Objective: To compare effects of immediate delivery vs expectant monitoring on neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 5 years of age in offspring of women with mild late preterm hypertensive... Show moreObjective: To compare effects of immediate delivery vs expectant monitoring on neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes at 5 years of age in offspring of women with mild late preterm hypertensive disorders.Study design: We studied children born during the HYPITAT-11 trial, in which 704 women with a hypertensive disorder between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation were randomized to immediate delivery or expectant monitoring. Participating women were asked to complete the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) for developmental outcome and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) for behavioral problems when their child was 5 years old. Outcomes were dichotomized and analyzed by logistic regression analysis. We also assessed factors influencing development and behavior at both 2 and 5 years after a hypertensive pregnancy.Results: Five years after the original study 322(46%) women were contacted for follow-up, of whom 148 (46%) responded. In the delivery group 22%(n = 14/65) of the children had an abnormal ASQ score compared to 21% (n = 13/62) in the expectant monitoring group (p = 0.9). Abnormal CBCL-scores were found in 19% (n = 14/72) of the children in the delivery group versus in 27% (n = 20/75) in the expectant monitoring group (p = 0.3). The main predictor of development and behavior at 2 and 5 years was fetal growth restriction (for abnormal development OR 2.1, CI 1.0-4.4; for behavior problems OR 2.2, CI 1.1-5.5). Higher maternal education decreased abnormal behavior outcomes (OR 0.5, CI 0.2-0.9) and a similar tendency was observed for developmental problems (OR 0.6, CI 0.3 - 1.1).Conclusion: We did not find different developmental and behavior outcomes at 5 years of age between a management policy of immediate delivery and expectant management in preterm hypertensive disorders. The increased risk of developmental delay at 2 years of age after immediate delivery, we found in the 2 year follow up study, did not persist at 5 years of age. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Show less
OBJECTIVESTo investigate the effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in the third trimester in reducing adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancies compared with usual care and the effect... Show moreOBJECTIVESTo investigate the effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in the third trimester in reducing adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancies compared with usual care and the effect of this policy on maternal outcomes and obstetric interventions.DESIGNPragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.SETTING60 midwifery practices in the Netherlands.PARTICIPANTS13 046 women aged 16 years or older with a low risk singleton pregnancy.INTERVENTIONS60 midwifery practices offered usual care (serial fundal height measurements with clinically indicated ultrasonography). After 3, 7, and 10 months, a third of the practices were randomised to the intervention strategy. As well as receiving usual care, women in the intervention strategy were offered two routine biometry scans at 28-30 and 34-36 weeks' gestation. The same multidisciplinary protocol for detecting and managing fetal growth restriction was used in both strategies.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome measure was a composite of severe adverse perinatal outcomes: perinatal death, Apgar score <4, impaired consciousness, asphyxia, seizures, assisted ventilation, septicaemia, meningitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leucomalacia, or necrotising enterocolitis. Secondary outcomes were two composite measures of severe maternal morbidity, and spontaneous labour and birth.RESULTSBetween 1 February 2015 and 29 February 2016, 60 midwifery practices enrolled 13 520 women in mid-pregnancy (mean 22.8 (SD 2.4) weeks' gestation). 13 046 women (intervention n=7067, usual care n=5979) with data based on the national Dutch perinatal registry or hospital records were included in the analyses. Small for gestational age at birth was significantly more often detected in the intervention group than in the usual care group (179 of 556 (32%) v 78 of 407 (19%), P<0.001). The incidence of severe adverse perinatal outcomes was 1.7% (n=118) for the intervention strategy and 1.8% (n=106) for usual care. After adjustment for confounders, the difference between the groups was not significant (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.20). The intervention strategy showed a higher incidence of induction of labour (1.16, 1.04 to 1.30) and a lower incidence of augmentation of labour (0.78, 0.71 to 0.85). Maternal outcomes and other obstetric interventions did not differ between the strategies.CONCLUSIONIn low risk pregnancies, routine ultrasonography in the third trimester along with clinically indicated ultrasonography was associated with higher antenatal detection of small for gestational age fetuses but not with a reduced incidence of severe adverse perinatal outcomes compared with usual care alone. The findings do not support routine ultrasonography Show less
