BackgroundIn humans, the effect of cannabis on ventilatory control is poorly studied, and consequently, the effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) remains unknown, particularly when THC is... Show moreBackgroundIn humans, the effect of cannabis on ventilatory control is poorly studied, and consequently, the effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) remains unknown, particularly when THC is combined with an opioid. We studied the effect of THC on breathing without and with oxycodone pretreatment. We hypothesised that THC causes respiratory depression, which is amplified when THC and oxycodone are combined.MethodsIn this randomised controlled crossover trial, healthy volunteers were administered inhaled Bedrocan® 100 mg (Bedrocan International B.V., Veendam, The Netherlands), a pharmaceutical-grade high-THC cannabis variant (21.8% THC; 0.1% cannabidiol), after placebo or oral oxycodone 20 mg pretreatment; THC was inhaled 1.5 and 4.5 h after placebo or oxycodone intake. The primary endpoint was isohypercapnic ventilation at an end-tidal Pco2 of 55 mm Hg or 7.3 kPa (VE55), measured at 1-h intervals for 7 h after placebo/oxycodone intake.ResultsIn 18 volunteers (age 22 yr [3]; 9 [50%] female), oxycodone produced a 30% decrease in VE55, whereas placebo was without effect on VE55. The first cannabis inhalation resulted in VE55 changing from 20.3 (3.1) to 23.8 (2.4) L min−1 (P=0.06) after placebo, and from 11.8 (2.8) to 13.0 (3.9) L min−1 (P=0.83) after oxycodone. The second cannabis inhalation also had no effect on VE55, but slightly increased sedation.ConclusionsIn humans, THC has no effect on ventilatory control after placebo or oxycodone pretreatment. Show less
Dam, C.J. van; Velzen, M. van; Kramers, C.; Schellekens, A.; Olofsen, E.; Niesters, M.; Dahan, A. 2023
Background Opioids continue to be widely prescribed for chronic noncancer pain, despite the awareness that opioids provide only short-time pain relief, lead to dose accumulation, have numerous... Show moreBackground Opioids continue to be widely prescribed for chronic noncancer pain, despite the awareness that opioids provide only short-time pain relief, lead to dose accumulation, have numerous adverse effects, and are difficult to wean. As an alternative, we previously showed advantages of using pharmaceutical-grade cannabis in a population of chronic pain patients with fibromyalgia. It remains unknown whether combining an opioid with pharmaceutical-grade cannabis has advantages, such as fewer side effects from lesser opioid consumption in chronic pain.Methods Trial design: a single-center, randomized, three-arm, open-label, exploratory trial.Trial population: 60 patients with fibromyalgia according to the 2010 definition of the American College of Rheumatologists.Intervention: Patients will be randomized to receive up to 4 daily 5 mg oral oxycodone sustained release (SR) tablet, up to 5 times 150 mg inhaled cannabis (Bediol (R), containing 6.3% delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and 8% cannabidiol), or the combination of both treatments. Treatment is aimed at self-titration with the daily maximum doses given. Treatment will continue for 6 weeks, after which there is a 6-week follow-up period.Main trial endpoint: The number of side effects observed during the course of treatment using a composite adverse effect score that includes the following 10 symptoms: dizziness (when getting up), sleepiness, insomnia, headache, nausea, vomiting, constipation, drug high, hallucinations, and paranoia.Secondary and tertiary endpoints include pain relief and number of oxycodone doses and cannabis inhalations.Discussion The trial is designed to determine whether self-titration of oxycodone and cannabis will reduce side effects in chronic pain patients with fibromyalgia. Show less
Dahan, A.; Dam, C.J. van; Niesters, M.; Velzen, M. van; Fossler, M.J.; Demitrack, M.A.; Olofsen, E. 2020
Background: To improve understanding of the respiratory behavior of oliceridine, a mu-opioid receptor agonist that selectively engages the G-protein-coupled signaling pathway with reduced... Show moreBackground: To improve understanding of the respiratory behavior of oliceridine, a mu-opioid receptor agonist that selectively engages the G-protein-coupled signaling pathway with reduced activation of the beta-arrestin pathway, the authors compared its utility function with that of morphine. It was hypothesized that at equianalgesia, oliceridine will produce less respiratory depression than morphine and that this is reflected in a superior utility.Methods: Data from a previous trial that compared the respiratory and analgesic effects of oliceridine and morphine in healthy male volunteers ( n = 30) were reanalyzed. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed and served as basis for construction of utility functions, which are objective functions of probability of analgesia, P(analgesia), and probability of respiratory depression, P(respiratory depression). The utility function = P(analgesia >= 0.5) - P(respiratory depression >= 0.25), where analgesia >= 0.5 is the increase in hand withdrawal latency in the cold pressor test by at least 50%, and respiratory depression >= 0.25 is the decrease of the hypercapnic ventilatory response by at least 25%. Values are median +/- standard error of the estimate.Results: The two drugs were equianalgesic with similar potency values (oliceridine: 27.9 +/- 4.9 ng/ml; morphine 34.3 +/- 9.7 ng/ml; potency ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.56). A 50% reduction of the hypercapnic ventilatory response by morphine occurred at an effect-site concentration of 33.7 +/- 4.8 ng/ml, while a 25% reduction by oliceridine occurred at 27.4 +/- 3.5 ng/ml (potency ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.72; P < 0.01). Over the clinically relevant concentration range of 0 to 35 ng/ml, the oliceridine utility function was positive, indicating that the probability of analgesia exceeds the probability of respiratory depression. In contrast, the morphine function was negative, indicative of a greater probability of respiratory depression than analgesia.Conclusions: These data indicate a favorable oliceridine safety profile over morphine when considering analgesia and respiratory depression over the clinical concentration range. Show less
