Background and AimsOur goals were to study frailty screening in association with hospitalization and decline in quality of life [QoL] and functional status in older patients with inflammatory bowel... Show moreBackground and AimsOur goals were to study frailty screening in association with hospitalization and decline in quality of life [QoL] and functional status in older patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD].MethodsThis was a prospective multicentre cohort study in IBD patients ≥65 years old using frailty screening [G8 Questionnaire]. Outcomes were all-cause, acute, and IBD-related hospitalization, any infection, any malignancy, QoL [EQ5D-3L], and functional decline (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living [IADL]) during 18 months of follow-up. Confounders were age, IBD type, biochemical disease activity [C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/L and/or faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g], and comorbidity [Charlson Comorbidity Index].ResultsOf 405 patients, with a median age of 70 years, 196 [48%] were screened as being at risk for frailty. All-cause hospitalizations occurred 136 times in 96 patients [23.7%], and acute hospitalizations 103 times in 74 patients [18.3%]. Risk of frailty was not associated with all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9–2.4), but was associated with acute hospitalizations [aHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–3.8]. Infections occurred in 86 patients [21.2%] and these were not associated with frailty. A decline in QoL was experienced by 108 [30.6%] patients, and a decline in functional status by 46 patients [13.3%]. Frailty screening was associated with a decline in QoL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.6) and functional status [aOR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7–8.1].ConclusionsFrailty screening is associated with worse health outcomes in older patients with IBD. Further studies are needed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of its implementation in routine care. Show less
Asscher, V.E.R.; Waars, S.N.; Meulen-de Jong, A.E. van der; Stuyt, R.J.L.; Baven-Pronk, A.M.C.; Marel, S. van der; ... ; Maljaars, P.W.J. 2022
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to perform geriatric assessment in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to evaluate which IBD characteristics associate with deficits in geriatric... Show moreBACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to perform geriatric assessment in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to evaluate which IBD characteristics associate with deficits in geriatric assessment and the impact of deficits on disease burden (health-related quality of life).METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study including 405 consecutive outpatient patients with IBD aged >= 65 years. Somatic domain (comorbidity, polypharmacy, malnutrition), impairments in (instrumental) activities of daily living, physical capacity (handgrip strength, gait speed), and mental (depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment) and social domain (life-partner) were assessed. Deficits in geriatric assessment were defined as >= 2 abnormal domains; 2-3 moderate deficits and 4-5 severe deficits. Clinical (Harvey Bradshaw Index >4/partial Mayo Score >2) and biochemical (C-reactive protein >= 10 mg/L and/or fecal calprotectin >= 250 mu g/g) disease activity and disease burden (short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire) were assessed.RESULTS: Somatic domain (51.6%) and activities of daily living (43.0%) were most frequently impaired. A total of 160 (39.5%) patients had moderate deficits in their geriatric assessment; 32 (7.9%) severe. Clinical and biochemical disease activity associated with deficits (clinical: adjusted odds ratio, 2.191; 95% confidence interval, 1.284-3.743; P = .004; biochemical: adjusted odds ratio, 3.358; 95% confidence interval, 1.936-5.825; P <.001). Deficits in geriatric assessment independently associate with lower health-related quality of life.CONCLUSION: Deficits in geriatric assessment are highly prevalent in older patients with IBD. Patients with active disease are more prone to deficits, and deficits associate with lower health-related quality of life, indicating higher disease burden. Prospective data validating impact of frailty and geriatric assessment on outcomes are warranted to further improve treatment strategies. Show less
Background Long-term use of statins is associated with a small reduced risk of colorectal cancer but their mechanism of action is not well understood. While they are generally believed to act on... Show moreBackground Long-term use of statins is associated with a small reduced risk of colorectal cancer but their mechanism of action is not well understood. While they are generally believed to act on KRAS, we have previously proposed that they act via influencing the BMP pathway. The objective of this study was to look for associations between statin use and the risk of developing colorectal cancer of a particular molecular subtype. Methods By linking two registries unique to the Netherlands, 69,272 statin users and 94,753 controls were identified and, if they developed colorectal cancer, their specimens traced. Colorectal cancers were molecularly subtyped according to the expression of SMAD4 and the mutation status of KRAS and BRAF. Results Statin use was associated with a reduction in the risk of developing colorectal cancer regardless of molecular subtype (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.89) and a larger reduction in the risk of developing SMAD4-positive colorectal cancer (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.82). There was no relationship between statin use and the risk of developing colorectal cancer with a mutation in KRAS and/or BRAF. Conclusions Statin use is associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer with intact SMAD4 expression. Show less
Background Epidemiological studies and meta-analyses show an association between statin use and a reduced incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). We have shown that statins act on CRC through bone... Show moreBackground Epidemiological studies and meta-analyses show an association between statin use and a reduced incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). We have shown that statins act on CRC through bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling, but the exact cellular targets and underlying mechanism of statin action remain elusive. In this study, we set out to assess the influence of statins on global cancer cell signalling by performing an array-based kinase assay using immobilised kinase substrates spanning the entire human kinome. Methods CRC cells with or without Lovastatin treatment were used for kinome analysis. Findings on kinome arrays were further confirmed by immunoblotting with activity-specific antibodies. Experiments in different CRC cell lines using immunoblotting, siRNA-mediated knockdown and treatment with specific BMP inhibitor Noggin were performed. The relevance of in vitro findings was confirmed in xenografts and in CRC patients treated with Simvastatin. Results Kinome analysis can distinguish between non-specific, toxic effects caused by 10 mu M of Lovastatin and specific effects on cell signalling caused by 2 mu M Lovastatin. Statins induce upregulation of PTEN activity leading to downregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling. Treatment of cells with the specific BMP inhibitor Noggin as well as PTEN knockdown and transfection of cells with a constitutively active form of AKT abolishes the effect of Lovastatin on mTOR phosphorylation. Experiments in xenografts and in patients treated with Simvastatin confirm statin-mediated BMP pathway activation, activation of PTEN and downregulation of mTOR signalling. Conclusions Statins induce BMP-specific activation of PTEN and inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling in CRC. Show less
