Objectives To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.Methods An international task force was formed... Show moreObjectives To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.Methods An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.Results The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3–6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.Conclusions These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost. Show less
Baraliakos, X.; Deodhar, A.; Dougados, M.; Gensler, L.S.; Molto, A.; Ramiro, S.; ... ; Heijde, D. van der 2022
Objective To assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bimekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods Patients with active AS who completed the dose... Show moreObjective To assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bimekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods Patients with active AS who completed the dose-ranging, 48-week BE AGILE randomized controlled trial were eligible to participate in an open-label extension (OLE) study, in which patients received 160 mg of bimekizumab every 4 weeks. We present the safety and efficacy results through 156 weeks. Missing efficacy data were imputed using nonresponder imputation analysis for binary outcomes and multiple imputation for continuous outcomes. Results From weeks 0-156, 280 of 303 patients (exposure-adjusted incidence rate 141.0 per 100 patient-years) experienced >= 1 treatment-emergent adverse event; the most frequent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (8.1 per 100 patient-years) and upper respiratory tract infection (5.0 per 100 patient-years). Additionally, 67 of 303 patients (9.8 per 100 patient-years) had mild to moderate localized fungal infections (28 of 303 patients had Candida infections [3.7 per 100 patient-years] and 23 of 303 patients had oral candidiasis [3.0 per 100 patient-years]), 10 patients had serious infections (1.3 per 100 patient-years), and no cases of active tuberculosis were reported. Active inflammatory bowel disease (1.1 per 100 patient-years), anterior uveitis (0.7 per 100 patient-years), and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (0.3 per 100 patient-years) were infrequent. The efficacy of bimekizumab treatment demonstrated at week 48 was sustained in the OLE study. At week 156, nonresponder imputation analysis showed that 53.7% of patients (72.6% of observed cases) met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for 40% improvement and 28.0% of patients (37.9% of observed cases) achieved partial remission; Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Scores were reduced from baseline (mean +/- SEM 3.9 +/- 0.1) to week 48 (2.1 +/- 0.1) and week 156 (1.9 +/- 0.1) (multiple imputation). Patients showed sustained improvements in pain, fatigue, physical function, and health-related quality of life. Conclusion The safety profile of bimekizumab was found to be consistent with previously demonstrated findings, and no new safety signals were identified. The efficacy of bimekizumab in patients with AS was sustained through 3 years of treatment. Show less
Baraliakos, X.; Deodhar, A.; Dougados, M.; Gensler, L.S.; Molto, A.; Ramiro, S.; ... ; Heijde, D. van der 2022
ObjectiveTo assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bimekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsPatients with active AS who completed the dose-ranging,... Show moreObjectiveTo assess the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bimekizumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsPatients with active AS who completed the dose-ranging, 48-week BE AGILE randomized controlled trial were eligible to participate in an open-label extension (OLE) study, in which patients received 160 mg of bimekizumab every 4 weeks. We present the safety and efficacy results through 156 weeks. Missing efficacy data were imputed using nonresponder imputation analysis for binary outcomes and multiple imputation for continuous outcomes.ResultsFrom weeks 0–156, 280 of 303 patients (exposure-adjusted incidence rate 141.0 per 100 patient-years) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; the most frequent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (8.1 per 100 patient-years) and upper respiratory tract infection (5.0 per 100 patient-years). Additionally, 67 of 303 patients (9.8 per 100 patient-years) had mild to moderate localized fungal infections (28 of 303 patients had Candida infections [3.7 per 100 patient-years] and 23 of 303 patients had oral candidiasis [3.0 per 100 patient-years]), 10 patients had serious infections (1.3 per 100 patient-years), and no cases of active tuberculosis were reported. Active inflammatory bowel disease (1.1 per 100 patient-years), anterior uveitis (0.7 per 100 patient-years), and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (0.3 per 100 patient-years) were infrequent. The efficacy of bimekizumab treatment demonstrated at week 48 was sustained in the OLE study. At week 156, nonresponder imputation analysis showed that 53.7% of patients (72.6% of observed cases) met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for 40% improvement and 28.0% of patients (37.9% of observed cases) achieved partial remission; Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Scores were reduced from baseline (mean ± SEM 3.9 ± 0.1) to week 48 (2.1 ± 0.1) and week 156 (1.9 ± 0.1) (multiple imputation). Patients showed sustained improvements in pain, fatigue, physical function, and health-related quality of life.ConclusionThe safety profile of bimekizumab was found to be consistent with previously demonstrated findings, and no new safety signals were identified. The efficacy of bimekizumab in patients with AS was sustained through 3 years of treatment. Show less