Dahan, A.; Dam, C.J. van; Niesters, M.; Velzen, M. van; Fossler, M.J.; Demitrack, M.A.; Olofsen, E. 2020
BackgroundTo improve understanding of the respiratory behavior of oliceridine, a μ-opioid receptor agonist that selectively engages the G-protein–coupled signaling pathway with reduced activation... Show moreBackgroundTo improve understanding of the respiratory behavior of oliceridine, a μ-opioid receptor agonist that selectively engages the G-protein–coupled signaling pathway with reduced activation of the β-arrestin pathway, the authors compared its utility function with that of morphine. It was hypothesized that at equianalgesia, oliceridine will produce less respiratory depression than morphine and that this is reflected in a superior utility.MethodsData from a previous trial that compared the respiratory and analgesic effects of oliceridine and morphine in healthy male volunteers (n = 30) were reanalyzed. A population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analysis was performed and served as basis for construction of utility functions, which are objective functions of probability of analgesia, P(analgesia), and probability of respiratory depression, P(respiratory depression). The utility function = P(analgesia ≥ 0.5) – P(respiratory depression ≥ 0.25), where analgesia ≥ 0.5 is the increase in hand withdrawal latency in the cold pressor test by at least 50%, and respiratory depression ≥ 0.25 is the decrease of the hypercapnic ventilatory response by at least 25%. Values are median ± standard error of the estimate.ResultsThe two drugs were equianalgesic with similar potency values (oliceridine: 27.9 ± 4.9 ng/ml; morphine 34.3 ± 9.7 ng/ml; potency ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.56). A 50% reduction of the hypercapnic ventilatory response by morphine occurred at an effect-site concentration of 33.7 ± 4.8 ng/ml, while a 25% reduction by oliceridine occurred at 27.4 ± 3.5 ng/ml (potency ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.72; P < 0.01). Over the clinically relevant concentration range of 0 to 35 ng/ml, the oliceridine utility function was positive, indicating that the probability of analgesia exceeds the probability of respiratory depression. In contrast, the morphine function was negative, indicative of a greater probability of respiratory depression than analgesia.ConclusionsThese data indicate a favorable oliceridine safety profile over morphine when considering analgesia and respiratory depression over the clinical concentration range. Show less
Dam, C.J. van; Algera, M.H.; Olofsen, E.; Aarts, L.; Smith, T.; Velzen, M. van; ... ; Dahan, A. 2020
Opioids are complex drugs that produce profit (most importantly analgesia) as well as a myriad of adverse effects including gastrointestinal motility disturbances, abuse and addiction, sedation and... Show moreOpioids are complex drugs that produce profit (most importantly analgesia) as well as a myriad of adverse effects including gastrointestinal motility disturbances, abuse and addiction, sedation and potentially lethal respiratory depression (RD). Consequently, opioid treatment requires careful evaluation in terms of benefit on the one hand and harm on the other. Considering benefit and harm from an economic perspective, opioid treatment should lead to profit maximization with decision theory defining utility as (profit - loss). We here focus on the most devastating opioid adverse effect, RD and define opioid utility U = P(benefit) - P(harm), where P(benefit) is the probability of opioid-induced analgesia and P(harm) the probability of opioid-induced RD. Other utility functions are also discussed including the utility U = P(benefit AND NOT harm), the most wanted opioid effect, i.e., analgesia without RD, and utility surfaces, which depict the continuum of probabilities of presence or absence of analgesia in combination with the presence or absence of RD. Utility functions are constructed from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data sets, although pragmatic utility functions may be constructed when pharmacokinetic data are not available. We here discuss utilities of several opioids including the partial mu-opioid-receptor agonist buprenorphine, the full opioid receptor agonists fentanyl and alfentanil, and the bifunctional opioid cebranopadol, which acts at mu-opioid and nociception/orphanin FQ-receptors. We argue that utility functions give clinicians the opportunity to make an informed decision when opioid analgesics are needed for pain relief, in which opioids with a positive utility function are preferred over opioids with negative functions. Furthermore, utility functions of subpopulations will give an extra insight as a utility functions measured in one subgroup (e.g., patients with postoperative pain, good opioid responders) may not be mirrored in other patient subgroups ( e.g., neuropathic pain patients, poor opioid responders). Show less