The focus of our research and this thesis was to investigate how statins are able to influence colorectal cancer formation and whether they might be used as a chemopreventive or adjuvant... Show moreThe focus of our research and this thesis was to investigate how statins are able to influence colorectal cancer formation and whether they might be used as a chemopreventive or adjuvant therapeutic agent in colorectal cancer. As we have shown, statins are able to influence colorectal cancer cells at different levels from the level of BMP receptor expression and receptor cycling, effects on the entire kinome in cancer cells, to epigenetic changes via its ability to alter gene promoter methylation. Our results suggest that statins could provide an interesting and favorable option for use in a chemopreventive or adjuvant setting. There are however aspects which have to be assessed before a drug is used for chemoprevention. The risk/benefit ratio should be assessed carefully, especially when administered to healthy individuals. Ideally, a chemopreventive agent should fulfill certain criteria. Most importantly, the drug must be effective and exhibit minimal side-effects. The safety profile of a drug and efficacy varies significantly between patients and is dependent on disease severity. Therefore, it is of great importance to critically assess the possible benefits of chemoprevention in comparison to the risk and inconvenience that could come with it. In the general population the lifetime risk of CRC is 5 % and the number needed to treat to prevent one CRC death will be very high. In patients at average risk, compliance in this asymptomatic cohort outside a study is likely to be low. The balance of risk versus benefit is more in favor of its use in high risk groups such as individuals especially susceptible to colorectal cancer because of environmental risk factors (diet high in animal protein and fat), patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and those with a hereditary predisposition to CRC. These include patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), Lynch Syndrome, Hereditary Non Polyposis Colon Carcinoma (HNPCC) and patients with a previous history of colorectal or adenomatous polyps. However, effective chemoprevention within one high risk group does not mean that the same chemoprevention is suitable for all groups. This stems from and also illustrates the fact that CRC is not one disease but a heterogeneous group of diseases with different underlying molecular mechanisms. Statins have an excellent safety profile, have been use for decades and have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease risk even in healthy individuals. Next to this we have shown that the use of statins has strong protective effect on the development of colorectal cancer expressing SMAD4 and does not increase the risk of developing CRC in SMAD4 negative tumors. Taken together our results suggest that statins could present a very interesting and favorable agent for use in a chemopreventive or adjuvant setting in CRC. Show less
Clinical data suggest that progestins have chemopreventive properties in the development of colorectal cancer. We set out to examine a potential protective effect of progestins and progesterone... Show moreClinical data suggest that progestins have chemopreventive properties in the development of colorectal cancer. We set out to examine a potential protective effect of progestins and progesterone signaling on colon cancer development. In normal and neoplastic intestinal tissue, we found that the progesterone receptor (PR) is not expressed. Expression was confined to sporadic mesenchymal cells. To analyze the influence of systemic progesterone receptor signaling, we crossed mice that lacked the progesterone receptor (PRKO) to the Apc(Min/+) mouse, a model for spontaneous intestinal polyposis. PRKO-Apc(Min/+) mice exhibited no change in polyp number, size or localization compared to Apc(Min/+). To examine effects of progestins on the intestinal epithelium that are independent of the PR, we treated mice with MPA. We found no effects of either progesterone or MPA on gross intestinal morphology or epithelial proliferation. Also, in rats treated with MPA, injection with the carcinogen azoxymethane did not result in a difference in the number or size of aberrant crypt foci, a surrogate end-point for adenoma development. We conclude that expression of the progesterone receptor is limited to cells in the intestinal mesenchyme. We did not observe any effect of progesterone receptor signaling or of progestin treatment in rodent models of intestinal tumorigenesis. Show less
In gastric cancer, a new epigenetic mechanism of tumour suppressor loss has been suggested where the histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is responsible for loss of... Show moreIn gastric cancer, a new epigenetic mechanism of tumour suppressor loss has been suggested where the histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is responsible for loss of expression of RUNX3. This is consistent with EZH2 upregulation in multiple cancer types being associated with poor prognosis. We investigated whether EZH2 influences the expression of RUNX3 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and whether this is independent of methylation. We determined protein and messenger RNA (mRNA) levels of EZH2 and RUNX3 and assessed RUNX3 methylation with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction using 72 human CRCs and 8 CRC cell lines. We assessed the effect of efficient RNA interference-mediated knockdown of EZH2 on RUNX3 levels, cell viability and H3K27 trimethylation of the RUNX3 promoter using chromatin immunoprecipitation. Despite higher levels of EZH2 and lower levels of RUNX3 in CRC specimens in general, no inverse correlation between EZH2 and RUNX3 in paired samples was found arguing against a major role for histone methylation in silencing RUNX3 in CRC. Conversely, downregulation of RUNX3 mRNA in the same tumours was associated with RUNX3 DNA methylation (P < 0.05). In cell lines, knockdown of EZH2 removed the repressive chromatin marks from RUNX3 but did not result in RUNX3 re-expression. However, it prevented the re-silencing of RUNX3 after the removal of demethylating agents. In conclusion, DNA methylation is primarily responsible for the transcriptional silencing of RUNX3 in CRC, but EZH2 and histone methylation are necessary for its methylation-dependent re-silencing after the removal of demethylating agents. These results would predict that inhibitors of EZH2 and histone methylation would enhance the effects of demethylating agents in cancer therapy. Show less