Ortolan, A.; Ramiro, S.; Ramonda, R.; Heijde, D. van der 2022
Objectives: The alternative ASDAS (altASDAS) is an index that can be used when patient global assessment is unavailable. Our aim was to test the truth and discrimination aspects according to... Show moreObjectives: The alternative ASDAS (altASDAS) is an index that can be used when patient global assessment is unavailable. Our aim was to test the truth and discrimination aspects according to OMERACT filter 2.0 of the altASDAS in an external cohort. Methods: Cohorts from the COAST trials of ixekizumab (COAST-V, -W, -X; 16-week primary endpoint) enrolling radiographic/non-radiographic axial SpA patients were pooled. The ASDAS [original formula with patient global assessment (PGA)] and altASDAS were calculated. Truth was assessed by agreement with the continuous ASDAS [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)] and ASDAS disease activity (DA) states (weighted kappa), Bland-Altman plots [mean difference (MD) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA)] and Pearson's correlations between altASDAS/ASDAS and other constructs. Discrimination was tested by the ability of altASDAS to distinguish high/low DA according to nocturnal pain >6/10 as an external anchor and agreement (kappa) with ASDAS in major improvement (MI) and clinically important improvement (CII). Results: A total of 958 patients were included. For truth, agreement with ASDAS was very good (ICC = 0.99, kappa = 0.91), MD with ASDAS was 0.03 (95% LoA -0.31-0.24) and correlation coefficients of altASDAS with related constructs were within a prespecified 0.3-wide band around those between ASDAS and the same construct. For discrimination, the altASDAS discriminated between DA states and agreed with ASDAS response (kappa MI = 0.91, CII = 0.93). Conclusions: The altASDAS was truthful and discriminative in an external cohort and as such has been fully validated to be used in cases when PGA is unavailable. Show less
Objective: To update the evidence on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) to inform the 2022 update of... Show moreObjective: To update the evidence on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) to inform the 2022 update of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS-EULAR) recommendations for the management of axSpA. Methods: Systematic literature review (2016-2021) on efficacy and safety of bDMARDs in axSpA (radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA)/non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA)). Eligible study designs included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), strategy trials and observational studies (the latter only for safety and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations). All relevant efficacy/safety outcomes were included. Results: In total, 148 publications were included. Efficacy of golimumab and certolizumab was confirmed. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) biosimilar-originator equivalence was demonstrated. RCT (n=15) data on efficacy of interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) demonstrated clinically relevant effects (risk ratio vs placebo to achieve ASAS40 response 1.3-15.3 (r-axSpA, n=9), 1.4-2.1 (nr-axSpA, n=2)). Efficacy of secukinumab/ixekizumab was demonstrated in TNFi-naive and TNFi-inadequate responders. IL-23 and IL-12/23 inhibitors (risankizumab/ustekinumab) failed to show relevant benefits. Tapering of TNFi by spacing was non-inferior to standard-dose treatment. The first axSpA treat-to-target trial did not meet its primary endpoint, but showed improvements in secondary outcomes. No new risks were identified with TNFi use in observational studies (data lacking for IL-17i). Secukinumab (n=1) and etanercept (n=2) were associated with increased risk of uveitis in observational studies compared to monoclonal TNFi. Conclusions: New evidence supports the efficacy and safety of TNFi (originators/biosimilars) and IL-17i in r-axSpA and nr-axSpA, while IL-23i failed to show relevant effects. Observational studies are needed to confirm long-term IL-17i safety. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021257588 Show less
Ramiro, S.; Nikiphorou, E.; Sepriano, A.; Ortolan, A.; Webers, C.; Baraliakos, X.; ... ; Heijde, D. van der 2022
