Objective: Personalized treatment depends on the treatment goals. Current prediction models to guide initial treatment choices focus on radiological damage progression. However, for some patients... Show moreObjective: Personalized treatment depends on the treatment goals. Current prediction models to guide initial treatment choices focus on radiological damage progression. However, for some patients this outcome is less relevant, whereas short-term functional ability is relevant to all. Do these various treatment goals share the same predictors? Methods: Data for 497 patients from the Dutch Behandel Strategieen (BeSt) study of treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), randomized to initial monotherapy or combination therapy, were used. Predictors of short-term functional disability [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score ≥ 1 after 3 months of treatment] were identified with logistic regression analyses. Predicted risks of a HAQ score ≥ 1 were determined for each treatment group and for each subpopulation. Results: At baseline, 76% of patients had a HAQ score ≥ 1 (mean 1.7 ± 0.5). After 3 months of treatment this score was achieved by 40% (mean HAQ score 1.5 ± 0.5). Baseline HAQ score, pain, the Ritchie Articular Index (RAI), and treatment group were significant independent predictors for a HAQ score ≥ 1; the presence of rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies, and baseline radiological damage were not. With cut-offs of 35% and 60%, the risk of a HAQ score ≥ 1 was high for 47% and low for 20% of the patients treated with initial monotherapy. Risks were markedly reduced in the combination therapy groups, also in unfavourable risk profiles. Conclusion: In recent-onset active RA, baseline HAQ score, pain, and initial treatment are predictors for a HAQ score ≥ 1 after 3 months. Known predictors of radiological damage were not predictive of short-term functional disability. The choice of the best initial treatment thus depends on the relevance of various outcome measures for an individual patient. Show less
Broek, M. van den; Dirven, L.; Klarenbeek, N.B.; Molenaar, T.H.E.; Han, K.H.; Kerstens, P.J.S.M.; ... ; Allaart, C.F. 2011
OBJECTIVE: Anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) are suggested to identify different subsets of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The authors compared the clinical and radiological... Show moreOBJECTIVE: Anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) are suggested to identify different subsets of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The authors compared the clinical and radiological responses to Disease Activity Score (DAS)-steered treatment in patients with RA positive or RA negative for ACPA.METHODS: In the BehandelStrategieën (BeSt) study, 508 patients with recent-onset RA were randomised to four treatment strategies aimed at a DAS ≤2.4. Risks of damage progression and (drug-free) remission in 8 years were compared for ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients using logistic regression analysis. Functional ability and DAS components over time were compared using linear mixed models.RESULTS: DAS reduction was achieved similarly in ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients in all treatment strategy groups, with a similar need to adjust treatment because of inadequate response. Functional ability and remission rates were not different for ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients. ACPA-positive patients had more radiological damage progression, especially after initial monotherapy. They had a lower chance of achieving (persistent) drug-free remission.CONCLUSION: Clinical response to treatment was similar in ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients. However, more ACPA-positive patients, especially those treated with initial monotherapy, had significant radiological damage progression, indicating that methotrexate monotherapy and DAS- (≤2.4) steered treatment might be insufficient to adequately suppress joint damage progression in these patients. Show less
Objective To compare nine disease activity indices and the new American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) remission criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and... Show moreObjective To compare nine disease activity indices and the new American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) remission criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to relate these to physical function and joint damage progression. Methods Five-year data from the BeSt study were used, a randomised clinical trial comparing four treatment strategies in 508 patients with recent-onset RA. Every three months disease activity was assessed with nine indices (Disease Activity Score (DAS), DAS-C reactive proteine (DAS-CRP), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS-28), DAS28-CRP, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and three DAS versions with adjusted tender joint scores) and categorized into remission, low, moderate and high disease activity (LDA, MDA, HDA). In addition, the recent ACR/EULAR clinical trial and practice remission was assessed 3-monthly with 28 and 68/66 joint counts. For each index, Generalized Estimating Equations analyses were performed to relate disease activity levels and the absence/presence of remission to 3-monthly assessments of physical functioning and annual radiological progression. Results