients, who were treated with 5 x 5 Gy, were imaged on each treatment fraction. Individual changes in the T-1 rho values of the gross tumor volume (GTV) showed an increase for most patients, although a paired t-test comparing values in the GTV from the first to the last treatment fraction showed no statistically significant difference. The phantom measurements showed excellent short-term repeatability (0.5-1.5 ms), and phantom T-1 rho values corresponded to the literature values. T-1 rho imaging was implemented successfully on the MR-linac, with a repeatability comparable to diagnostic systems, although clinical benefit in terms of treatment response monitoring remains to be demonstrated. Show less
Background and purpose: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for treatment response monitoring is feasibleon hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. The MRI scanner of the... Show moreBackground and purpose: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for treatment response monitoring is feasibleon hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. The MRI scanner of the ElektaUnity system has an adjusted design compared to diagnostic scanners. We investigated its impact onmeasuring the DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) regarding three aspects: the choice ofb-values, the spatial variation of the ADC, and scanning during radiation treatment. The aim of this studyis to give recommendations for accurate ADC measurements on Unity systems.Materials and methods: Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements with increasing b-values were done todetermine the highest bvalue that can be measured reliably. The spatial variation of the ADC wasassessed on six Unity systems with a cylindrical phantom of 40 cm diameter. The influence of gantry rotationand irradiation was investigated by acquiring DWI images before and during treatment of 11 prostatecancer patients.Results: On the Unity system, a maximum b-value of 500 s/mm2 should be used for ADC quantification, asa trade-off between SNR and diffusion weighting. Accurate ADC values were obtained within 7 cm fromthe iso-center, while outside this region ADC values deviated more than 5%. The ADC was not influencedby the rotating linac or irradiation during treatment.Conclusion: We provide Unity system specific recommendations for measuring the ADC. This willincrease the consistency of ADC values acquired in different centers on the Unity system, enabling largecohort studies for biomarker discovery and treatment response monitoring. Show less
PurposeSystems for magnetic resonance (MR-) guided radiotherapy enable daily MR imaging of cancer patients during treatment, which is of interest for treatment response monitoring and biomarker... Show morePurposeSystems for magnetic resonance (MR-) guided radiotherapy enable daily MR imaging of cancer patients during treatment, which is of interest for treatment response monitoring and biomarker discovery using quantitative MRI (qMRI). Here, the performance of a 1.5 T MR-linac regarding qMRI was assessed on phantoms. Additionally, we show the feasibility of qMRI in a prostate cancer patient on this system for the first time.Materials and methodsFour 1.5 T MR-linac systems from four institutes were included in this study. T1 and T2 relaxation times, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, as well as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) images were acquired. Bland–Altman statistics were used, and accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility were determined.ResultsMedian accuracy for T1 ranged over the four systems from 2.7 to 14.3%, for T2 from 10.4 to 14.1%, and for ADC from 1.9 to 2.7%. For DCE images, the accuracy ranged from 12.8 to 35.8% for a gadolinium concentration of 0.5 mM and deteriorated for higher concentrations. Median short-term repeatability for T1 ranged from 0.6 to 5.1%, for T2 from 0.4 to 1.2%, and for ADC from 1.3 to 2.2%. DCE acquisitions showed a coefficient of variation of 0.1–0.6% in the signal intensity. Long-term repeatability was 1.8% for T1, 1.4% for T2, 1.7% for ADC, and 17.9% for DCE. Reproducibility was 11.2% for T1, 2.9% for T2, 2.2% for ADC, and 18.4% for DCE.ConclusionThese results indicate that qMRI on the Unity MR-linac is feasible, accurate, and repeatable which is promising for treatment response monitoring and treatment plan adaptation based on daily qMRI. Show less
