Background: Failure of locoregional control is the main cause of recurrence in advanced head and neck cancer. This multi-center trial aims to improve outcome in two ways. Firstly, by redistribution... Show moreBackground: Failure of locoregional control is the main cause of recurrence in advanced head and neck cancer. This multi-center trial aims to improve outcome in two ways. Firstly, by redistribution of the radiation dose to the metabolically most FDG-PET avid part of the tumour. Hereby, a biologically more effective dose distribution might be achieved while simultaneously sparing normal tissues. Secondly, by improving patient selection. Both cisplatin and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) antibodies like Cetuximab in combination with Radiotherapy (RT) are effective in enhancing tumour response. However, it is unknown which patients will benefit from either agent in combination with irradiation. We will analyze the predictive value of biological markers and Zr-89-Cetuximab uptake for treatment outcome of chemoradiation with Cetuximab or cisplatin to improve patient selection.Methods: ARTFORCE is a randomized phase II trial for 268 patients with a factorial 2 by 2 design: cisplatin versus Cetuximab and standard RT versus redistributed RT. Cisplatin is dosed weekly 40 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks. Cetuximab is dosed 250mg/m(2) weekly (loading dose 400 mg/m(2)) for 6 weeks. The standard RT regimen consists of elective RT up to 54.25 Gy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to 70 Gy in 35 fractions in 6 weeks. Redistributed adaptive RT consists of elective RT up to 54.25 Gy with a SIB between 64-80 Gy in 35 fractions in 6 weeks with redistributed dose to the gross tumour volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV), and adaptation of treatment for anatomical changes in the third week of treatment.Patients with locally advanced, biopsy confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, oral cavity or hypopharynx are eligible.Primary endpoints are: locoregional recurrence free survival at 2 years, correlation of the median Zr-89-cetuximab uptake and biological markers with treatment specific outcome, and toxicity. Secondary endpoints are quality of life, swallowing function preservation, progression free and overall survival.Discussion: The objective of the ARTFORCE Head and Neck trial is to determine the predictive value of biological markers and Zr-89-Cetuximab uptake, as it is unknown how to select patients for the appropriate concurrent agent. Also we will determine if adaptive RT and dose redistribution improve locoregional control without increasing toxicity. Show less
Hoebers, F.; Heemsbergen, W.; Moor, S.; Lopez, M.; Klop, M.; Tesselaar, M.; Rasch, C. 2011
Purpose: To analyze the effectiveness and toxicity of reirradiation (re-RT) for head-and-neck cancer.Methods and Materials: A retrospective data analysis was performed of 58 patients who underwent... Show morePurpose: To analyze the effectiveness and toxicity of reirradiation (re-RT) for head-and-neck cancer.Methods and Materials: A retrospective data analysis was performed of 58 patients who underwent re-RT with curative intent. Re-RT was given as definitive treatment in 53% of patients, whereas salvage surgery preceded reirradiation in 47%. The median cumulative RT dose was 119 Gy (range, 76-140). Concurrent chemotherapy was administered with re-RT (CRT) in 57% of patients. Event-free survival was defined as survival without recurrence and without serious toxicity (>= Grade 3).Results: Median follow-up was 57 months (range, 9-140). Locoregional (LR) control was 50% at 2 and 5 years. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 42% and 34%. The following factors were associated with improved OS: postoperative re-RT (vs. primary re-RT), treatment with RT only (vs. CRT) and interval >3 years between previous RT and re-RT. For patients treated with postoperative re-RT and definitive re-RT, the 5-year OS was 49% and 20%, respectively. Patients treated with CRT had a 5-year OS of 13%. Serious (late) toxicity >= Grade 3 was observed in 20 of 47 evaluable patients (43%). Three cases of treatment-related death were recorded. The 2-and 5-year serious toxicity-free interval was 59% and 55%, respectively. Associated with increased risk of serious toxicity were CRT and higher re-RT dose. The event-free survival rates at 2 and 5 years were 34% and 31%, respectively.Conclusions: Re-RT in head-and-neck cancer is associated with poor survival rates of 13-20% in patients with inoperable disease treated with primary (chemo-) re-RT. For this subgroup, however, no other curative options are available. Long-term disease control and survival can be achieved in patients who receive re-RT as an adjunct to surgical resection. The rates of serious toxicity after re-RT are high, with an incidence of approximately 45% at 5 years. Approximately 1 in 3 patients survived re-RT without recurrence and severe complications. (c) 2011 Elsevier Inc. Show less
Introduction: To advise laryngeal carcinoma patients on the most appropriate form of treatment, a tool to predict survival and local control is needed.Materials and methods: We performed a... Show moreIntroduction: To advise laryngeal carcinoma patients on the most appropriate form of treatment, a tool to predict survival and local control is needed.Materials and methods: We performed a population-based cohort study on 994 laryngeal carcinoma patients, treated with RT from 1977 until 2008. Two nomograms were developed and validated. Performance of the models is expressed as the Area Under the Curve (AUC).Results: Unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival were low hemoglobin level, male sex, high T-status, nodal involvement, older age, lower EQD(2T) (total radiation dose corrected for fraction dose and overall treatment time), and non-glottic tumor. All factors except tumor location were prognostic for local control. The AUCs were 0.73 for overall survival and 0.67 for local control. External validation of the survival model yielded AUCs of 0.68, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.71 for the Leuven (n = 109), the VU Amsterdam (n = 178), the Manchester (n = 403) and the NKI cohort (n = 205), respectively, while the validation procedure for the local control model resulted in AUCs of 0.70, 0.71, 0.72 and 0.62. The resulting nomograms were made available on the website www.predictcancer.org.Conclusions: For patients with a laryngeal carcinoma treated with RT alone, we have developed visual, easy-to-use nomograms for the prediction of overall survival and primary local control. These models have been successfully validated in four external centers. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 100 (2011) 108-115 Show less