From the composite indices, CDAI and SDAI were the most stringent definitions of remission and classified more patients as LDA. DAS28 and DAS28-CRP had the highest proportions of remission and MDA and a smaller proportion of LDA. ACR/EULAR remission percentages were comparable to CDAI/SDAI: remission percentages. The variant including CRP and 68/66 joint counts was the most stringent. For all indices, higher levels of disease activity were associated with decreased physical functioning and more radiological damage progression. Despite differences in classification between the indices, no major differences in relation to the two outcomes were observed. Conclusion The associations of nine composite indices and ACR/EULAR remission criteria with functional status and joint damage progression showed high accordance, whereas the proportions of patients classified in the disease activity levels differed. Show less
Objective To describe the disease course after the cessation of infliximab in early rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease activity score (DAS)-steered treatment and to identify predictors of... Show moreObjective To describe the disease course after the cessation of infliximab in early rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease activity score (DAS)-steered treatment and to identify predictors of persistent low disease activity. Methods In a post-hoc analysis of the BeSt study, disease activity and joint damage progression were observed in patients treated with methotrexate plus infliximab, who discontinued infliximab after achieving low disease activity (DAS = 2.4) for 6 months. Predictors were identified using Cox regression analysis. Results 104 patients discontinued infl iximab, of whom 77 had received infl iximab plus methotrexate as initial treatment. Mean DAS at the time of infl iximab cessation was 1.3, median symptom duration was 23 months and median Sharp/van derHeijde score was 5.5. The median follow-up was 7.2 years. Infliximab was re-introduced after loss of low disease activity in 48%, after a median of 17 months. The joint damage progression rate did not increase in the year after cessation, regardless of flare. After re-introduction of infl iximab, 84% of these patients again achieved a DAS = 2.4. In the multivariable model, smoking, infl iximab treatment duration = 18 months and shared epitope (SE) were independently associated with the re-introduction of infl iximab: 6% of the non-smoking, SE-negative patients treated < 18 months needed infl iximab re-introduction. Conclusion Cessation of infl iximab was successful in 52%, with numerically higher success rates in patients initially treated with infl iximab. Of the 48% who flared, 84% regained low disease activity. The joint damage progression rate did not increase in the year after cessation. Smoking, long infl iximab treatment duration and SE were independently associated with re-introduction of infl iximab. Show less
Koevoets, R.; Klarenbeek, N.B.; Guler-Yuksel, M.; Oosterhout, M. van; Krugten, M.V. van; Kerstens, P.J.S.M.; ... ; Allaart, C.F. 2011
Objective To evaluate three disease activity score (DAS) alternatives without the Ritchie articular index (RAI). To compare the use of patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity versus... Show moreObjective To evaluate three disease activity score (DAS) alternatives without the Ritchie articular index (RAI). To compare the use of patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity versus global assessment of health (GH) in DAS, DAS alternatives and DAS28. Methods Data from the BeSt study were used, a treatment strategy trial in early rheumatoid arthritis patients aiming at a DAS <= 2.4. DAS alternatives were DAS 0-1, with the RAI (0-3) reduced to a no-yes (0-1) score, DAS tender joint count 53 (DAS TJC53), with a 0-1 TJC in 53 separate joints and DAS TJC44 in 44 joints. Correlation patterns, mean difference from original DAS, classification differences in disease activity level and patient percentages with radiological damage progression per level were determined for all scores. Results In the majority of patients the scores were equal and correlation was high. Mean difference with the DAS at year 1 was -0.03 for DAS 0-1, 0.18 for DAS TJC53 and 0.11 for DAS TJC44. Classification agreement between scores was high (kappa year 1 0.76-0.98). Patient percentages with joint damage progression were similar for all scores. DAS, DAS alternative and DAS28 perform similarly using either PGA or GH. Conclusion DAS without the RAI perform comparably to the original DAS and may be chosen as alternatives. PGA can replace GH in the DAS, the alternatives and DAS28. Show less
Klarenbeek, N.B.; Guler-Yuksel, M.; Heijde, D.M.F.M. van der; Kerstens, P.J.S.M.; Mallee, C.; Westedt, M.L.; ... ; Allaart, C.F. 2011
