BackgroundSocial relationships are crucial for well-being and health, and considerable research has established social stressors as a risk for well-being and health. However, researchers have used... Show moreBackgroundSocial relationships are crucial for well-being and health, and considerable research has established social stressors as a risk for well-being and health. However, researchers have used many different constructs, and it is unclear if these are actually different or reflect a single overarching construct. Distinct patterns of associations with health/well-being would indicate separate constructs, similar patterns would indicate a common core construct, and remaining differences could be attributed to situational characteristics such as frequency or intensity. The current meta-analysis therefore investigated to what extent different social stressors show distinct (versus similar) patterns of associations with well-being and health.MethodsWe meta-analysed 557 studies and investigated correlations between social stressors and outcomes in terms of health and well-being (e.g. burnout), attitudes (e.g. job satisfaction), and behaviour (e.g. counterproductive work behaviour). Moderator analyses were performed to determine if there were differences in associations depending on the nature of the stressor, the outcome, or both. To be included, studies had to be published in peer-reviewed journals in English or German; participants had to be employed at least 50% of a full-time equivalent (FTE).ResultsThe overall relation between social stressors and health/well-being was of medium size (r = −.30, p < .001). Type of social stressor and outcome category acted as moderators, with moderating effects being larger for outcomes than for stressors. The strongest effects emerged for job satisfaction, burnout, commitment, and counterproductive work behaviour. Type of stressor yielded a significant moderation, but differences in effect sizes for different stressors were rather small overall. Rather small effects were obtained for physical violence and sexual mistreatment, which is likely due to a restricted range because of rare occurrence and/or underreporting of such intense stressors.ConclusionsWe propose integrating diverse social stressor constructs under the term “relational devaluation” and considering situational factors such as intensity or frequency to account for the remaining variance. Practical implications underscore the importance for supervisors to recognize relational devaluation in its many different forms and to avoid or minimize it as far as possible in order to prevent negative health-related outcomes for employees. Show less
Outcome of 333 children with acute myeloid leukaemia relapsing after a first allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation was analyzed. Four-year probability of overall survival (4y-pOS) was... Show moreOutcome of 333 children with acute myeloid leukaemia relapsing after a first allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation was analyzed. Four-year probability of overall survival (4y-pOS) was 14%. 4y-pOS for 122 children receiving a second haematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 31% and 3% for those that did not (P = <0 center dot 0001). Achievement of a subsequent remission impacted survival (P = <0 center dot 0001). For patients receiving a second transplant survival with or without achieving a subsequent remission was comparable. Graft source (bone marrow vs. peripheral blood stem cells, P = 0 center dot 046) and donor choice (matched family vs. matched unrelated donor, P = 0 center dot 029) positively impacted survival after relapse. Disease recurrence and non-relapse mortality at four years reached 45% and 22%. Show less
Background: Ingestion of high doses of casein hydrolysate stimulates insulin secretion in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes. The effects of low doses have not been studied. The aim... Show moreBackground: Ingestion of high doses of casein hydrolysate stimulates insulin secretion in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes. The effects of low doses have not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of lower doses of a casein hydrolysate on the glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose tolerance test in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, thirteen patients with type 2 diabetes (age: 58 +/- 1 years) were studied. Glucose, insulin and C-peptide responses were determined after the oral administration of 0 (control), 6 or 12 g protein hydrolysate in combination with 50 g carbohydrate. Results: Twelve grams of casein hydrolysate, but not 6 g, elevated insulin levels and decreased glucose levels post-challenge. These changes over time were not large enough to also affect the total area under the curve of glucose and insulin. C-peptide levels did not change after both treatments. Conclusion: Ingestion of six grams of casein hydrolysate did not affect glucose or insulin responses. Intake of 12 g of casein hydrolysate has a small positive effect on post-challenge insulin and glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. (C) 2011 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Show less
