Aims: For >300 drugs, sexual side effects are included in the drug information leaflet. As sexual adverse events (sAEs) may be more easily shared at online medication platforms, patient-reported... Show moreAims: For >300 drugs, sexual side effects are included in the drug information leaflet. As sexual adverse events (sAEs) may be more easily shared at online medication platforms, patient-reported drug experiences may add to the current knowledge on sAE experiences. This study evaluated patient reports from the online platform mijnmedicijn.nl for the frequency of sAE reporting, sex differences concerning sAEs and to assess drugs with disproportional sAE reporting. Methods: On the online platform, terms for sAEs as used by patients were collected with a poll. Subsequently, drug reports posted between 2008 and 2020 were searched for sAEs with the identified terms. From the retrieved reports, the sAE frequencies and complaints and reporting odds ratios (ROR) were calculated, stratified for sex and drug (class). sAE reporting was considered disproportional frequent if the lower 95% confidence interval bound of the ROR >2.0. Results: For 189 drugs, sAEs were identified in 2408 reports (3.9%). Women posted 1383 reports (3.5% of all female reports) and men 1025 (4.7%). Almost half of the sAE reports addressed antidepressants: 586 reports of women (ROR 4.2; 95%CI 3.8-4.7) and 510 reports of men (ROR 7.5; 95%CI 6.6-8.5). Disproportional high numbers of sAE reports were found for 27 drugs, mostly antidepressants, hormonal contraceptives and drugs used in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Of these drugs with frequent sAEs, 7 had low sAE risks in their professional drug information. Conclusion: One in 25 drug reports on mijnmedicijn.nl included sAEs. The sAEs were reported frequently for antidepressants, contraceptives and drugs used in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Show less
Background Anti-cancer drugs commonly adversely affect fertility and sexual function. Despite this, patients report a lack of counselling of these potential adverse effects. The aim was to... Show moreBackground Anti-cancer drugs commonly adversely affect fertility and sexual function. Despite this, patients report a lack of counselling of these potential adverse effects. The aim was to determine Dutch oncologists' knowledge about the adverse effects of various cancer drugs on fertility and sexual function. Methods A cross-sectional survey was sent to members of the Dutch Society for Medical Oncology (n = 433). The survey questions included various cancer drugs' adverse effects on fertility, ovulation, spermatogenesis, and sexual function. Results One hundred and five of 392 oncologists responded (26.8%). Oncologists were more aware of the adverse effects on fertility compared to sexual function. Drugs that were mostly believed to negatively affect fertility were cisplatin (n = 81, 80.2%), epirubicin (n = 78, 78.0%) and cyclophosphamide (n = 80, 77.7%). Regarding sexual function, most mentioned drugs were tamoxifen (n = 67, 65.7%), GnRH-agonists (n = 64, 63.4%) and cisplatin (n = 58, 57.4%). Oncologists with expertise in urology possessed more awareness regarding sexuality-related adverse effects (cisplatin p = 0.038, etoposide p = 0.025, ifosfamide p = 0.06, vinblastine p = 0.000). Conclusion Results revealed that oncologists have different beliefs about possible sexual and fertility-related adverse effects concerning medication resources and literature. Based on our results, oncologists do not possess sufficient knowledge to inform patients about sexual and fertility-related adverse effects. Show less
Introduction: Nonprescription sildenafil was introduced to the United Kingdom in 2018 as the first pharmacy service concerning sexual function, an important but often ignored factor for quality of... Show moreIntroduction: Nonprescription sildenafil was introduced to the United Kingdom in 2018 as the first pharmacy service concerning sexual function, an important but often ignored factor for quality of life.Aim: This study aimed to evaluate pharmacists' views on providing nonprescription sildenafil, their perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to provide this service and strategies to overcome potential barriers, using a theory-based approach.Methods: Community pharmacists were purposefully sampled in Northern Ireland, followed by snowball sampling. Face-to-face interviews were conducted between October 2019 and January 2020. The semi-structured interviews used a piloted topic guide based on the 14-domain Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymized. Transcripts were analyzed deductively in NVivo 13, utilizing the TDF domains as coding categories. Within each domain, content analysis was utilized to identify barriers and facilitators.Main Outcome Measure: Barriers and facilitators within the TDF domains for pharmacists to provide nonprescription sildenafil.Results: Ten pharmacists were interviewed to reach data saturation. Eight pharmacists had experience with dispensing nonprescription sildenafil. They valued nonprescription sildenafil as an additional service ("Social/professional role and identity"). Training, concise product guidelines, and private consultation areas were important facilitators ("Environmental context and resources"). The service required trusting clients ("Optimism"), with concerns about abuse and men not visiting their GP. From experience gained, pharmacists became more confident dealing with difficult situations such as patients being vague about their medical history or alcoholism or mental problems as causes for erectile disfunction (ED) ("Skills" and "Beliefs about capabilities"). Pharmacists considered lifestyle and medication causes of ED important but preferred to focus on safe supply. In general, pharmacists were satisfied with the perceived professional recognition, using their clinical knowledge or helping patients resume sexual relationships ("Beliefs about consequences").Conclusion: Pharmacists welcomed nonprescription sildenafil to enhance their role as easily accessible healthcare providers for patients. Copyright (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. Show less
Background and Objectives: Adverse drug reactions on sexual functioning (sADRs) may seriously decrease a person's quality of life. A multitude of diseases and drugs are known risk factors for... Show moreBackground and Objectives: Adverse drug reactions on sexual functioning (sADRs) may seriously decrease a person's quality of life. A multitude of diseases and drugs are known risk factors for sexual dysfunction.To inform patients better about these potential effects, more insight is needed on the estimated number of patients at high risk for sADRs and their characteristics.Methods: This cross-sectional study estimated the number of patients in the Netherlands who were dispensed drugs with a potential very high risk (>10%) or high risk (1-10%) for sADRs as registered in the Summary of Product Characteristics, the official drug information text in Europe.Results: In April 2019, 2.06% of the inhabitants of the Netherlands received drugs with >10% risk for sADRs and 7.76% with 1-10% risk.The majority of these patients had at least one additional risk factor for decreased sexual function such as high age or depression. Almost half of the patients were identified with two or more morbidities influencing sexual functioning. Paroxetine, sertraline and spironolactone were the most dispensed drugs with a potential >10% risk for sADRs. One-third of their first dispenses were not followed by a second dispense, with a higher risk of discontinuation for a decreasing number of morbidities.Conclusion: About 1 in 11 inhabitants of the Netherlands was dispensed a drug with a potential high risk for sADRs, often with other risk factors for sexual complaints. Further research is needed whether these users actually experience sADRs, to understand its impact on multimorbid patients and to provide alternatives if needed. Show less
