The purpose of this study was to characterize the motion and define the required treatment margins of the pathological mesorectal lymph nodes (GTVln) for two online adaptive MRI-guided strategies... Show moreThe purpose of this study was to characterize the motion and define the required treatment margins of the pathological mesorectal lymph nodes (GTVln) for two online adaptive MRI-guided strategies for sequential boosting. Secondly, we determine the margins required for the primary gross tumor volume (GTVprim). Twenty-eight patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac were included in the study. On T2-weighted images for adaptation (MRIadapt) before and verification after irradiation (MRIpost) of five treatment fractions per patient, the GTVln and GTVprim were delineated. With online adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy, daily plan adaptation can be performed through the use of two different strategies. In an adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow the interfraction motion is effectively corrected by redelineation and the only relevant motion is intrafraction motion, while in an adapt-to-position (ATP) workflow the margin (for GTVln) is dominated by interfraction motion. The margin required for GTVprim will be identical to the ATS workflow, assuming each fraction would be perfectly matched on GTVprim. The intrafraction motion was calculated between MRIadapt and MRIpost for the GTVln and GTVprim separately. The interfraction motion of the GTVln was calculated with respect to the position of GTVprim, assuming each fraction would be perfectly matched on GTVprim. PTV margins were calculated for each strategy using the Van Herk recipe. For GTVln we randomly sampled the original dataset 20 times, with each subset containing a single randomly selected lymph node for each patient. The resulting margins for ATS ranged between 3 and 4 mm (LR), 3 and 5 mm (CC) and 5 and 6 mm (AP) based on the 20 randomly sampled datasets for GTVln. For ATP, the margins for GTVln were 10–12 mm in LR and AP and 16–19 mm in CC. The margins for ATS for GTVprim were 1.7 mm (LR), 4.7 mm (CC) and 3.2 mm anterior and 5.6 mm posterior. Daily delineation using ATS of both target volumes results in the smallest margins and is therefore recommended for safe dose escalation to the primary tumor and lymph nodes. Show less
Janssen, T.M.; Heide, U.A. van der; Remeijer, P.; Sonke, J.J.; Bijl, E. van der 2022
Background and purpose: Strategies to limit the impact of intra-fraction motion during treatment are common in radiotherapy. Margin recipes, however, are not designed to incorporate these... Show moreBackground and purpose: Strategies to limit the impact of intra-fraction motion during treatment are common in radiotherapy. Margin recipes, however, are not designed to incorporate these strategies. This work aimed to provide a framework to determine how motion management strategies influence treatment margins. Materials and methods: Two models of intra-fraction motion were considered. In model 1 motion was instantaneous, before treatment starts and in model 2 motion was a continuous drift during treatment. Motion management strategies were modelled by truncating the underlying error distribution at cσ, with σ the standard deviation of the distribution and c a free parameter. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we determined how motion management changed the required margin. The analysis was performed for different number of treatment fractions and different standard deviations of the underlying random and systematic errors. Results: The required margin for a continuous drift was found to be well approximated by an average position of the target at ¾ of the drift. Introducing a truncation at cσ, the relative change in the margin was equal to 0.3c. This result held for both models, was independent of σ or the number of fractions and naturally generalizes to the situation with a residual (systematic) error. Conclusion: Treatment margins can be determined when motion management strategies are applied. Moreover, our analysis can be used to study the potential benefit of different motion management strategies. This allows to discuss and determine the most appropriate strategy for margin reduction. Show less
Kensen, C.M.; Janssen, T.M.; Betgen, A.; Wiersema, L.; Peters, F.P.; Remeijer, P.; ... ; Heide, U.A. van der 2022