Objectives To update the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods Following the EULAR... Show moreObjectives To update the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods Following the EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures, two systematic literature reviews were conducted on non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment of axSpA. In a task force meeting, the evidence was presented, discussed, and overarching principles and recommendations were updated, followed by voting. Results Five overarching principles and 15 recommendations with a focus on personalised medicine were agreed: eight remained unchanged from the previous recommendations; three with minor edits on nomenclature; two with relevant updates (#9, 12); two newly formulated (#10, 11). The first five recommendations focus on treatment target and monitoring, non-pharmacological management and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-choice pharmacological treatment. Recommendations 6-8 deal with analgesics and discourage long-term glucocorticoids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for pure axial involvement. Recommendation 9 describes the indication of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs, that is, tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i)) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs, ie, Janus kinase inhibitors) for patients who have Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score >= 2.1 and failed >= 2 NSAIDs and also have either elevated C reactive protein, MRI inflammation of sacroiliac joints or radiographic sacroiliitis. Current practice is to start a TNFi or IL-17i. Recommendation 10 addresses extramusculoskeletal manifestations with TNF monoclonal antibodies preferred for recurrent uveitis or inflammatory bowel disease, and IL-17i for significant psoriasis. Treatment failure should prompt re-evaluation of the diagnosis and consideration of the presence of comorbidities (#11). If active axSpA is confirmed, switching to another b/tsDMARD is recommended (#12). Tapering, rather than immediate discontinuation of a bDMARD, can be considered in patients in sustained remission (#13). The last recommendations (#14, 15) deal with surgery and spinal fractures. Conclusions The 2022 ASAS-EULAR recommendations provide up-to-date guidance on the management of patients with axSpA. Show less
Objective: To update the evidence of non-biological treatments for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), as a basis for the 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society-European Alliance... Show moreObjective: To update the evidence of non-biological treatments for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), as a basis for the 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS-EULAR) recommendations for the management of axSpA. Methods: A systematic literature review (2016-2021) on efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological pharmacological treatments was performed, up to 1 January 2022. The research question was formulated according to the PICO format: Population: adult patients with r-axSpA and nr-axSpA; Intervention: non-pharmacological and non-biological pharmacological treatments; Comparator: active comparator or placebo; Outcomes: all relevant efficacy and safety outcomes. Type of studies included were: randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies (for efficacy of non-pharmacological treatments, and safety), qualitative studies. Cohen's effect size (ES) was calculated for non-pharmacological and risk ratio (RR) for pharmacological treatments. Results: Of 107 publications included, 63 addressed non-pharmacological interventions, including education (n=8) and exercise (n=20). The ES for education on disease activity, function, mobility was small to moderate (eg. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), ES: 0.06-0.59). Exercise had moderate to high ES on these outcomes (eg. BASDAI, ES: 0.14-1.43). Six RCTs on targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) showed efficacy of tofacitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib (phase 2 only) in r-axSpA (range RR vs placebo for ASAS20: 1.91-3.10), while apremilast and nilotinib were not efficacious. Studies on conventional synthetic DMARDs (n=3), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, n=8) and other drugs (n=12) did not provide new evidence on efficacy/safety (efficacy of NSAIDs confirmed; limited efficacy of short-term glucocorticoids in one RCT). Conclusions Education, exercise and NSAIDs confirmed to be efficacious in axSpA. JAKi were proved efficacious in r-axSpA. Show less
Webers, C.; Kiltz, U.; Braun, J.; Heijde, D. van der; Boonen, A. 2022
Objective To investigate the effect of pharmacological treatment of SpA on depressive symptoms and explore whether this effect differs between drug classes. Methods Data from the observational... Show moreObjective To investigate the effect of pharmacological treatment of SpA on depressive symptoms and explore whether this effect differs between drug classes. Methods Data from the observational Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index Validation Study were used. Patients were assessed at baseline and after initiation of NSAIDs/conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs)/TNF inhibitors (TNFis). Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale [HADS-D; 0-21 (best-worst)]. Covariables included demographics and disease characteristics, including disease activity [Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)/BASDAI]. The change in HADS-D from baseline was compared between treatments (NSAIDs/csDMARDs/TNFis) with analysis of variance and multivariable regression analysis. Results A total of 304 patients were included; 102/45/157 initiated NSAIDs/csDMARDs/TNFis and 260 (85%) / 44 (15%) had axial/peripheral SpA. At baseline, the mean HADS-D was 6.9 (s.d. 4.2); 126 (42%) were possibly depressed (HADS-D >= 8) and 66 (22%) were probably depressed (HADS-D >= 11). At follow-up, depressive symptoms significantly improved in all treatment groups. In multivariable regression without disease activity measures, initiating TNFis compared with NSAIDs was associated with greater improvement in depressive symptoms [beta = -1.27 (95% CI -2.23, -0.32)] and lower odds of possible depression at follow-up [odds ratio 0.47 (95% CI 0.23, 0.94)]. This association was attenuated after additional adjustment for disease activity (ASDAS/BASDAI) but not CRP. csDMARDs did not differ from NSAIDs regarding their effect on HADS-D. Between-drug class results were confirmed in axial SpA (axSpA), although less clear in peripheral SpA. Conclusion Treatment of active SpA also improves depressive symptoms. Especially in axSpA, TNFis have a greater effect than NSAIDs, which is mainly explained by a stronger effect on disease activity. We found no evidence for a direct link between CRP-mediated inflammation and depressive symptoms in SpA. Show less
Capelusnik, D.; Benavent, D.; Heijde, D. van der; Landewe, R.; Poddubnyy, D.; Tubergen, A. van; ... ; Ramiro, S. 2022
Objective To summarize evidence on the relationship between early treatment (definition based on symptom/disease duration or radiographic damage) and treatment clinical response in patients with... Show moreObjective To summarize evidence on the relationship between early treatment (definition based on symptom/disease duration or radiographic damage) and treatment clinical response in patients with SpA. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted in studies on SpA patients treated with NSAIDs or biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs addressing the impact of symptom/disease duration or presence of radiographic damage on treatment response assessed by any disease activity outcome. For categorical outcomes, relative risk, relative risk ratio and number needed to treat were calculated, and for continuous outcomes, differences in differences, to compare groups stratified based on symptom/disease duration or the presence of radiographic damage. Results From the 8769 articles retrieved, 25 were included and 2 added by hand-search, all in axial SpA (axSpA), most of them with low risk of bias. Twenty-one studies compared groups based on symptom duration (n = 6) or disease duration (n = 15) and seven studies based on absence/presence of radiographic damage (two studies used two comparisons). When early axSpA was defined by symptom duration (<5 years) in randomized controlled trials, early treatment was associated with better outcomes in patients with non-radiographic axSpA [n = 2, ASAS40 relative risk ratio 5.24 (95% CI 1.12, 24.41) and 1.52 (0.60, 3.87)] but not in radiographic axSpA (n = 1) [ASAS20 0.96 (0.53-1.73)]. When early axSpA was defined based on disease duration or radiographic damage, no differences were found between groups. Conclusion Evidence towards better outcomes in early axSpA is very limited and restricted to non-radiographic axSpA and <5 years symptom duration. When early axSpA is defined based on disease duration or radiographic damage, no differences in response to treatment are found. Show less
Kastrati, K.; Aletaha, D.; Burmester, G.R.; Chwala, E.; Dejaco, C.; Dougados, M.; ... ; Kerschbaumer, A. 2022
Objectives Informing an international task force updating the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) selectively targeting... Show moreObjectives Informing an international task force updating the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) selectively targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway in the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Methods A systematic literature research of all publications on IL-6 axis inhibition with bDMARDs published between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in clinical trials including their long-term extensions and observational studies. Meeting abstracts from ACR, EULAR conferences and results on clinicaltrials.gov were taken into consideration. Results 187 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Evidence for positive effect of IL-6 inhibition was available in various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, cytokine release syndrome due to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Newcomers like satralizumab and anti-IL-6 ligand antibody siltuximab have expanded therapeutic approaches for Castleman's disease and neuromyelitis optica, respectively. IL-6 inhibition did not provide therapeutic benefits in psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and certain connective tissue diseases. In COVID-19, tocilizumab (TCZ) has proven to be therapeutic in advanced disease. Safety outcomes did not differ from other bDMARDs, except higher risks of diverticulitis and lower gastrointestinal perforations. Inconsistent results were observed in several studies investigating the risk for infections when comparing TCZ to TNF-inhibitors. Conclusion IL-6 inhibition is effective for treatment of several inflammatory diseases with a safety profile that is widely comparable to other bDMARDs. Show less
