Dit proefschrift richt zich op het monitoren van ziekte bij zowel RA als UA pati_nten en kijkt daarbij naar de waarde van de beeldvorming, het beoordelen van de ziekteactiviteit, het vast te... Show moreDit proefschrift richt zich op het monitoren van ziekte bij zowel RA als UA pati_nten en kijkt daarbij naar de waarde van de beeldvorming, het beoordelen van de ziekteactiviteit, het vast te stellen behandeldoel en de implementatie van monitoring in de dagelijkse praktijk. Naar aanleiding van dit proefschrift kunnen de volgende conclusies worden getrokken: -Systematisch literatuur onderzoek laat zien dat afwijkingen op conventionele r_ntgenfoto__s waardevol zijn voor het voorspellen van de prognose van UA pati_nten. Voor de aanvullende waarde van echografie en MRI in UA pati_nten werd weinig bewijs gevonden. -Gewrichtsschade ter plaatste van de pols, met name erosieve schade, heeft een belangrijke invloed op het dagelijks functioneren van pati_nten met reumato_de artritis. -Een versimpelde DAS zonder gegradeerde of gegroepeerde pijnscore kan goed worden gebruikt voor het in kaart brengen van ziekteactiviteit, zowel met een VAS voor algemene gezondheid als met een VAS voor ziekteactiviteit. -De mate van ziekteactiviteit gescoord door pati_nten en artsen komt niet goed overeen. Pati_nten scoren over het algemeen hoger waarbij pijn een belangrijke factor van invloed is. Artsen baseren hun score meer op de bezinking en het aantal gezwollen gewrichten. -De relatie tussen verschillende definities van remissie (inclusief de nieuwe ACR/EULAR remissie criteria) en radiologische schade of HAQ is vergelijkbaar. -Verbetering in ziekteactiviteit geeft een verbetering in kwaliteit van leven gemeten met de Physical Component Scale van de SF-36. Dit geldt ook voor pati_nten met reeds een lage ziekteactiviteit die in remissie komen. -Pati_nten zijn bereid tot het online monitoren van lichamelijk functioneren, maar doen dit in de thuissituatie weinig. Meer begeleiding en het benadrukken van het nut van regelmatige ziektemonitoring voor het uiteindelijke behandelresultaat is nodig om dit te kunnen verbeteren. Show less
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of joint space narrowing (JSN) and erosions in general and in four different joint groups in relation to physical disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).... Show moreOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of joint space narrowing (JSN) and erosions in general and in four different joint groups in relation to physical disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: 5-year follow-up data from the Behandel Strategieën (BeSt) trial were used, where 508 patients with recent onset RA were treated aiming at a disease activity score ≤2.4. Joint damage was assessed annually and scored according to the Sharp-van der Heijde method. Physical disability was measured 3-monthly with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Generalised Estimating Equations analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the HAQ and JSN scores and erosions scores, separately and in joint groups. RESULTS: Overall, damage scores were low, and neither total JSN nor erosions showed a significant effect on HAQ (β=0.001 95% CI -0.003 to 0.004 and β=0.002 95% CI -0.001 to 0.006, respectively). Of the total damage scores per joint group, damage in the wrist shows a trend for association with physical disability displaying the largest effect size (β=0.005 95% CI 0.000 to 0.011). Also in the analysis with erosions per joint group, the wrist was most strongly related with physical functioning (β=0.016 95% CI 0.003 to 0.029); in the analysis with JSN per joint group no joint group was significantly related to the HAQ. Analysis of all erosion and narrowing scores per joint group in one model reveals only erosions in the wrist to be independently associated with impaired physical functioning (β=0.017 95% CI 0.003 to 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Joint damage in the wrist, erosions more than JSN, is associated with impaired physical functioning even in patients with early RA with limited overall damage after 5 years tightly controlled treatment. Show less
Klarenbeek, N.B.; Koevoets, R.; Heijde, D.M.F.M. van der; Gerards, A.H.; Wolde, S. ten; Kerstens, P.J.S.M.; ... ; Allaart, C.F. 2011
