ObjectiveTo compare the effect of two different automated oxygen control devices on time preterm infants spent in different oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) ranges during their entire stay in the... Show moreObjectiveTo compare the effect of two different automated oxygen control devices on time preterm infants spent in different oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) ranges during their entire stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). DesignRetrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. SettingTertiary level neonatal unit in the Netherlands. PatientsPreterm infants (OxyGenie 75 infants, CLiO2 111 infants) born at 24-29 weeks' gestation receiving at least 72 hours of respiratory support between October 2015 and November 2020. InterventionsInspired oxygen concentration was titrated by the OxyGenie controller (SLE6000 ventilator) between February 2019 and November 2020 and the CLiO2 controller (AVEA ventilator) between October 2015 and December 2018 as standard of care. Main outcome measuresTime spent within SpO(2) target range (TR, 91-95% for either epoch) and other SpO(2) ranges. ResultsTime spent within the SpO(2) TR when receiving supplemental oxygen was higher during OxyGenie control (median 71.5 [IQR 64.6-77.0]% vs 51.3 [47.3-58.5]%, p<0.001). Infants under OxyGenie control spent less time in hypoxic and hyperoxic ranges (SpO(2)<80%: 0.7 [0.4-1.4]% vs 1.2 [0.7-2.3]%, p98%: 1.0 [0.5-2.4]% vs 4.0 [2.0-7.9]%, p<0.001). Both groups received a similar FiO(2) (29.5 [28.0-33.2]% vs 29.6 [27.7-32.1]%, p=not significant). ConclusionsOxygen saturation targeting was significantly different in the OxyGenie epoch in preterm infants, with less time in hypoxic and hyperoxic SpO(2) ranges during their stay in the NICU. Show less
Background: Large amounts of data are collected in neonatal intensive care units, which could be used for research. It is unclear whether these data, usually sampled at a lower frequency, are... Show moreBackground: Large amounts of data are collected in neonatal intensive care units, which could be used for research. It is unclear whether these data, usually sampled at a lower frequency, are sufficient for retrospective studies. We investigated what to expect when using one-per-minute data for descriptive statistics. Methods: One-per-second inspiratory oxygen and saturation were processed to one-per-minute data and compared, on average, standard deviation, target range time, hypoxia, days of supplemental oxygen, and missing signal. Results: Outcomes calculated from data recordings (one-per-minute = 92, one-per-second = 92) showed very little to no difference. Sub analyses of recordings under 100 and 200 h showed no difference. Conclusion: In our study, descriptive statistics of one-per-minute data were comparable to one-per-second and could be used for retrospective analyses. Comparable routinely collected one-per-minute data could be used to develop algorithms or find associations, retrospectively. Show less
Apnoea, a pause in respiration, is ubiquitous in preterm infants and are often associated with physiological instability, which may lead to longer-term adverse neurodevelopmental consequences.... Show moreApnoea, a pause in respiration, is ubiquitous in preterm infants and are often associated with physiological instability, which may lead to longer-term adverse neurodevelopmental consequences. Despite current therapies aimed at reducing the apnoea burden, preterm infants continue to exhibit apnoeic events throughout their hospital admission. Bedside staff are frequently required to manually intervene with different forms of stimuli, with the aim of re-establishing respiratory cadence and minimizing the physiological impact of each apnoeic event. Such a reactive approach makes apnoea and its associated adverse consequences inevitable and places a heavy reliance on human intervention. Different approaches to improving apnoea management in preterm infants have been investigated, including the use of various sensory stimuli. Despite studies reporting sensory stimuli of various forms to have potential in reducing apnoea frequency, non-invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation is the only automated stimulus currently used in the clinical setting for infants with persistent apnoeic events. We find that the development of automated closed-looped sensory stimulation systems for apnoea mitigation in preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support is warranted, including the possibility of stimulation being applied preventatively, and in a multi-modal form. Impact This review examines the effects of various forms of sensory stimulation on apnoea mitigation in preterm infants, namely localized tactile, generalized kinesthetic, airway pressure, auditory, and olfactory stimulations. Amongst the 31 studies reviewed, each form of sensory stimulation showed some positive effects, although the findings were not definitive and comparative studies were lacking. We find that the development of automated closed-loop sensory stimulation systems for apnoea mitigation is warranted, including the possibility of stimulation being applied preventatively, and in a multi-modal form. Show less
For the preterm infant with respiratory insufficiency requiring supplemental oxygen, tight control of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) is advocated, but difficult to achieve in practice. Automated... Show moreFor the preterm infant with respiratory insufficiency requiring supplemental oxygen, tight control of oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) is advocated, but difficult to achieve in practice. Automated control of oxygen delivery has emerged as a potential solution, with six control algorithms currently embedded in commercially-available respiratory support devices. To date, most clinical evaluations of these algorithms have been short-lived crossover studies, in which a benefit of automated over manual control of oxygen titration has been uniformly noted, along with a reduction in severe SpO(2) deviations and need for manual FiO(2) adjustments. A single non randomised study has examined the effect of implementation of automated oxygen control with the CLiO2 algorithm as standard care for preterm infants; no clear benefits in relation to clinical outcomes were noted, although duration of mechanical ventilation was lessened. The results of randomised controlled trials are awaited. Beyond the gathering of evidence regarding a treatment effect, we contend that there is a need for a better understanding of the function of contemporary control algorithms under a range of clinical conditions, further exploration of techniques of adaptation to individualise algorithm performance, and a concerted effort to apply this technology in low resource settings in which the majority of preterm infants receive care. Attainment of these goals will be paramount in optimisation of oxygen therapy for preterm infants globally. Show less
