Purpose To evaluate cost-effectiveness of an [F-1(8)]FDG-PET/CT-driven diagnostic workup as compared to diagnostic surgery, for thyroid nodules with Bethesda III/IV cytology. [F-1(8)]FDG-PET/CT... Show morePurpose To evaluate cost-effectiveness of an [F-1(8)]FDG-PET/CT-driven diagnostic workup as compared to diagnostic surgery, for thyroid nodules with Bethesda III/IV cytology. [F-1(8)]FDG-PET/CT avoids 40% of futile diagnostic surgeries for benign Bethesda III/IV nodules.Methods Lifelong societal costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were assessed for 132 patients participating in a randomised controlled multicentre trial comparing [F-18]FDG-PET/CT to diagnostic surgery. The observed 1-year trial results were extrapolated using a Markov model. The probability of cost-effectiveness was estimated using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, taking uncertainty about sampling, imputation, and parameters into account.Results The observed 1-year cost difference of [F-18]FDG-PET/CT as compared to diagnostic surgery was - (sic)1000 (95% CI: - (sic)2100 to CO) for thyroid nodule-related care (p = 0.06). From the broader societal perspective, the 1-year difference in total societal costs was - (sic)4500 (- (sic)9200 to (sic)150) (p = 0.06). Over the modelled lifelong period, the cost difference was - (sic)9900 (- C23,100 to (sic)3200) (p =0.14). The difference in QALYs was 0.019 (- 0.045 to 0.083) at 1 year (p =0.57) and 0.402 (- 0.581 to 1.385) over the lifelong period (p =0.42). For a willingness to pay of (sic)50,000 per QALY, an [F-18] FDG-PET/CT-driven work-up was the cost-effective strategy with 84% certainty.Conclusion Following the observed reduction in diagnostic surgery, an [F-18]FDG-PET/CT-driven diagnostic workup reduced the 1-year thyroid nodule-related and societal costs while sustaining quality of life. It is very likely cost-effective as compared to diagnostic surgery for Bethesda III/IV nodules. Show less
Purpose To assess the impact of an [F-18]FDG-PET/CT-driven diagnostic workup to rule out malignancy, avoid futile diagnostic surgeries, and improve patient outcomes in thyroid nodules with... Show morePurpose To assess the impact of an [F-18]FDG-PET/CT-driven diagnostic workup to rule out malignancy, avoid futile diagnostic surgeries, and improve patient outcomes in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.Methods In this double-blinded, randomised controlled multicentre trial, 132 adult euthyroid patients with scheduled diagnostic surgery for a Bethesda III or IV thyroid nodule underwent [F-18]FDG-PET/CT and were randomised to an [F-18] FDG-PET/CT-driven or diagnostic surgery group. In the [F-18]FDG-PET/CT-driven group, management was based on the [F-18]FDG-PET/CT result: when the index nodule was visually [F-18]FDG-positive, diagnostic surgery was advised; when [F-18]FDG-negative, active surveillance was recommended. The nodule was presumed benign when it remained unchanged on ultrasound surveillance. In the diagnostic surgery group, all patients were advised to proceed to the scheduled surgery, according to current guidelines. The primary outcome was the fraction of unbeneficial patient management in one year, i.e., diagnostic surgery for benign nodules and active surveillance for malignant/borderline nodules. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Subgroup analyses were performed for non-Hurthle cell and Hurthle cell nodules.Results Patient management was unbeneficial in 42% (38/91 [95% confidence interval [CI], 32-53%]) of patients in the [F-18] FDG-PET/CT-driven group, as compared to 83% (34/41 [95% CI, 68-93%]) in the diagnostic surgery group (p < 0.001). [F-18]FDG-PET/CT-driven management avoided 40% (25/63 [95% CI, 28-53%]) diagnostic surgeries for benign nodules: 48% (23/48 [95% CI, 33-63%]) in non-Hurthle cell and 13% (2/15 [95% CI, 2-40%]) in I-Liable cell nodules (p = 0.02). No malignant or borderline tumours were observed in patients under surveillance. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and benign call rate (95% CI) of [F-18]FDG-PET/CT were 94.1% (80.3-99.3%), 39.8% (30.0-50.2%), 95.1% (83.5-99.4%), 35.2% (25.4-45.9%), and 31.1% (23.3-39.7%), respectively.Conclusion An [F-18]FDG-PET/CT-driven diagnostic workup of indeterminate thyroid nodules leads to practice changing management, accurately and oncologically safely reducing futile surgeries by 40%. For optimal therapeutic yield, application should be limited to non-Hurthle cell nodules. Show less
Objective To investigate the effect of diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone app in individuals with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy.Research design and methods Open... Show moreObjective To investigate the effect of diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone app in individuals with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy.Research design and methods Open two-arm multicenter parallel randomized controlled superiority trial. The intervention group (n=115) received theory and evidence-based self-management education and support via a smartphone app (optionally two or six times per week, once daily at different times). The control group (n=115) received care as usual. Primary outcome: HbA1c at 6 months. Other outcomes included HbA1c <= 53 mmol/mol (<= 7%) without any hypoglycemic event, body mass index, glycemic variability, dietary habits and quality of life. We performed multiple imputation and regression models adjusted for baseline value, age, sex, diabetes duration and insulin dose.Results Sixty-six general practices and five hospital outpatient clinics recruited 230 participants. Baseline HbA1c was comparable between groups (8.1% and 8.3%, respectively). At 6 months, the HbA1c was 63.8 mmol/mol (8.0%) in the intervention vs 66.2 mmol/mol (8.2%) in the control group; adjusted difference -0.93 mmol/mol (-0.08%), 95% CI -4.02 to 2.17 mmol/mol (-0.37% to 0.20%), p=0.557. The odds for achieving an HbA1c level <= 7% without any hypoglycemic event was lower in the intervention group: OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.35. There was no effect on secondary outcomes. No adverse events were reported.Conclusions This smartphone app providing diabetes self-management education and support had small and clinically not relevant effects. Apps should be more personalized and target individuals who think the app will be useful for them. Show less
