Predicting the short- and long-term outcomes of extremely preterm infants remains a challenge. Multivariable prognostic models might be valuable tools for clinicians, parents, and policymakers for... Show morePredicting the short- and long-term outcomes of extremely preterm infants remains a challenge. Multivariable prognostic models might be valuable tools for clinicians, parents, and policymakers for providing accurate outcome estimates. In this perspective, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of using prognostic models in extremely preterm infants at population and individual levels. At a population level, these models could support the development of guidelines for decisions about treatment limits and may support policy processes such as benchmarking and resource allocation. At an individual level, these models may enhance prenatal counselling conversations by considering multiple variables and improving transparency about expected outcomes. Furthermore, they may improve consistency in projections shared with parents. For the development of prognostic models, we discuss important considerations such as predictor and outcome measure selection, clinical impact assessment, and generalizability. Lastly, future recommendations for developing and using prognostic models are suggested. Importantly, the purpose of a prognostic model should be clearly defined, and integrating these models into prenatal counselling requires thoughtful consideration. Show less
Boer, A. de; Proost, L. de; Vries, M. de; Hogeveen, M.; Verweij, E.J.T.; Geurtzen, R. 2023
ObjectiveA shared decision-making (SDM) approach is recommended for prenatal decisions at the limit of viability, with a guiding role for parental values. People born extremely premature experience... Show moreObjectiveA shared decision-making (SDM) approach is recommended for prenatal decisions at the limit of viability, with a guiding role for parental values. People born extremely premature experience the consequences of the decision made, but information about their perspectives on prenatal decisions is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to describe their perspectives on what is important in decision-making at the limit of viability.DesignSemi-structured focus group discussions were conducted, recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were independently analysed by two researchers in Atlas.ti.ResultsFour focus groups were conducted in the Netherlands, with five to six participants each, born between 240/7 and 300/7 weeks gestation in the period between 1965 and 2002. Considering their personal life experiences and how their extremely premature birth affected their families, the participants reflected on decision-making at the limit of viability. Various considerations were discussed and summarised into the following themes: anticipated parental regret, the wish to look at the baby directly after birth, to give the infant a chance at survival, quality of life, long-term outcomes for the infant and the family, and religious or spiritual considerations.ConclusionsInsights into the perspectives of adults born extremely premature deepened our understanding of values considered in decision-making at the limit of viability. Results point out the need for a more individualised prediction of the prognosis and more extensive information on the lifelong impact of an extremely premature birth on both the infant and the family. This could help future parents and healthcare professionals in value-laden decision-making. Show less
Geurtzen, R.; Proost, L. de; Verhagen, A.A.E.; Reiss, I.K.M.; Hogeveen, M.; Verweij, E.J.T. 2023
Aim: We explored professionals' views on sharing decision-making with parents before and after an extremely preterm birth and what healthcare professionals considered severe outcomes.Methods: A... Show moreAim: We explored professionals' views on sharing decision-making with parents before and after an extremely preterm birth and what healthcare professionals considered severe outcomes.Methods: A nationwide, multi-centre online survey was carried out among a wide range of perinatal healthcare professionals in the Netherlands from 4 November 2020 to 10 January 2021. The medical chairs of all nine Dutch Level III and IV perinatal centres helped to disseminate the survey link.Results: We received 769 survey responses. Most respondents (53%) preferred to place equal emphasis on two treatment options during shared prenatal decision-making: early intensive care or palliative comfort care. The majority (61%) wanted to include a conditional intensive care trial as a third treatment option, but 25% disagreed. Most (78%) felt that healthcare professionals were responsible for initiating postnatal conversations to justify continuing or withdrawing neonatal intensive care if complications were associated with poor outcomes. Finally, 43% were satisfied with the current definitions of severe long-term outcomes, 41% were unsure and there were numerous for a broader definition.Conclusion: Although Dutch professionals expressed diverse preferences on how to reach decisions about extremely premature infants, we observed a trend towards shared decision-making with parents. These results could inform future guidelines. Show less
