Aims: Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) is suggested as potentially effective and safe treatment for patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the current... Show moreAims: Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) is suggested as potentially effective and safe treatment for patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the current prospective knowledge base and experience with STAR is limited. In this study we aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of STAR. Methods and results: The StereoTactic Arrhythmia Radiotherapy in the Netherlands no.1 was a pre-post intervention study to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of STAR. In patients with therapy-refractory VT, the pro-arrhythmic region was treated with a 25 Gy single radiotherapy fraction. The main efficacy measure was a reduction in the number of treated VT-episodes by >= 50%, comparing the 12 months before and after treatment (or end of follow-up, excluding a 6-week blanking period). The study was deemed positive when >= 50% of patients would meet this criterion. Safety evaluation included left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary function, and adverse events. Six male patients with an ischaemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled, and median age was 73 years (range 54-83). Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 38% (range 24-52). The median planning target volume was 187 mL (range 93-372). Four (67%) patients completed the 12-month follow-up, and two patients died (not STAR related) during follow-up. The main efficacy measure of >= 50% reduction in treated VT-episodes at the end of follow-up was achieved in four patients (67%). The median number of treated VT-episodes was reduced by 87%. No reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction or pulmonary function was observed. No treatment related serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: STAR resulted in a >= 50% reduction in treated VT-episodes in 4/6 (67%) patients. No reduction in cardiac and pulmonary function nor treatment-related serious adverse events were observed during follow-up. Show less
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine survival, local and distant control, toxicity, and prognostic factors in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with... Show morePurpose: The purpose of this study was to determine survival, local and distant control, toxicity, and prognostic factors in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT).Methods and Materials: Consecutive patients with stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC (N = 154) staged with (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography were retrospectively selected (2005-2015). CCRT consisted of daily low-dose cisplatin (6 mg/m(2)) combined with 24 fractions of 2.75 Gy to a total dose of 66 Gy.Results: During a median follow-up period of 22 months (range, 1-92 months) the median overall survival was 36 months. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-86%), 61% (95% CI, 54%-70%), 52% (95% CI, 43%-60%), and 40% (95% CI, 31%-51%), respectively. The local relapse-free survival at 5 years was 55% (95% CI, 44%-69%). Metastasis-free survival at 5 years was 53% (95% CI, 44%-65%). The incidence of severe gastrointestinal disorders (grade 3-5) was 11%, among which grade 3 radiation esophagitis was 8.4%. The incidence of severe respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (grade 3-5) was 8.4%, among which grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was 1.3%. Predictors of overall survival were lymph node gross tumor volume (GTV) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.007; 95% CI, 1.000-1.012) and sex (HR, 0.500; 95% CI, 0.320-0.870) in favor of women. Although lymph node GTV was a predictor of treatment toxicity (HR, 1.010; 95% CI, 1.000-1.013), tumor GTV was the predictor for distant metastasis during follow-up (HR, 1.002; 95% CI, 1.0011.003).Conclusions: CCRT with daily low-dose cisplatin for locally advanced stage III NSCLC resulted in promising overall survival (3-year survival rate of 52% and 5-year survival rate of 40%) with low toxicity. Lymph node GTV, tumor GTV, and sex were predictors of overall survival, treatment toxicity, and distant metastasis. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. Show less
Background and purpose: The aim was to investigate whether the use of metformin during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improved treatment... Show moreBackground and purpose: The aim was to investigate whether the use of metformin during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improved treatment outcome.Material and methods: A total of 682 patients were included in this retrospective cohort study (59 metformin users, 623 control patients). All received cCRT in one of three participating radiation oncology departments in the Netherlands between January 2008 and January 2013. Primary endpoint was locoregional recurrence free survival (LRFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS).Results: No significant differences in LRFS or OS were found. Metformin use was associated with an improved DMFS (74% versus 53% at 2 years; p = 0.01) and PFS (58% versus 37% at 2 years and a median PFS of 41 months versus 15 months; p = 0.01). In a multivariate cox-regression analysis, the use of metformin was a statistically significant independent variable for DMFS and PFS (p = 0.02 and 0.03).Conclusions: Metformin use during cCRT is associated with an improved DMFS and PFS for locally advanced NSCLC patients, suggesting that metformin may be a valuable treatment addition in these patients. Evidently, our results merit to be verified in a prospective trial. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