Baraliakos, X.; Gossec, L.; McInnes, I.; Kerschbaumer, A.; Wit, M. de; Dougados, M.; ... ; Smolen, J.S. 2022
Background: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the... Show moreBackground: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6R alpha antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway. Methods: A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document. Results: The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring. Conclusions: The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers. Show less
Burgos-Vargas, R.; Loyola-Sanchez, A.; Ramiro, S.; Reding-Bernal, A.; Alvarez-Hernandez, E.; Heijde, D. van der; Vazquez-Mellado, J. 2022
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of infliximab versus placebo in the treatment of patients with juvenile-onset spondyloarthritis (JoSpA). Methods: Phase III, randomized, double-blind,... Show moreObjective: To assess the efficacy and safety of infliximab versus placebo in the treatment of patients with juvenile-onset spondyloarthritis (JoSpA). Methods: Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 12 weeks that included patients <= 18 years old with JoSpA not responding to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sulfasalazine, or methotrexate. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the infusion of infliximab 5mg/kg or placebo; completers entered then an open-label extension (OLE) period of 42 weeks. The primary endpoint was the number of active joints. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of disease activity, tender entheses, spinal mobility, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Functional Index, and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). Results: We randomized 12 patients to infliximab and 14 to placebo. No significant differences were found between groups at baseline. At week 12, the mean number of active joints was 1.4 (SD 2.4) in the infliximab group and 4.1 (SD 3.0) in the placebo group (p = 0.0002). A repeated-measures mixed model analysis that included all endpoints in the study demonstrated sustained favourable outcomes of infliximab for active joints, tender joints, swollen joints, and tender enthesis counts, as well as for CHAQ and CRP (p < 0.01). Adverse events were more frequent in the infliximab group, including infections and infusion reactions, but none of them was serious. Conclusion: Infliximab is efficacious for patients with JoSpA with an inadequate response to conventional treatment. No serious adverse events with the use of infliximab were observed. Show less
Gossec, L.; Baraliakos, X.; McInnes, I.; Kerschbaumer, A.; Wit, M. de; Dougados, M.; ... ; Smolen, J.S. 2022
Aim: To identify all possible definitions of "early SpA" employed in the literature, including "early axial SpA (axSpA)" and "early peripheral SpA (pSpA)".Methods: A systematic literature review... Show moreAim: To identify all possible definitions of "early SpA" employed in the literature, including "early axial SpA (axSpA)" and "early peripheral SpA (pSpA)".Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for studies that included any mention of "early SpA" or its subtypes. The proportion of studies including a definition was calculated, and the different definitions were assessed.Results: Out of 9651 titles identified, 336 publications reporting data from 183 studies were included. Over time, an increasing number of publications were identified. In total, 114 (62%) studies reported a specific definition: 33% of them based it on symptom duration, 31% on radiographic damage, 28% on disease duration, 5% on both symptom/disease duration and radiographic damage, and 3% on other aspects. Overall, 61 (33%) studies included the term "early axSpA", whereas 60 (33%) included "early ankylosing spondylitis (AS)". Regarding the studies that referred to "early axSpA", the most used definition was symptom/disease duration <5 years, whereas for "early AS" was symptom/disease duration <10 years. After 2010, the definition of "early axSpA" based on the absence of radiographic sacroiliitis was less used compared to before 2010 (17% vs 38%).Conclusion: Over time, the term "early SpA" and its subtypes is increasingly used. More than one third of the studies did not include a definition of the term and the studies reporting one showed a large heterogeneity. These results emphasize the need for a standardised definition of early SpA. Show less
Deodhar, A.; Bosch, F. van den; Poddubnyy, D.; Maksymowych, W.P.; Heijde, D. van der; Kim, T.H.; ... ; Song, I.H. 2022
