Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of the infliximab biosimilar (sim-INF) CT-P13 with originator infliximab (orig-INF) over 24 months of follow-up in biological-naïve patients with rheumatoid... Show moreObjectives: To compare the effectiveness of the infliximab biosimilar (sim-INF) CT-P13 with originator infliximab (orig-INF) over 24 months of follow-up in biological-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods: Biological-naïve patients from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt), with a clinical diagnosis of RA or axSpA, who were starting either the sim-INF CT-P13 or the orig-INF after 2014 (date of market entry of CT-P13 in Portugal), were included. Patients on biosimilar and originator were compared regarding different response outcomes at 3 and 6 months, adjusting for age, sex and baseline C Reactive Protein (CRP). The main outcome was the change in DAS28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) for RA and the ASDAS-CRP for axSpA. Additionally, the effect of sim-INF vs orig-INF on different response outcomes over 24 months of follow-up was tested with longitudinal generalized estimating equations (GEE) models. Results: In total, 140 patients were included, 66 (47%) of which with RA. The distribution of patients starting the sim-INF and the orig-INF was the same between the two diseases (approximately 60% and 40%, respectively). From the 66 patients with RA, 82% were females, mean age was 56 (SD 11) years and mean DAS28-ESR 4.9 (1.3) at baseline. As for the patients with axSpA, 53% were males, mean age was 46 (13.0) years and mean ASDAS-CRP 3.7 (0.9) at baseline. There were no differences in efficacy between RA patients treated with the sim-INF and the orig-INF, either at 3 months (∆DAS28-ESR: -0.6 (95% CI -1.3; 0.1) vs -1.2 (-2.0; -0.4)), or at 6 months (∆DAS28-ESR: -0.7 (-1.5; 0.0) vs -1.5 (-2.4; -0.7)). This was also true for patients with axSpA (∆ASDAS at 3 months: -1.6 (-2.0; -1.1) vs -1.4 (-1.8; -0.9) and at 6 months: -1.5 (-2.0; -1.1) vs -1.1 (-1.5; -0.7)). Results were similar with the longitudinal models over 24 months. Conclusion: There are no differences in effectiveness between the sim-INF CT-P13 and the orig-INF in the treatment of biological-naïve patients with active RA and axSpA in clinical practice. Show less
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disease, which affects the joints and is characterized by inflammation, cartilage loss and bone changes. Nowadays, there are no treatments for OA, and... Show moreOsteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disease, which affects the joints and is characterized by inflammation, cartilage loss and bone changes. Nowadays, there are no treatments for OA, and current therapies are focused on relieving the symptoms. As a new therapy approach, micro and nanoparticles have been extensively explored and among all the studied particles, the use of cell-membrane-based particles is expanding. Another promising approach studied to treat OA, is the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) which play an important role modulating inflammation. We developed a novel kind of MSCs' cytoplasmic-membrane-based nanoparticles, termed nano-ghosts (NGs).Retaining MSCs' surface properties and lacking cells' internal machinery allow the NGs to have immunomodulatory capacity and to be immune-evasive while not susceptible to host-induced changes.In this study, we demonstrate NGs' ability to target cartilage tissues, in vitro and in vivo, while modulating the inflammatory process. In vivo studies demonstrated NGs ability to act as an immunomodulatory drug slowing down cartilage degeneration process.Our proof-of-concept experiments show that NGs system is a versatile nano-carrier system, capable of therapeutics loading, with targeting capabilities towards healthy and inflamed cartilage cells.Our results, along with previously published data, clearly reveal the NGs system as a promising nano-carrier platform and as a potential immunomodulatory drug for several inflammation-related diseases. Show less
