Background: The pharmacogenetic effect on cardiovascular disease reduction in response to statin treatment has only been assessed in small studies. In a pharmacogenetic genome wide association... Show moreBackground: The pharmacogenetic effect on cardiovascular disease reduction in response to statin treatment has only been assessed in small studies. In a pharmacogenetic genome wide association study (GWAS) analysis within the Genomic Investigation of Statin Therapy (GIST) consortium, we investigated whether genetic variation was associated with the response of statins on cardiovascular disease risk reduction.Methods: The investigated endpoint was incident myocardial infarction (MI) defined as coronary heart disease death and definite and suspect non-fatal MI. For imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), regression analysis was performed on expected allelic dosage and meta-analysed with a fixed-effects model, inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. All SNPs with p-values <5.0 x 10(-4) in stage 1 GWAS meta-analysis were selected for further investigation in stage-2. As a secondary analysis, we extracted SNPs from the Stage-1 GWAS meta-analysis results based on predefined hypotheses to possibly modifying the effect of statin therapy on MI.Results: In stage-1 meta-analysis (eight studies, n = 10,769, 4,212 cases), we observed no genome-wide significant results (p < 5.0 x 10(-8)). A total of 144 genetic variants were followed-up in the second stage (three studies, n = 1,525, 180 cases). In the combined meta-analysis, no genome-wide significant hits were identified. Moreover, none of the look-ups of SNPs known to be associated with either CHD or with statin response to cholesterol levels reached Bonferroni level of significance within our stage-1 meta-analysis.Conclusion: This GWAS analysis did not provide evidence that genetic variation affects statin response on cardiovascular risk reduction. It does not appear likely that genetic testing for predicting effects of statins on clinical events will become a useful tool in clinical practice. Show less
Irvin, M.R.; Sitlani, C.M.; Floyd, J.S.; Psaty, B.M.; Bis, J.C.; Wiggins, K.L.; ... ; CHARGE Pharmacogenetics Working Gr 2019
BACKGROUNDOnly a handful of genetic discovery efforts in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) have been described.METHODSWe conducted a case-control genome-wide association study of... Show moreBACKGROUNDOnly a handful of genetic discovery efforts in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) have been described.METHODSWe conducted a case-control genome-wide association study of aTRH among persons treated for hypertension, using data from 10 cohorts of European ancestry (EA) and 5 cohorts of African ancestry (AA). Cases were treated with 3 different antihypertensive medication classes and had blood pressure (BP) above goal (systolic BP >= 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP >= 90 mm Hg) or 4 or more medication classes regardless of BP control (n(EA) = 931, n(AA) = 228). Both a normotensive control group and a treatment-responsive control group were considered in separate analyses. Normotensive controls were untreated (n(EA) = 14,210, n(AA) = 2,480) and had systolic BP/diastolic BP < 140/90 mm Hg. Treatment-responsive controls (n(EA) = 5,266, n(AA) = 1,817) had BP at goal (<140/90 mm Hg), while treated with one antihypertensive medication class. Individual cohorts used logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, study site, and principal components for ancestry to examine the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with case-control status. Inverse variance-weighted fixed-effects meta-analyses were carried out using METAL.RESULTSThe known hypertension locus, CASZ1, was a top finding among EAs (P = 1.1 x 10(-8)) and in the race-combined analysis (P = 1.5 x 10(-9)) using the normotensive control group (rs12046278, odds ratio = 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.6-0.8)). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in this locus were robustly replicated in the Million Veterans Program (MVP) study in consideration of a treatment-responsive control group. There were no statistically significant findings for the discovery analyses including treatment-responsive controls.CONCLUSIONThis genomic discovery effort for aTRH identified CASZ1 as an aTRH risk locus. Show less
