There is a paucity of data on anticoagulation strategies and clinical outcomes after bleeding events for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In a multicenter Japanese registry enrolling 3027 patients... Show moreThere is a paucity of data on anticoagulation strategies and clinical outcomes after bleeding events for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In a multicenter Japanese registry enrolling 3027 patients with acute symptomatic VTE, after excluding 430 patients with thrombolysis and 207 patients without anticoagulation therapy, the current study population consisted of 2390 patients, who were divided into patients with major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding and no bleeding during anticoagulation therapy. All-cause death at 90 days after the bleeding events was evaluated as the primary outcome. There were 189 patients with major bleeding, 147 patients with CRNM bleeding, and 2054 patients without bleeding. Among 189 patients with major bleeding, 142 patients (75%) discontinued anticoagulants, of whom patients with temporary discontinuation and those with permanent discontinuation accounted for 63 patients (44%) and 79 patients (56%), and 58 patients (30.7%) died within 90 days after the bleeding events. The multivariable logistic regression model among patients with bleeding events revealed that active cancer and bleeding events within 90 days after VTE diagnosis were independently associated with 90-day mortality after the bleeding events (active cancer: OR 5.05, 95%CI 2.82-9.05; bleeding events within 90 days after VTE diagnosis: OR 2.23, 95%CI 1.25-3.96). In this practice-based large registry, anticoagulants were frequently discontinued in patients who experienced major bleeding events during anticoagulation therapy and nearly half of them restarted anticoagulants with mortality rate of approximately 30% within 90 days after the bleeding events, and active cancer was the most prevalent cause of death. Show less
MET exon 14 ( MET ex14) skipping mutations occur in 3% to 4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Currently, four oral MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are in use for the treatment of... Show moreMET exon 14 ( MET ex14) skipping mutations occur in 3% to 4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Currently, four oral MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are in use for the treatment of patients with MET ex14 skipping NSCLC (tepotinib, capmatinib, savolitinib, and crizotinib). To support optimal management of MET ex14 skipping NSCLC in this typically older patient population, the safety profiles of these treatment options are reviewed here. Published safety data from prospective clinical trials with MET TKIs in patients with MET ex14 skipping NSCLC were reviewed. Treatmentrelated adverse events (TRAEs) occurring in > 10% of patients were reported where feasible. Guidance on clinical monitoring and management of key MET TKI TRAEs and dr ug-dr ug interactions is provided. Across the clinical trials, safety data for MET TKIs were reported for 442 patients with MET ex14 skipping. Peripheral edema was the most reported TRAE (50%-63% of patients; grade > 3: 1%-11%), followed by nausea (26%-46% of patients; grade > 3: 0%1%). TRAEs led to dose reductions in 33% to 38% of patients and to discontinuation in 7% to 14% of patients, across the MET TKIs. Considerations on interpreting available safety data are provided, along with insights into monitoring and managing specific MET TKI TRAEs of interest and dr ug-dr ug interactions. Overall, MET TKIs are tolerable treatment options for patients with MET ex14 skipping NSCLC, an older population for whom chemo- or immuno-therapy may not be an effective nor tolerable option. More data regarding the effectiveness of safety interventions and management strategies are needed. Show less
BACKGROUNDA splice-site mutation that results in a loss of transcription of exon 14 in the oncogenic driverMEToccurs in 3 to 4% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the... Show moreBACKGROUNDA splice-site mutation that results in a loss of transcription of exon 14 in the oncogenic driverMEToccurs in 3 to 4% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, in this patient population.METHODSIn this open-label, phase 2 study, we administered tepotinib (at a dose of 500 mg) once daily in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with a confirmedMETexon 14 skipping mutation. The primary end point was the objective response by independent review among patients who had undergone at least 9 months of follow-up. The response was also analyzed according to whether the presence of aMETexon 14 skipping mutation was detected on liquid biopsy or tissue biopsy.RESULTSAs of January 1, 2020, a total of 152 patients had received tepotinib, and 99 patients had been followed for at least 9 months. The response rate by independent review was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 57), with a median duration of response of 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.2 to could not be estimated) in the combined-biopsy group. The response rate was 48% (95% CI, 36 to 61) among 66 patients in the liquid-biopsy group and 50% (95% CI, 37 to 63) among 60 patients in the tissue-biopsy group; 27 patients had positive results according to both methods. The investigator-assessed response rate was 56% (95% CI, 45 to 66) and was similar regardless of the previous therapy received for advanced or metastatic disease. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher that were considered by investigators to be related to tepotinib therapy were reported in 28% of the patients, including peripheral edema in 7%. Adverse events led to permanent discontinuation of tepotinib in 11% of the patients. A molecular response, as measured in circulating free DNA, was observed in 67% of the patients with matched liquid-biopsy samples at baseline and during treatment.CONCLUSIONSAmong patients with advanced NSCLC with a confirmedMETexon 14 skipping mutation, the use of tepotinib was associated with a partial response in approximately half the patients.Peripheral edema was the main toxic effect of grade 3 or higher. Show less
Aims There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention... Show moreAims There is debate about the optimum algorithm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk estimation. We conducted head-to-head comparisons of four algorithms recommended by primary prevention guidelines, before and after 'recalibration', a method that adapts risk algorithms to take account of differences in the risk characteristics of the populations being studied.Methods and results Using individual-participant data on 360 737 participants without CVD at baseline in 86 prospective studies from 22 countries, we compared the Framingham risk score (FRS), Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), pooled cohort equations (PCE), and Reynolds risk score (RRS). We calculated measures of risk discrimination and calibration, and modelled clinical implications of initiating statin therapy in people judged to be at 'high' 10 year CVD risk. Original risk algorithms were recalibrated using the risk factor profile and CVD incidence of target populations. The four algorithms had similar risk discrimination. Before recalibration, FRS, SCORE, and PCE over predicted CVD risk on average by 10%, 52%, and 41%, respectively, whereas RRS under-predicted by 10%. Original versions of algorithms classified 29 39% of individuals aged >= 40 years as high risk. By contrast, recalibration reduced this proportion to 22-24% for every algorithm. We estimated that to prevent one CVD event, it would be necessary to initiate statin therapy in 44 51 such individuals using original algorithms, in contrast to 37-39 individuals with recalibrated algorithms.Conclusion Before recalibration, the clinical performance of four widely used CVD risk algorithms varied substantially. By contrast, simple recalibration nearly equalized their performance and improved modelled targeting of preventive action to clinical need. Show less
