Defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) causes elevated tumour mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in multiple cancer types. dMMR/MSI colorectal cancers (CRCs) have enhanced T... Show moreDefective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) causes elevated tumour mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in multiple cancer types. dMMR/MSI colorectal cancers (CRCs) have enhanced T-cell infiltrate and favourable outcome; however, this association has not been reliably detected in other tumour types, including endometrial cancer (EC). We sought to confirm this and explore the underpinning mechanisms. We first meta-analysed CRC and EC trials that have examined the prognostic value of dMMR/MSI and confirmed that dMMR/MSI predicts better prognosis in CRC, but not EC, with statistically significant variation between cancers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54-0.73 versus HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.72-1.58; P-INT = 0.02). Next, we studied intratumoural immune infiltrate in CRCs and ECs of defined MMR status and found that while dMMR was associated with increased density of tumour-infiltrating CD3(+) and CD8(+) T-cells in both cancer types, the increases were substantially greater in CRC and significant only in this group (P-INT = 4.3e-04 and 7.3e-03, respectively). Analysis of CRC and EC from the independent Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) series revealed similar variation and significant interactions in proportions of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8(+), CD4(+), NK cells and immune checkpoint expression, confirming a more vigorous immune response to dMMR/MSI in CRC than EC. Agnostic analysis identified the IFN gamma pathway activity as strongly upregulated by dMMR/MSI in CRC, but downregulated in EC by frequent JAK1 mutations, the impact of which on IFN gamma response was confirmed by functional analyses. Collectively, our results confirm the discordant prognosis of dMMR/MSI in CRC and EC and suggest that this relates to differences in intratumoural immune infiltrate and tumour genome. Our study underscores the need for tissue-specific analysis of cancer biomarkers and may help inform immunotherapy use. (c) 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Show less
Ryan, N.A.J.; Walker, T.D.J.; Bolton, J.; Haar, N. ter; Wezel, T. van; Glaire, M.A.; ... ; Crosbie, E.J. 2021
Simple Summary Endometrial cancers can arise due to an error in DNA mending known as mismatch repair. This can happen because of an error in the cancer itself (somatic) or due to an inherited error... Show moreSimple Summary Endometrial cancers can arise due to an error in DNA mending known as mismatch repair. This can happen because of an error in the cancer itself (somatic) or due to an inherited error (Lynch syndrome). Treatment trials have considered endometrial cancers caused by either of these errors as identical. As it is easier to recruit people with Lynch syndrome, they may be overrepresented in this group despite being less numerous in clinical practice. This would not be an issue if somatic and Lynch syndrome-related endometrial cancers were similar at a molecular level. The data presented herein, however, indicates that these two routes to mismatch repair, although sharing many similarities, lead to endometrial cancers with distinct molecular and pathological features. This may explain the range of outcomes observed in clinical trials of endometrial cancers with mismatch repair errors. Background: Mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) tumours may arise from somatic events acquired during carcinogenesis or in the context of Lynch syndrome (LS), an inherited cancer predisposition condition caused by germline MMR pathogenic variants. Our aim was to explore whether sporadic and hereditary MMRd endometrial cancers (EC) display distinctive tumour biology. Methods: Clinically annotated LS-EC were collected. Histological slide review was performed centrally by two specialist gynaecological pathologists. Mutational analysis was by a bespoke 75- gene next-generation sequencing panel. Comparisons were made with sporadic MMRd EC. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to explore similarities and differences between the cohorts. Results: After exclusions, 135 LS-EC underwent independent histological review, and 64 underwent mutational analysis. Comparisons were made with 59 sporadic MMRd EC. Most tumours were of endometrioid histological subtype (92% LS-EC and 100% sporadic MMRd EC, respectively, p = NS). Sporadic MMRd tumours had significantly fewer tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (p <= 0.0001) and showed more squamous/mucinous differentiation than LS-EC (p = 0.04/p = 0.05). PTEN mutations were found in 88% sporadic MMRd and 61% LS-EC, respectively (p < 0.001). Sporadic MMRd tumours had significantly more mutations in PDGFRA, ALK, IDH1, CARD11, CIC, MED12, CCND1, PTPN11, RB1 and KRAS, while LS-EC showed more mutations affecting SMAD4 and ARAF. LS-EC showed a propensity for TGF-beta signalling disruption. Cluster analysis found that wild type PTEN associates predominantly with LS-EC, whilst co-occurring mutations in PTEN, PIK3CA and KRAS predict sporadic MMRd EC. Conclusions: Whilst MMRd EC of hereditary and sporadic aetiology may be difficult to distinguish by histology alone, differences in infiltrating immune cell counts and mutational profile may predict heterogenous responses to novel targeted therapies and warrant further study. Show less
Jonge, M.M. de; Auguste, A.; Wijk, L.M. van; Schouten, P.C.; Meijers, M.; Haar, N.T. ter; ... ; Bosse, T. 2019
