Background and Objectives: In SSc, ILD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to investigate the performance of DLCO (diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide) and FVC (forced... Show moreBackground and Objectives: In SSc, ILD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to investigate the performance of DLCO (diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide) and FVC (forced vital capacity) delta change (Delta) and baseline values in predicting the development of SSc-ILD. Methods: Longitudinal data of DLCO, FVC, and ILD on the HRCT of SSc patients from the EUSTAR database were evaluated at baseline (t0) and after 12 (+/- 4) (t1) and 24 (+/- 4) (t(2)) months. Results: 474/17805 patients were eligible for the study (403 females); 46 (9.7%) developed ILD at t(2). Positivity for anti-topoisomerase antibodies (117 patients) showed an association with ILD development at t(2) (p = 0.0031). Neither the mean t0 to t1 change (Delta) of DLCO nor the mean t(0) to t(1) FVC Delta predicted the appearance of ILD at t(2). Investigating the possible role of baseline DLCO and FVC values in predicting ILD appearance after 24 (+/- 4) months, we observed a moderate predictive capability of t(0) DLCO < 80%, stronger than that of FVC < 80%. Conclusions: We suggest that an impaired baseline DLCO may be predictive of the appearance of ILD after 2 years of follow-up. This result advances the hypothesis that a reduction in gas exchange may be considered an early sign of lung involvement. However, further rigorous studies are warranted to understand the predictive role of DLCO evaluation in the course of SSc. Show less
ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate the association between the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ratio and estimated glomerular... Show moreObjectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate the association between the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and their association with mortality in the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) cohort.MethodsPatients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) from the EUSTAR database with TAPSE, sPAP, and parameters required to calculate eGFR were included. Logistic regression and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate TAPSE/sPAP as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and overall survival.ResultsA total of 2,370 patients with SSc were included; 284 (12%) patients had CKD stage 3a–5. TAPSE/sPAP (odds ratio [OR] 0.479; 95% CI 0.310–0.743; P < 0.001), arterial hypertension (OR 3.118; 95% CI 2.173–4.475; P < 0.001), diastolic dysfunction (OR 1.670; 95% CI 1.148–2.428; P < 0.01), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (OR 1.165; 95% CI 1.041–1.304; P < 0.01) were associated with CKD stage 3a–5. TAPSE/sPAP ≤0.32 mm/mm Hg (hazard ratio [HR] 3.589; 95% CI 2.236–5.761; P < 0.001), eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (HR 2.818; 95% CI 1.777–4.468; P < 0.001), and age (HR 1.782; 95% CI 1.348–2.356; P < 0.001) were the most significant predictive factors for all-cause mortality. A total of 276 patients with SSc had pulmonary hypertension (PH) confirmed by right heart catheterization, with 69 (25%) having CKD stage 3a–5. No difference was found in eGFR between patients with PH with reduced or normal cardiac index.ConclusionReduced TAPSE/sPAP ratio is independently associated with CKD. TAPSE/sPAP ratio ≤0.32 mm/mm Hg and eGFR <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 are prognostic factors for all-cause mortality. In patients with SSc with PH, eGFR is independent by reduced cardiac output. Show less
Background: Postgraduate rheumatology training programmes are already established at a national level in most European countries. However, previous work has highlighted a substantial level of... Show moreBackground: Postgraduate rheumatology training programmes are already established at a national level in most European countries. However, previous work has highlighted a substantial level of heterogeneity in the organisation and, in part, content of programmes. Objective: To define competences and standards of knowledge, skills and professional behaviours required for the training of rheumatologists. Methods: A European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force (TF) of 23 experts, including two members of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) section of rheumatology, was convened. The mapping phase consisted of the retrieval of key documents on specialty training in rheumatology and other related specialties across a broad set of international sources. The content of these documents was extracted and represented the foundation for the document draft that underwent several rounds of online discussion within the TF, and afterwards was also distributed to a broad group of stakeholders for collecting feedback. The list of generated competences was voted on during the TF meetings, while the level of agreement (LoA) with each statement was established by anonymous online voting. Results: A total of 132 international training curricula were retrieved and extracted. In addition to the TF members, 253 stakeholders commented and voted on the competences through an online anonymous survey. The TF developed (1) an overarching framework indicating the areas that should be addressed during training, (2) 7 domains defining broad areas that rheumatology trainees should master by the end of the training programme, (3) 8 core themes defining the nuances of each domain and (4) 28 competences that trainees should acquire to cover each of the areas outlined in the overarching framework. A high LoA was achieved for all competences. Conclusion: These points to consider for EULAR-UEMS standards for the training of European rheumatologists are now defined. Their dissemination and use can hopefully contribute to harmonising training across European countries. Show less