Background Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in non... Show moreBackground Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has been shown to be effective in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.Methods The SELECT-AXIS 2 non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis study was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 113 sites across 23 countries (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, and the USA). Eligible adults had active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, with objective signs of inflammation based on MRI or elevated C-reactive protein and an inadequate response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo using interactive response technology. Random treatment assignment was stratified by MRI inflammation in the sacroiliac joints and screening high-sensitivity C-reactive protein status (MRI-positive and C-reactive protein-positive, MRI-positive and C-reactive protein-negative, and MRI-negative and C-reactive protein-positive) and previous exposure to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (yes vs no). Treatment assignment was masked from patients, investigators, study site personnel, and the study sponsor. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 (ASAS40) response at week 14. Analyses were performed on the full analysis set of patients, who underwent random allocation and received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04169373.Findings Between Nov 26, 2019, and May 20, 2021, 314 patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis were enrolled into the study, and 313 received study drug (156 in the upadacitinib group and 157 in the placebo group); 295 (94%) patients (145 in the upadacitinib group and 150 in the placebo group) received treatment for the full 14 weeks. A significantly higher ASAS40 response rate was achieved with upadacitinib compared with placebo at week 14 (70 [45%] of 156 patients vs 35 [23%] of 157 patients; p<0.0001; treatment difference 22%, 95% CI 12-32). The rate of adverse events up to week 14 was similar in the upadacitinib group (75 [48%] of 156 patients) and placebo group (72 [46%] of 157 patients). Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation of study drug occurred in four (3%) of 156 patients in the upadacitinib group and two (1%) of 157 patients in the placebo group. Few patients had serious infections or herpes zoster in either treatment group (each event occurred in two [1%] of 156 patients in the upadacitinib group and one [1%] of 157 patients in the placebo group). Five (3%) of 156 patients in the upadacitinib group had neutropenia; no events of neutropenia occurred in the placebo group. No opportunistic infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolic events, or deaths were reported with upadacitinib treatment.Interpretation Upadacitinib significantly improved the signs and symptoms of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis compared with placebo at week 14. These findings support the potential of upadacitinib as a new therapeutic option in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Heijde, D. van der; Baraliakos, X.; Sieper, J.; Deodhar, A.; Inman, R.D.; Kameda, H.; ... ; Song, I.H. 2022
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with an inadequate response (IR) to biological disease... Show moreObjectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with an inadequate response (IR) to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Methods: Adults with active AS who met modified New York criteria and had an IR to one or two bDMARDs (tumour necrosis factor or interleukin-17 inhibitors) were randomised 1:1 to oral upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 (ASAS40) response at week 14. Sequentially tested secondary endpoints included Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity score, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI spine inflammation score, total back pain, nocturnal back pain, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index and Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score. Results are reported from the 14-week double-blind treatment period. Results: A total of 420 patients with active AS were randomised (upadacitinib 15 mg, n=211; placebo, n=209). Significantly more patients achieved the primary endpoint of ASAS40 at week 14 with upadacitinib vs placebo (45% vs 18%; p<0.0001). Statistically significant improvements were observed with upadacitinib vs placebo for all multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints (p<0.0001). Adverse events were reported for 41% of upadacitinib-treated and 37% of placebo-treated patients through week 14. No events of malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism or deaths were reported with upadacitinib. Conclusion: Upadacitinib 15 mg was significantly more effective than placebo over 14 weeks of treatment in bDMARD-IR patients with active AS. No new safety risks were identified with upadacitinib. Show less
Heijde, D. van der; Deodhar, A.; Maksymowych, W.P.; Sieper, J.; Bosch, F. van den; Kim, T.H.; ... ; Song, I.H. 2022