Background: A Dutch committee for National Guidelines in Neonatology developed nineteen evidence- and consensus-based guidelines to be used in all Dutch neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The... Show moreBackground: A Dutch committee for National Guidelines in Neonatology developed nineteen evidence- and consensus-based guidelines to be used in all Dutch neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The primary goal was to make clinical practices more uniform and consistent. Objective: This study investigated to what extent the guidelines were implemented and which factors played a role in implementation. Study design: A mixed method study design was used to investigate both the level and the process of implementation. A nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional survey was performed using a validated instrument for measuring the level of implementation (Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaire, NoMAD). The number of implemented guidelines per NICU and the frequency and content of the amendments that NICUs made to the original consensus guidelines were analyzed. Through semi-structured interviews, perceived barriers and facilitators for implementation were explored. Participants: Fellows and neonatologists working at all ten Dutch level 3-4 NICUs were eligible. Results: On an average, NICUs implemented 12.6 (of 19) guidelines (range 6-17). The Normalization Process Scale was 54 (of 65). Main influencing factors impeding implementation were guideline-related (e.g., unpractical, lengthy guidelines) and personal (e.g., an active representative responsible for local implementation). Conclusion: The implementation of our guidelines appears to be successful. Ways for improvement can be distinguished in personal, guideline-related and external factors. Empowerment of local representatives was considered most essential. Show less
Verweij, E.J.; Proost, L. de; Hogeveen, M.; Reiss, I.K.M.; Verhagen, A.A.E.; Geurtzen, R. 2022
Objective: There is no international consensus on what type of guideline is preferred for care at the limit of viability. We aimed to conceptualize what type of guideline is preferred by Dutch... Show moreObjective: There is no international consensus on what type of guideline is preferred for care at the limit of viability. We aimed to conceptualize what type of guideline is preferred by Dutch healthcare professionals: 1) none; 2) gestational-age-based; 3) gestational-age based-plus; or 4) prognosis-based via a survey instrument. Additional questions were asked to explore the grey zone and attitudes towards treatment variation.Finding: 769 surveys were received. Most of the respondents (72.8%) preferred a gestational age-based-plus guideline. Around 50% preferred 24(+0/7) weeks gestational age as the lower limit of the grey zone, whereas 26(+0/7) weeks was the most preferred upper limit. Professionals considered treatment variation acceptable when it is based upon parental values, but unacceptable when it is based upon the hospital's policy or the physician's opinion.Conclusion: In contrast to the current Dutch guideline, our results suggest that there is a preference to take into account individual factors besides gestational age.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. Show less
Heuvel, J.F.M. van den; Hogeveen, M.; Holzik, M.L.; Heijst, A.F.J. van; Bekker, M.N.; Geurtzen, R. 2022
Background In case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks of gestation, both early intensive care and palliative comfort care for the neonate are considered treatment options. Prenatal... Show moreBackground In case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks of gestation, both early intensive care and palliative comfort care for the neonate are considered treatment options. Prenatal counseling, preferably using shared decision making, is needed to agree on the treatment option in case labor progresses. This article described the development of a digital decision aid (DA) to support pregnant women, partners and clinicians in prenatal counseling for imminent extreme premature labor. Methods This DA is developed following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The Dutch treatment guideline and the Dutch recommendations for prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity were used as basis. Development of the first prototype was done by expert clinicians and patients, further improvements were done after alpha testing with involved clinicians, patients and other experts (n = 12), and beta testing with non-involved clinicians and patients (n = 15). Results The final version includes information, probabilities and figures depending on users' preferences. Furthermore, it elicits patient values and provides guidance to aid parents and professionals in making a decision for either early intensive care or palliative comfort care in threatening extreme premature delivery. Conclusion A decision aid was developed to support prenatal counseling regarding the decision on early intensive care versus palliative comfort care in case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks gestation. It was well accepted by parents and healthcare professionals. Our multimedia, digital DA is openly available online to support prenatal counseling and personalized, shared decision-making in imminent extreme premature labor. Show less
Geurtzen, R.; Heuvel, J.F.M. van den; Huisman, J.J.; Holzik, E.M.L.; Bekker, M.N.; Hogeveen, M. 2021
Objective To describe levels of perceived shared decision making (SDM), decisional conflict (DC), and decision regret (DR) in prenatal counseling by pregnant women, partners, neonatologists, and... Show moreObjective To describe levels of perceived shared decision making (SDM), decisional conflict (DC), and decision regret (DR) in prenatal counseling by pregnant women, partners, neonatologists, and obstetricians regarding decision-making around imminent extreme premature birth in which a decision about palliative comfort care versus early intensive care had to be made. Study design Multicenter, cross-sectional study using surveys to determine perceived SDM at imminent extreme premature birth in parents and physicians, and to determine DC and DR in parents. Results In total, 73 participants from 22 prenatal counseling sessions were included (21 pregnant women, 20 partners, 14 obstetricians, 18 neonatologists). High perceived levels of SDM were found (median 82,2), and low levels of DC (median 23,4) and DR at one month (median 12, 5). Conclusions Reported levels of self-perceived SDM in the setting of prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity were high, by both the parents and the physicians. Levels of DC and DR were low. Show less
Geurtzen, R.; Heijst, A.F.J. van; Draaisma, J.M.T.; Kuijpers, L.J.M.K.; Woiski, M.; Scheepers, H.C.J.; ... ; Hogeveen, M. 2019