Purpose: To determine PTV margins for intrafraction motion in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for rectal cancer and the potential benefit of performing a 2nd adaptation prior to irradiation... Show morePurpose: To determine PTV margins for intrafraction motion in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for rectal cancer and the potential benefit of performing a 2nd adaptation prior to irradiation. Methods: Thirty patients with rectal cancer received radiotherapy on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. On T2-weighted images for adaptation (MRIadapt), verification prior to (MRIver) and after irradiation (MRIpost) of 5 treatment fractions per patient, the primary tumor GTV (GTV(prim)) and mesorectum CTV (CTVmeso) were delineated. The structures on MRIadapt were expanded to corresponding PTVs. We determined the required expansion margins such that on average over 5 fractions, 98% of CTVmeso and 95% of GTV(prim) on MRIpost was covered in 90% of the patients. Furthermore, we studied the benefit of an additional adaptation, just prior to irradiation, by evaluating the coverage between the structures on MRIver and MRIpost. A threshold to assess the need for a secondary adaptation was determined by considering the overlap between MRIadapt and MRIver. Results: PTV margins for intrafraction motion without 2nd adaptation were 6.4 mm in the anterior direction and 4.0 mm in all other directions for CTVmeso and 5.0 mm isotropically for GTV(prim). A 2nd adaptation, applied for all fractions where the motion between MRIadapt and MRIver exceeded 1 mm (36% of the fractions) would result in a reduction of the PTVmeso margin to 3.2 mm/2.0 mm. For PTVprim a margin reduction to 3.5 mm is feasible when a 2nd adaptation is performed in fractions where the motion exceeded 4 mm (17% of the fractions). Conclusion: We studied the potential benefit of intrafraction motion monitoring and a 2nd adaptation to reduce PTV margins in online adaptive MRIgRT in rectal cancer. Performing 2nd adaptations immediately after online replanning when motion exceeded 1 mm and 4 mm for CTVmeso and GTV(prim) respectively, could result in a 30-50% margin reduction with limited reduction of dose to the bowel. Show less
Schoot, A.J.A.J. van de; Visser, J.; Kesteren, Z. van; Janssen, T.M.; Rasch, C.R.N.; Bel, A. 2016
The Pareto front reflects the optimal trade-offs between conflicting objectives and can be used to quantify the effect of different beam configurations on plan robustness and dose-volume histogram... Show moreThe Pareto front reflects the optimal trade-offs between conflicting objectives and can be used to quantify the effect of different beam configurations on plan robustness and dose-volume histogram parameters. Therefore, our aim was to develop and implement a method to automatically approach the Pareto front in robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) planning. Additionally, clinically relevant Pareto fronts based on different beam configurations will be derived and compared to enable beam configuration selection in cervical cancer proton therapy.A method to iteratively approach the Pareto front by automatically generating robustly optimized IMPT plans was developed. To verify plan quality, IMPT plans were evaluated on robustness by simulating range and position errors and recalculating the dose. For five retrospectively selected cervical cancer patients, this method was applied for IMPT plans with three different beam configurations using two, three and four beams. 3D Pareto fronts were optimized on target coverage (CTV D99%) and OAR doses (rectum V30Gy; bladder V40Gy). Per patient, proportions of non-approved IMPT plans were determined and differences between patient-specific Pareto fronts were quantified in terms of CTV D99%, rectum V30Gy and bladder V40Gy to perform beam configuration selection.Per patient and beam configuration, Pareto fronts were successfully sampled based on 200 IMPT plans of which on average 29% were non-approved plans. In all patients, IMPT plans based on the 2-beam set-up were completely dominated by plans with the 3-beam and 4-beam configuration. Compared to the 3-beam set-up, the 4-beam set-up increased the median CTV D-99% on average by 0.2 Gy and decreased the median rectum V-30Gy and median bladder V-40Gy on average by 3.6% and 1.3%, respectively.This study demonstrates a method to automatically derive Pareto fronts in robust IMPT planning. For all patients, the defined four-beam configuration was found optimal in terms of plan robustness, target coverage and OAR sparing. Show less
Leij, F. van der; Elkhuizen, P.H.M.; Janssen, T.M.; Poortmans, P.; Sangen, M. van der; Scholten, A.N.; ... ; Boersma, L.J. 2014
