BackgroundOver the past decades, opioid prescriptions have increased in the Netherlands. The Dutch general practitioners’ guideline on pain was recently updated and now aims to reduce opioid... Show moreBackgroundOver the past decades, opioid prescriptions have increased in the Netherlands. The Dutch general practitioners’ guideline on pain was recently updated and now aims to reduce opioid prescriptions and high-risk opioid use for non-cancer pain. The guideline, however, lacks practical measures for implementation.ObjectiveThis study aims to determine practical components for a tool that should assist Dutch primary care prescribers and implements the recently updated guideline to reduce opioid prescriptions and high-risk use.MethodsA modified Delphi approach was used. The practical components for the tool were identified based on systematic reviews, qualitative studies, and Dutch primary care guidelines. Suggested components were divided into Part A, containing components designed to reduce opioid initiation and stimulate short-term use, and Part B, containing components designed to reduce opioid use among patients on long-term opioid treatment. During three rounds, a multidisciplinary panel of 21 experts assessed the content, usability, and feasibility of these components by adding, deleting, and adapting components until consensus was reached on the outlines of an opioid reduction tool.ResultsThe resulting Part A consisted of six components, namely education, opioid decision tree, risk assessment, agreements on dosage and duration of use, guidance and follow-up, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The resulting Part B consisted of five components, namely education, patient identification, risk assessment, motivation, and tapering.ConclusionsIn this pragmatic Delphi study, components for an opioid reduction tool for Dutch primary care-givers are identified. These components need further development, and the final tool should be tested in an implementation study. Show less
BACKGROUND: We aimed to quantify the need for additional surgery in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) primarily treated with dexamethasone and to identify patient characteristics... Show moreBACKGROUND: We aimed to quantify the need for additional surgery in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) primarily treated with dexamethasone and to identify patient characteristics associated with additional surgery.METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from 283 patients with CSDH, primarily treated with dexamethasone, in 3 hospitals from 2008 to 2018. Primary outcome was the need for additional surgery. The association between baseline characteristics and additional surgery was analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis and presented as adjusted odds ratios (aOR).RESULTS: In total, 283 patients with CSDH were included: 146 patients (51.6%) received 1 dexamethasone course (DXM group), 30 patients (10.6%) received 2 dexamethasone courses (DXM-DXM group), and 107 patients (37.8%) received additional surgery (DXM-SURG group). Patients who underwent surgery more often had a Mark-walder Grading Scale of 2 (as compared with 1, aOR 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-4.65), used statins (aOR 2.09; 95% CI 1.01-4.33), had a larger midline shift (aOR 1.10 per mm; 95% CI 1.01-1.21) and had larger hematoma thickness (aOR 1.16 per mm; 95% CI 1.09-1.23), had a bilateral hematoma (aOR 1.85; 95% CI 0.90-3.79), and had a separated hematoma (as compared with homogeneous, aOR 1.77; 95% CI 0.72-4.38). Antithrombotics (aOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21-0.95) and trabecular hematoma (as compared with homogeneous, aOR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.77) were associated with a lower likelihood of surgery.CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of patients with CSDH primarily treated with dexamethasone received additional surgery. These patients were more severely affected amongst others with larger hematomas. Show less
