Previous angiographic studies have shown that almost two-thirds of vulnerable plaques are located in non-obstructive lesions. Possibly, the maximum necrotic core (Max NC) area is not always... Show morePrevious angiographic studies have shown that almost two-thirds of vulnerable plaques are located in non-obstructive lesions. Possibly, the maximum necrotic core (Max NC) area is not always identical to the site of most severe stenosis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential difference in location between the maximum necrotic core area and the site of most severe narrowing as assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH IVUS). Overall, 77 patients (139 vessels) underwent VH IVUS. The Max NC site was defined as the cross section with the largest necrotic core area per vessel. The site of most severe narrowing was defined as the minimum lumen area (MLA). Per vessel, the distance from both the Max NC site and MLA site to the origo of the coronary artery was evaluated. In addition, the presence of a virtual histology-thin cap fibroatheroma (VH-TCFA) was assessed. The mean difference (mm) between the MLA site and Max NC site was 10.8 ± 20.6 mm (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the Max NC site was located at the MLA site in seven vessels (5%) and proximally to the MLA site in 92 vessels (66%). Importantly, a higher percentage of VH-TCFA was demonstrated at the Max NC site as compared to the MLA site (24 vs. 9%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the present findings demonstrate that the Max NC area is rarely at the site of most severe narrowing. Most often, the Max NC area is located proximal to the site of most severe narrowing. Show less
Velzen, J.E. van; Graaf, M.A. de; Ciarka, A.; Graaf, F.R. de; Schalij, M.J.; Kroft, L.J.; ... ; Wall, E.E. van der 2012
Multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides information on plaque extent and stenosis in the coronary wall. More accurate lesion assessment may be feasible with CTA as compared to... Show moreMultidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides information on plaque extent and stenosis in the coronary wall. More accurate lesion assessment may be feasible with CTA as compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Accordingly, lesion length assessment was compared between ICA and CTA in patients referred for CTA who underwent subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 89 patients clinically referred for CTA were subsequently referred for ICA and PCI. On CTA, lesion length was measured from the proximal to the distal shoulder of the plaque. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed to analyze lesion length. Stent length was recorded for each lesion. In total, 119 lesions were retrospectively identified. Mean lesion length on CTA was 21.4 ± 8.4 mm and on QCA 12.6 ± 6.1 mm. Mean stent length deployed was 17.4 ± 5.3 mm. Lesion length on CTA was significantly longer than on QCA (difference 8.8 ± 6.7 mm, P < 0.001). Moreover, lesion length visualized on CTA was also significantly longer than mean stent length (CTA lesion length-stent length was 4.2 ± 8.7 mm, P < 0.001). Lesion length assessed by CTA is longer than that assessed by ICA. Possibly, CTA provides more accurate lesion length assessment than ICA and may facilitate improved guidance of percutaneous treatment of coronary lesions. Show less
Graaf, M.A. de; Jager, K.J.; Zoccali, C.; Dekker, F.W. 2011