Introduction Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has not been previously reported. Methods In SELECT-AXIS 1, patients receiving placebo... Show moreIntroduction Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has not been previously reported. Methods In SELECT-AXIS 1, patients receiving placebo were switched to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily at week 14 while patients initially randomised to upadacitinib continued their regimen through week 104. Efficacy was assessed using as-observed (AO) and non-responder imputation (NRI). Results Of 187 patients randomised, 144 patients (77%) completed week 104. Among patients receiving continuous upadacitinib, 85.9% (AO) and 65.6% (NRI) achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 response (ASAS40) at week 104. Similar magnitude of ASAS40 responses were observed among patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib (88.7% and 63.8%, respectively). The mean change from baseline to week 104 in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI spine and sacroiliac joint inflammation scores were -7.3 and -5.3, respectively, in the continuous upadacitinib group and -7.9 and -4.9 in the placebo-to-upadacitinib switch group. The mean (95% CI) change from baseline to week 104 in the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score was 0.7 (0.3, 1.1) in the total group. Adverse event rate was 242.7/100 patient-years. No serious infections, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, lymphoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, or gastrointestinal perforations were observed. Conclusions Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily showed sustained and consistent efficacy over 2 years for ASAS40 and other clinically relevant endpoints. A low rate of radiographic progression was observed and no new safety findings were observed. Show less
Stal, R.; Baraliakos, X.; Heijde, D. van der; Gaalen, F. van; Ramiro, S.; Berg, R. van den; ... ; Sepriano, A. 2022
Objectives To investigate the associations between MRI detected vertebral corner inflammation (VCI) and vertebral corner fat deposition (VCFD) on whole spine low-dose CT scan (ldCT) detected... Show moreObjectives To investigate the associations between MRI detected vertebral corner inflammation (VCI) and vertebral corner fat deposition (VCFD) on whole spine low-dose CT scan (ldCT) detected syndesmophyte formation and growth. Methods Patients from the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis cohort underwent MRI (baseline, 1 year and 2 years) and ldCT (baseline and 2 years). MR images were scored by three readers for VCI and VCFD, MRI patterns were defined by presence of VCI and/or VCFD over 2 years. LdCT images were scored by two central readers for presence and size of syndesmophytes and change was calculated for new or new/grown syndesmophytes. Multilevel generalised estimated equations were used to test the associations between VCI and VCFD and syndesmophyte development. Results Fifty radiographic patients with axial spondyloarthritis were included (mean age 49 years, 86% male, 78% HLA-B27+). Absence of both VCI and VCFD protected against syndesmophyte development (ORs 0.36-0.37). Presence of VCI and/or VCFD increased the risk of syndesmophyte development (ORs 1.73-2.60). Out of all corners with a new or new/grown syndesmophyte, 47% of corners according to reader 1 and 44% according to reader 2 had neither VCI nor VCFD preceding the bone formation. Conclusions VCI and VCFD were positively associated with syndesmophyte development. This has been shown for the first time for syndesmophytes detected on ldCT and also in the thoracic spine. However, almost half of all bone formation occurred in corners without VCI or VCFD, suggesting the presence of these lesions in yearly MRIs does not fully clarify the development of syndesmophytes. Show less
Heijde, D. van der; Deodhar, A.; Maksymowych, W.P.; Sieper, J.; Bosch, F. van den; Kim, T.H.; ... ; Song, I.H. 2022
Introduction Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has not been previously reported. Methods In SELECT-AXIS 1, patients receiving placebo... Show moreIntroduction Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has not been previously reported. Methods In SELECT-AXIS 1, patients receiving placebo were switched to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily at week 14 while patients initially randomised to upadacitinib continued their regimen through week 104. Efficacy was assessed using as-observed (AO) and non-responder imputation (NRI). Results Of 187 patients randomised, 144 patients (77%) completed week 104. Among patients receiving continuous upadacitinib, 85.9% (AO) and 65.6% (NRI) achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 response (ASAS40) at week 104. Similar magnitude of ASAS40 responses were observed among patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib (88.7% and 63.8%, respectively). The mean change from baseline to week 104 in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI spine and sacroiliac joint inflammation scores were -7.3 and -5.3, respectively, in the continuous upadacitinib group and -7.9 and -4.9 in the placebo-to-upadacitinib switch group. The mean (95% CI) change from baseline to week 104 in the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score was 0.7 (0.3, 1.1) in the total group. Adverse event rate was 242.7/100 patient-years. No serious infections, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, lymphoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, or gastrointestinal perforations were observed. Conclusions Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily showed sustained and consistent efficacy over 2 years for ASAS40 and other clinically relevant endpoints. A low rate of radiographic progression was observed and no new safety findings were observed. Show less