Background Postgraduate rheumatology training programmes are already established at a national level in most European countries. However, previous work has highlighted a substantial level of... Show moreBackground Postgraduate rheumatology training programmes are already established at a national level in most European countries. However, previous work has highlighted a substantial level of heterogeneity in the organisation and, in part, content of programmes.Objective To define competences and standards of knowledge, skills and professional behaviours required for the training of rheumatologists.Methods A European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force (TF) of 23 experts, including two members of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) section of rheumatology, was convened. The mapping phase consisted of the retrieval of key documents on specialty training in rheumatology and other related specialties across a broad set of international sources. The content of these documents was extracted and represented the foundation for the document draft that underwent several rounds of online discussion within the TF, and afterwards was also distributed to a broad group of stakeholders for collecting feedback. The list of generated competences was voted on during the TF meetings, while the level of agreement (LoA) with each statement was established by anonymous online voting.Results A total of 132 international training curricula were retrieved and extracted. In addition to the TF members, 253 stakeholders commented and voted on the competences through an online anonymous survey. The TF developed (1) an overarching framework indicating the areas that should be addressed during training, (2) 7 domains defining broad areas that rheumatology trainees should master by the end of the training programme, (3) 8 core themes defining the nuances of each domain and (4) 28 competences that trainees should acquire to cover each of the areas outlined in the overarching framework. A high LoA was achieved for all competences.Conclusion These points to consider for EULAR–UEMS standards for the training of European rheumatologists are now defined. Their dissemination and use can hopefully contribute to harmonising training across European countries. Show less
Elhai, M.; Sritharan, N.; Boubaya, M.; Balbir-Gurman, A.; Siegert, E.; Hachulla, E.; ... ; USTAR Collaborators 2022
Background The current subclassification of systemic sclerosis into cutaneous subtypes does not fully capture the heterogeneity of the disease. We aimed to compare the performances of... Show moreBackground The current subclassification of systemic sclerosis into cutaneous subtypes does not fully capture the heterogeneity of the disease. We aimed to compare the performances of stratification into LeRoy's cutaneous subtypes versus stratification by autoantibody status in systemic sclerosis. Methods For this cohort study, we assessed people with systemic sclerosis in the multicentre international European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Individuals positive for systemic-sclerosis autoantibodies of two specificities were excluded, and remaining individuals were classified by cutaneous subtype, according to their systemic sclerosis-specific autoantibodies, or both. We assessed the performance of each model to predict overall survival, progression-free survival, disease progression, and different organ involvement. The three models were compared by use of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and the net reclassification improvement (NRI). Missing data were imputed. Findings We assessed the database on July 26, 2019. Of 16 939 patients assessed for eligibility, 10 711 patients were included: 1647 (15middot4%) of 10 709 were male, 9062 (84middot6%) were female, mean age was 54middot4 (SD 13middot8) years, and mean disease duration was 7middot9 (SD 8middot2) years. Information regarding cutaneous subtype was available for 10 176 participants and antibody data were available for 9643 participants. In the prognostic analysis, there was no difference in AUC for overall survival (0middot82, 95% CI 0middot81-0middot84 for cutaneous only vs 0middot84, 0middot82-0middot85 for antibody only vs 0middot84, 0middot83-0middot86 for combined) or for progression-free survival (0middot70, 0middot69-0middot71 vs 0middot71, 0middot70-0middot72 vs 0middot71, 0middot70-0middot72). However, at 4 years the NRI showed substantial improvement for the antibody-only model compared with the cutaneous-only model in prediction of overall survival (0middot57, 0middot46-0middot71 for antibody only vs 0middot29, 0middot19-0middot39 for cutaneous only) and disease progression (0middot36, 0middot29-0middot46 vs 0middot21, 0middot14-0middot28). The antibody -only model did better than the cutaneous-only model in predicting renal crisis (AUC 0middot72, 0middot70-0middot74 for antibody only vs 0middot66, 0middot64-0middot69 for cutaneous only) and lung fibrosis leading to restrictive lung function (AUC 0middot76, 0middot75-0middot77 vs 0middot71, 0middot70-0middot72). The combined model improved the prediction of digital ulcers and elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure, but did poorly for cardiac involvement. Interpretation The autoantibody-only model outperforms cutaneous-only subsetting for risk stratifying people with systemic sclerosis in the EUSTAR cohort. Physicians should be aware of these findings at the time of decision making for patient management. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Objectives The prevalence and characteristics of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) vary between geographical regions worldwide. The objectives of this study were to explore the... Show moreObjectives The prevalence and characteristics of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) vary between geographical regions worldwide. The objectives of this study were to explore the differences in terms of prevalence, phenotype, treatment and prognosis in patients with SSc-ILD from predetermined geographical regions in the EUSTAR database. Material and methods Patients were clustered into seven geographical regions. Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with SSc-ILD were compared among these pre-determined regions. Results For baseline analyses, 9260 SSc patients were included, with 6732 for survival analyses. The prevalence of SSc-ILD in the overall population was 50.2%, ranging from 44.0% in 'Western Europe and Nordic countries' to 67.5% in 'Eastern European, Russia and Baltic countries'. In all regions, anti-topoisomerase antibodies were associated with SSc-ILD. Management also significantly differed; mycophenolate mofetil was prescribed at baseline in 31.6% of patients with SSc-ILD in 'America (North and South)' and 31.7% in 'Middle East' but only 4.3% in 'Asia and Oceania' (P <0.0001). Patients from 'America (North and South)' and 'Middle East' had the highest survival rate at the end of follow-up (85.8% and 85.2%, respectively). Conclusions Our study highlights key differences among regions in terms of clinical presentation and prognosis of SSc-ILD. This work also demonstrates that the management of SSc-ILD is highly variable among the different regions considered, suggesting that efforts are still needed for the standardization of medical practice in the treatment of this disease. Show less
In order to address the main challenges related to the rare diseases (RDs) the European Commission launched the European Reference Networks (ERNs), virtual networks involving healthcare providers ... Show moreIn order to address the main challenges related to the rare diseases (RDs) the European Commission launched the European Reference Networks (ERNs), virtual networks involving healthcare providers (HCPs) across Europe. The mission of the ERNs is to tackle low prevalence and RDs that require highly specialised treatment and a concentration of knowledge and resources. In fact, ERNs offer the potential to give patients and healthcare professionals across the EU access to the best expertise and timely exchange of lifesaving knowledge, trying to make the knowledge travelling more than patients. For this reason, ERNs were established as concrete European infrastructures, and this is particularly crucial in the framework of rare and complex diseases in which no country alone has the whole knowledge and capacity to treat all types of patients.It has been five years since their kick-off launch in Vilnius in 2017. The 24 ERNs have been intensively working on different transversal areas, including patient management, education, clinical practice guidelines, patients' care pathways and many other fundamental topics. The present work is therefore aimed not only at reporting a summary of the main activities and milestones reached so far, but also at celebrating the first 5 years of the ERN on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculo-skeletal Diseases (ReCONNET), in which the members of the network built together one of the 24 infrastructures that are hopefully going to change the scenario of rare diseases across the EU. Show less
Objective: Contagious disease outbreaks and related restrictions can lead to negative psychological outcomes, particularly in vulnerable populations at risk due to pre-existing medical conditions.... Show moreObjective: Contagious disease outbreaks and related restrictions can lead to negative psychological outcomes, particularly in vulnerable populations at risk due to pre-existing medical conditions. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have tested interventions to reduce mental health consequences of contagious disease outbreaks. The primary objective of the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network COVID-19 Home-isolation Activities Together (SPIN-CHAT) Trial is to evaluate the effect of a videoconference-based program on symptoms of anxiety. Secondary objectives include evaluating effects on symptoms of depression, stress, loneliness, boredom, physical activity, and social interaction.Methods: The SPIN-CHAT Trial is a pragmatic RCT that will be conducted using the SPIN-COVID-19 Cohort, a sub-cohort of the SPIN Cohort. Eligible participants will be SPIN-COVID-19 Cohort participants without a positive COVID-19 test, with at least mild anxiety (PROMIS Anxiety 4a v1.0 T-score >= 55), not working from home, and not receiving current counselling or psychotherapy. We will randomly assign 162 participants to intervention groups of 7 to 10 participants each or waitlist control. We will use a partially nested RCT design to reflect dependence between individuals in training groups but not in the waitlist control. The SPIN-CHAT Program includes activity engagement, education on strategies to support mental health, and mutual participant support. Intervention participants will receive the 4-week (3 sessions per week) SPIN-CHAT Program via video-conference. The primary outcome is PROMIS Anxiety 4a score immediately post-intervention.Ethics and dissemination: The SPIN-CHAT Trial will test whether a brief videoconference-based intervention will improve mental health outcomes among at-risk individuals during contagious disease outbreak. Show less