Objectives To determine the relapse rate after discontinuing treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA) in sustained clinical remission, to identify predictors of a relapse and to... Show moreObjectives To determine the relapse rate after discontinuing treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA) in sustained clinical remission, to identify predictors of a relapse and to evaluate treatment response after restarting treatment. Methods Five-year data from the BeSt study were used, in which 508 patients with recent-onset RA were randomised into four dynamic treatment strategies, aiming at a disease activity score (DAS) = <= 2.4. When DAS was < 1.6 for = <= 6 months, the last disease-modifying antirheumatic drug ( DMARD) was tapered and discontinued. If DAS increased to = 1.6, the last DMARD was immediately reintroduced. Results During a 5-year period, 115/508 patients (23%) achieved drug-free remission. Of these, 53 patients (46%) restarted treatment because the DAS was = 1.6 after a median of 5 months, 59 patients (51%) remained in drug-free remission for a median duration of 23 months and 3 (3%) were lost to follow-up. In those who restarted treatment, mean (SD) DAS increased from 1.13 (0.73) at remission before tapering to 2.18 (0.65) at restart, reflecting an increase in all four components of DAS. Multivariable predictors for restarting treatment were anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), last DMARD sulfasalazine, low baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire score and high mean DAS until remission. Of the 53 patients who restarted treatment, 39 (74%) again achieved remission 3-6 months after the restart. The median (IQR) damage progression in those who restarted treatment during the year of DAS increase was 0 (0-1) Sharp-van der Heijde units. Conclusion During 5 years DAS steered treatment, nearly 25% of patients with RA achieved drug-free remission; 46% restarted DMARD monotherapy because of a relapse, the majority of whom again achieved clinical remission within 3-6 months without showing radiological progression during the relapse. Show less
Klarenbeek, N.B.; Kooij, S.M. van der; Guler-Yuksel, M.; Groenendael, J.H.L.M. van; Han, K.H.; Kerstens, P.J.S.M.; ... ; Allaart, C.F. 2011
OBJECTIVES To determine the relapse rate after discontinuing treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained clinical remission, to identify predictors of a relapse and to... Show moreOBJECTIVES To determine the relapse rate after discontinuing treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained clinical remission, to identify predictors of a relapse and to evaluate treatment response after restarting treatment. METHODS Five-year data from the BeSt study were used, in which 508 patients with recent-onset RA were randomised into four dynamic treatment strategies, aiming at a disease activity score (DAS) ≤ 2.4. When DAS was < 1.6 for ≥ 6 months, the last disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) was tapered and discontinued. If DAS increased to ≥ 1.6, the last DMARD was immediately reintroduced. RESULTS During a 5-year period, 115/508 patients (23%) achieved drug-free remission. Of these, 53 patients (46%) restarted treatment because the DAS was ≥ 1.6 after a median of 5 months, 59 patients (51%) remained in drug-free remission for a median duration of 23 months and 3 (3%) were lost to follow-up. In those who restarted treatment, mean (SD) DAS increased from 1.13 (0.73) at remission before tapering to 2.18 (0.65) at restart, reflecting an increase in all four components of DAS. Multivariable predictors for restarting treatment were anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP), last DMARD sulfasalazine, low baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire score and high mean DAS until remission. Of the 53 patients who restarted treatment, 39 (74%) again achieved remission 3-6 months after the restart. The median (IQR) damage progression in those who restarted treatment during the year of DAS increase was 0 (0-1) Sharp-van der Heijde units. CONCLUSION During 5 years DAS steered treatment, nearly 25% of patients with RA achieved drug-free remission; 46% restarted DMARD monotherapy because of a relapse, the majority of whom again achieved clinical remission within 3-6 months without showing radiological progression during the relapse. Show less
Kooi, E. van der; Klarenbeek, N.B.; Guler-Yuksel, M.; Kerstens, P.J.S.M.; Lubbe, P.A.H.M. van der; Westedt, M.L.; ... ; Allaart, C.F. 2011
Objective To assess the relationship between a decrease in disease activity score (DAS) and functional ability during 5 years of DAS-steered treatment in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA)... Show moreObjective To assess the relationship between a decrease in disease activity score (DAS) and functional ability during 5 years of DAS-steered treatment in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, taking into account absolute DAS levels and follow-up duration. Methods Data from the BeSt study were used, in which treatment was aimed at achieving DAS <= 2.4. The longitudinal relationship between 3-monthly measured DAS and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score was assessed using linear mixed modelling during 5 years of treatment, with DAS and HAQ 3 months earlier, change in DAS in last 3 months (delta DAS), time (log-transformed) and their interactions as determinants. Results Predictors for HAQ were: previous DAS, delta DAS, In time, the interaction previous DAS x delta DAS, and previous HAQ. The interaction In time x delta DAS was non-significant, indicating that the association between delta DAS and HAQ was independent of follow-up duration. A decrease from a higher DAS was associated with a smaller HAQ decrease than for a similar decrease from a lower DAS, indicating a non-linear relationship between DAS and HAQ. Conclusion At any time during 5 years of follow-up, a decrease in DAS was associated with a better functional ability. The magnitude of HAQ improvement depends on the DAS decrease and on the absolute DAS level. Show less