Objective To compare nine disease activity indices and the new American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) remission criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and... Show moreObjective To compare nine disease activity indices and the new American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) remission criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to relate these to physical function and joint damage progression. Methods Five-year data from the BeSt study were used, a randomised clinical trial comparing four treatment strategies in 508 patients with recent-onset RA. Every three months disease activity was assessed with nine indices (Disease Activity Score (DAS), DAS-C reactive proteine (DAS-CRP), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS-28), DAS28-CRP, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and three DAS versions with adjusted tender joint scores) and categorized into remission, low, moderate and high disease activity (LDA, MDA, HDA). In addition, the recent ACR/EULAR clinical trial and practice remission was assessed 3-monthly with 28 and 68/66 joint counts. For each index, Generalized Estimating Equations analyses were performed to relate disease activity levels and the absence/presence of remission to 3-monthly assessments of physical functioning and annual radiological progression. Results From the composite indices, CDAI and SDAI were the most stringent definitions of remission and classified more patients as LDA. DAS28 and DAS28-CRP had the highest proportions of remission and MDA and a smaller proportion of LDA. ACR/EULAR remission percentages were comparable to CDAI/SDAI: remission percentages. The variant including CRP and 68/66 joint counts was the most stringent. For all indices, higher levels of disease activity were associated with decreased physical functioning and more radiological damage progression. Despite differences in classification between the indices, no major differences in relation to the two outcomes were observed. Conclusion The associations of nine composite indices and ACR/EULAR remission criteria with functional status and joint damage progression showed high accordance, whereas the proportions of patients classified in the disease activity levels differed. Show less
Koevoets, R.; Klarenbeek, N.B.; Guler-Yuksel, M.; Oosterhout, M. van; Krugten, M.V. van; Kerstens, P.J.S.M.; ... ; Allaart, C.F. 2011
Objective To evaluate three disease activity score (DAS) alternatives without the Ritchie articular index (RAI). To compare the use of patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity versus... Show moreObjective To evaluate three disease activity score (DAS) alternatives without the Ritchie articular index (RAI). To compare the use of patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity versus global assessment of health (GH) in DAS, DAS alternatives and DAS28. Methods Data from the BeSt study were used, a treatment strategy trial in early rheumatoid arthritis patients aiming at a DAS <= 2.4. DAS alternatives were DAS 0-1, with the RAI (0-3) reduced to a no-yes (0-1) score, DAS tender joint count 53 (DAS TJC53), with a 0-1 TJC in 53 separate joints and DAS TJC44 in 44 joints. Correlation patterns, mean difference from original DAS, classification differences in disease activity level and patient percentages with radiological damage progression per level were determined for all scores. Results In the majority of patients the scores were equal and correlation was high. Mean difference with the DAS at year 1 was -0.03 for DAS 0-1, 0.18 for DAS TJC53 and 0.11 for DAS TJC44. Classification agreement between scores was high (kappa year 1 0.76-0.98). Patient percentages with joint damage progression were similar for all scores. DAS, DAS alternative and DAS28 perform similarly using either PGA or GH. Conclusion DAS without the RAI perform comparably to the original DAS and may be chosen as alternatives. PGA can replace GH in the DAS, the alternatives and DAS28. Show less
Machado, P.M.M.C.; Koevoets, R.; Bombardier, C.; Heijde, D.M. van der 2011
Objective. To perform a systematic literature review of the diagnostic and prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in patients with undifferentiated peripheral... Show moreObjective. To perform a systematic literature review of the diagnostic and prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) in patients with undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis (UPIA), and to assess if MRI and US should be done at baseline and repeated, and if so, at what interval. Methods. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and abstracts presented at the 2007 and 2008 meetings of the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism meetings were searched for diagnostic and prognostic studies of any duration examining the ability of MRI/US to predict outcome of patients with UPIA. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR-) were calculated. When available, odds ratios were extracted. Quality was appraised using validated scales. Results. Regarding MRI, 11 out of 2595 screened references were included: 2 described pure undifferentiated arthritis (UA) populations and 9, mixed populations. Bone edema (LR+4.5) and combination of a distinct MRI synovitis and erosion pattern (LR+4.8) increased probability of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Absence of MRI synovitis (LR-0.2) and absence of a distinct synovitis pattern (LR-0) decreased probability of developing RA. Regarding US, 2 out of 2111 references were included, both mixed populations; no data could be extrapolated for UPIA. Conclusion. MRI bone edema and combined synovitis and erosion pattern seem useful in predicting development of RA from UPIA. The value of US in UPIA remains to be determined. The absence of MRI synovitis seems useful in excluding development of RA. No data were found about the value of repeating MRI/US. Studies evaluating MRI/US in UPIA are scarce, but current knowledge strongly encourages further testing in UA. (J Rheumatol 2010;38 Suppl 87:31-37; doi:10.3899/jrheum.101072) Show less