Objective To compare the effect of two different automated oxygen control devices on target range (TR) time and occurrence of hypoxaemic and hyperoxaemic episodes.Design Randomised cross-over study... Show moreObjective To compare the effect of two different automated oxygen control devices on target range (TR) time and occurrence of hypoxaemic and hyperoxaemic episodes.Design Randomised cross-over study.Setting Tertiary level neonatal unit in the Netherlands.Patients Preterm infants (n=15) born between 24+0 and 29+6 days of gestation, receiving invasive or non-invasive respiratory support with oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) TR of 91%-95%. Median gestational age 26 weeks and 4 days (IQR 25 weeks 3days-27 weeks 6 days) and postnatal age 19 (IQR 17-24) days.Interventions Inspired oxygen concentration was titrated by the OxyGenie controller (SLE6000 ventilator) and the CLIO2 controller (AVEA ventilator) for 24 hours each, in a random sequence, with the respiratory support mode kept constant.Main outcome measures Time spent within set SpO(2) TR (91%-95% with supplemental oxygen and 91%-100% without supplemental oxygen).Results Time spent within the SpO(2) TR was higher during OxyGenie control (80.2 (72.6-82.4)% vs 68.5 (56.7-79.3)%, p<0.005). Less time was spent above TR while in supplemental oxygen (6.3 (5.1-9.9)% vs 15.9 (11.5-30.7)%, p<0.005) but more time spent below TR during OxyGenie control (14.7 (11.8%-17.2%) vs 9.3 (8.2-12.6)%, p<0.05). There was no significant difference in time with SpO(2) <80% (0.5 (0.1-1.0)% vs 0.2 (0.1-0.4)%, p=0.061). Long-lasting SpO(2) deviations occurred less frequently during OxyGenie control.Conclusions The OxyGenie control algorithm was more effective in keeping the oxygen saturation within TR and preventing hyperoxaemia and equally effective in preventing hypoxaemia (SpO(2) <80%), although at the cost of a small increase in mild hypoxaemia. Show less
Background Automated oxygen control systems are finding their way into contemporary ventilators for preterm infants, each with its own algorithm, strategy and effect.Objective To provide guidance... Show moreBackground Automated oxygen control systems are finding their way into contemporary ventilators for preterm infants, each with its own algorithm, strategy and effect.Objective To provide guidance to clinicians seeking to comprehend automated oxygen control and possibly introduce this technology in their practice.Method A narrative review of the commercially available devices using different algorithms incorporating rule-based, proportional-integral-derivative and adaptive concepts are described and explained. An overview of how they work and, if available, the clinical effect is given.Results All algorithms have shown a beneficial effect on the proportion of time that oxygen saturation is within target range, and a decrease in hyperoxia and severe hypoxia. Automated oxygen control may also reduce the workload for bedside staff. There is concern that such devices could mask clinical deterioration, however this has not been reported to date.Conclusions So far, trials involving different algorithms are heterogenous in design and no head-to-head comparisons have been made, making it difficult to differentiate which algorithm is most effective and what clinicians can expect from algorithms under certain conditions. Show less
Salverda, H.H.; Oldenburger, N.J.; Rijken, M.; Pauws, S.C.; Dargaville, P.A.; Pas, A.B. te 2021
Several studies demonstrated an increase in time spent within target range when automated oxygen control (AOC) is used. However the effect on clinical outcome remains unclear. We compared clinical... Show moreSeveral studies demonstrated an increase in time spent within target range when automated oxygen control (AOC) is used. However the effect on clinical outcome remains unclear. We compared clinical outcomes of preterm infants born before and after implementation of AOC as standard of care. In a retrospective pre-post implementation cohort study of outcomes for infants of 24-29 weeks gestational age receiving respiratory support before (2012-2015) and after (2015-2018) implementation of AOC as standard of care were compared. Outcomes of interest were mortality and complications of prematurity, number of ventilation days, and length of stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). A total of 588 infants were included (293 pre- vs 295 in the post-implementation cohort), with similar gestational age (27.8 weeks pre- vs 27.6 weeks post-implementation), birth weight (1033 grams vs 1035 grams) and other baseline characteristics. Mortality and rate of prematurity complications were not different between the groups. Length of stay in NICU was not different, but duration of invasive ventilation was shorter in infants who received AOC (6.4 +/- 10.1 vs 4.7 +/- 8.3, p = 0.029). Conclusion: In this pre-post comparison, the implementation of AOC did not lead to a change in mortality or morbidity during admission.What is Known:Prolonged and intermittent oxygen saturation deviations are associated with mortality and prematurity-related morbidities.Automated oxygen controllers can increase the time spent within oxygen saturation target range.What is New:Implementation of automated oxygen control as standard of care did not lead to a change in mortality or morbidity during admission.In the period after implementation of automated oxygen control, there was a shift toward more non-invasive ventilation. Show less
