In this essay, I offer a novel interpretation of Rilke’s first elegy of Duino from the perspective of the homelessness of humanity. Starting with his distinction between angels, animals and humans,... Show moreIn this essay, I offer a novel interpretation of Rilke’s first elegy of Duino from the perspective of the homelessness of humanity. Starting with his distinction between angels, animals and humans, we discover that human life is characterized by the boundary situation between life and death, which renders us feeling homeless in the world. Today, God no longer functions as a stable point of reference, as the one who could alleviate this existential homelessness. Even though we are not always aware of our homelessness, our relationship with the world, characterized by an urge to control the variables of life, attests to it. The emptiness we experience must be fully acknowledged and lived through to determine whether an attitude of radical receptivity to life as a whole, encompassing both life and death, can help us find a home in the world. This human fate is challenging to bear, and perhaps finding a home will ultimately prove to be a futile endeavor. This raises the disquieting question: is being human worthwhile? In contrast to the timeless angelic universe, human life feels limited and inferior. Nevertheless, Rilke does not negate our lifeworld, but instead emphasizes the beauty of this singular existence, derived from the incredible fact that in this transitory life, the eternal shines. Show less
This paper examines the development of Nietzsche’s thought on pessimism in the light of his own reflections. Drawing on GT, the late prefaces he wrote around 1886 (GT, MA, M, FW), the fifth book of... Show moreThis paper examines the development of Nietzsche’s thought on pessimism in the light of his own reflections. Drawing on GT, the late prefaces he wrote around 1886 (GT, MA, M, FW), the fifth book of FW, and unpublished notes, it reconstructs the several meanings that Nietzsche attributes to ‘pessimism’. It focuses on the complex relation between ‘romantic’ and ‘Dionysian’ pessimism. It is shown that these two forms of pessimism are rooted in Nietzsche’s ambivalent metaphysical pessimism in GT, which is influenced by Schopenhauer and the tragic Greeks. This approach is distinguished from the later Nietzsche who attempts to redefine his struggle with pessimism in order to ‘forget’ the metaphysical background, and to understand pessimism as a symptom of historical and psychological conditions. Nietzsche consequently understands his own thought as a continuation of Schopenhauer’s critique of the Christian worldview, which leads to the problem of nihilism. Nietzsche attempts to show how it is possible to overcome romantic pessimism and European morality, if he also suffers the consequences of nihilism. In order to tackle this problem, Nietzsche formulates a dynamic of self-overcoming which needs both strength and weakness, health and sickness. Show less