Koevoets, R.; Machado, P.; Bombardier, C.; Heijde, D.M. van der 2011
Objective. To perform a systematic literature review on the diagnostic and predictive value of conventional radiographs (CR) in patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Methods. We performed... Show moreObjective. To perform a systematic literature review on the diagnostic and predictive value of conventional radiographs (CR) in patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA). Methods. We performed an extended search using Medline. Embase, the Cochrane Library, and abstracts from the 2007 and 2008 meetings of the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism. Articles were included based on predefined inclusion criteria, and quality was assessed by using validated quality scales. Results. In total, 25 articles were included from 6003 retrieved references. Five articles described a pure UA population, 20 articles described a mixed population [mostly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and UA]. In studies on UA, erosions on CR were strong predictors of RA diagnosis [positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 3.5-10.9; odds ratio 7.6 and 8.7). In a more heterogeneous mixed population, 20 studies reporting on 11 cohorts found a relationship between CR findings and subsequent diagnosis of RA. LR+ for erosions and/or bony decalcifications ranged from 1.8 to 9.7, and there was greater prevalence of erosions and higher Sharp-van der Heijde score in the RA group at followup. With regard to prognosis in both UA and mixed populations, an association was found between number of abnormalities on CR and poor outcome. Conclusion. Several studies, in pure UA and mixed populations, clearly demonstrate that CR are helpful in predicting future diagnosis of RA or worse prognosis. However, absence of abnormalities on CR does not sufficiently exclude RA or other unfavorable outcome. (J Rheumatol 2010;38 Suppl 87:26-30; doi:10.3899/jrheum.101071) Show less
Machado, P.; Castrejon, I.; Katchamart, W.; Koevoets, R.; Kuriya, B.; Schoels, M.; ... ; Bombardier, C. 2011
Objective To develop evidence-based recommendations on how to investigate and follow-up undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis (UPIA). Methods 697 rheumatologists from 17 countries... Show moreObjective To develop evidence-based recommendations on how to investigate and follow-up undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis (UPIA). Methods 697 rheumatologists from 17 countries participated in the 3E (Evidence, Expertise, Exchange) Initiative of 2008-9 consisting of three separate rounds of discussions and modified Delphi votes. In the first round 10 clinical questions were selected. A bibliographic team systematically searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ACR/EULAR 2007-2008 meeting abstracts. Relevant articles were reviewed for quality assessment, data extraction and synthesis. In the second round each country elaborated a set of national recommendations. Finally, multinational recommendations were formulated and agreement among the participants and the potential impact on their clinical practice was assessed. Results A total of 39 756 references were identified, of which 250 were systematically reviewed. Ten multinational key recommendations about the investigation and follow-up of UPIA were formulated. One recommendation addressed differential diagnosis and investigations prior to establishing the operational diagnosis of UPIA, seven recommendations related to the diagnostic and prognostic value of clinical and laboratory assessments in established UPIA (history and physical examination, acute phase reactants, autoantibodies, radiographs, MRI and ultrasound, genetic markers and synovial biopsy), one recommendation highlighted predictors of persistence (chronicity) and the final recommendation addressed monitoring of clinical disease activity in UPIA. Conclusions Ten recommendations on how to investigate and follow-up UPIA in the clinical setting were developed. They are evidence-based and supported by a large panel of rheumatologists, thus enhancing their validity and practical use. Show less
