In this study, we determined the crystal structure of an engineered human adenosine A2A receptor bound to a partial agonist and compared it to structures cocrystallized with either a full agonist... Show moreIn this study, we determined the crystal structure of an engineered human adenosine A2A receptor bound to a partial agonist and compared it to structures cocrystallized with either a full agonist or an antagonist/inverse agonist. The interaction between the partial agonist, belonging to a class of dicyanopyridines, and amino acids in the ligand binding pocket inspired us to develop a small library of derivatives and assess their affinity in radioligand binding studies and potency and intrinsic activity in a functional, label-free, intact cell assay. It appeared that some of the derivatives retained the partial agonist profile, whereas other ligands turned into inverse agonists. We rationalized this remarkable behavior with additional computational docking studies. Show less
TrendsRecent technological advances in membrane protein crystallization have resulted in a nearly exponential increase of available receptor structures. The AR family is an important example in... Show moreTrendsRecent technological advances in membrane protein crystallization have resulted in a nearly exponential increase of available receptor structures. The AR family is an important example in this respect. Crystal structures of antagonist- and agonist-bound adenosine A2A receptor have recently been supplemented by a fully activated conformation in complex with a G-protein mimic, and by antagonist bound structures of the A1 receptor.SDM experiments have been essential to identify residues involved in molecular interactions between ARs and their ligands. Leveraging on recent crystal structures, this vast amount of data can now be systematically classified and interconnected with chemical and structural information of ligands and receptors.The mapping of mutational data onto crystal structures provides new understanding of molecular interactions involved in ligand recognition. Together with computational modeling, this can be used as a roadmap to create novel hypotheses and assist in the design of more systematic mutagenesis studies to answer remaining structural and functional questions.The four adenosine receptors (ARs), A1, A2A, A2B, and A3, constitute a subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with exceptional foundations for structure-based ligand design. The vast amount of mutagenesis data, accumulated in the literature since the 1990s, has been recently supplemented with structural information, currently consisting of several inactive and active structures of the A2A and inactive conformations of the A1 ARs. We provide the first integrated view of the pharmacological, biochemical, and structural data available for this receptor family, by mapping onto the relevant crystal structures all site-directed mutagenesis data, curated and deposited at the GPCR database (available through http://www.gpcrdb.org). This analysis provides novel insights into ligand binding, allosteric modulation, and signaling of the AR family.Keywords: G protein-coupled receptor, adenosine receptor, mutagenesis, chemical modulationShow less
A considerable number of approved drugs show non-equilibrium binding characteristics, emphasizing the potential role of drug residence times for in vivo efficacy. Therefore, a detailed... Show moreA considerable number of approved drugs show non-equilibrium binding characteristics, emphasizing the potential role of drug residence times for in vivo efficacy. Therefore, a detailed understanding of the kinetics of association and dissociation of a target-ligand complex might provide crucial insight into the molecular mechanism-of-action of a compound. This deeper understanding will help to improve decision making in drug discovery, thus leading to a better selection of interesting compounds to be profiled further. In this review, we highlight the contributions of the Kinetics for Drug Discovery (K4DD) Consortium, which targets major open questions related to binding kinetics in an industry-driven public-private partnership. Show less
Controlling the Dissociation of Ligands from the Adenosine A2A Receptor through Modulation of Salt Bridge StrengthElena Segala, Dong Guo, Robert K. Y. Cheng, Andrea Bortolato, Francesca Deflorian,...Show moreControlling the Dissociation of Ligands from the Adenosine A2A Receptor through Modulation of Salt Bridge StrengthElena Segala, Dong Guo, Robert K. Y. Cheng, Andrea Bortolato, Francesca Deflorian, Andrew S. Doré, James C. Errey, Laura H. Heitman, Adriaan P. IJzerman, Fiona H. Marshall, and Robert M. CookeHeptares Therapeutics Ltd, Biopark Broadwater Road, Welwyn Garden City AL7 3AX, U.K.Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, the NetherlandsAbstractThe association and dissociation kinetics of ligands binding to proteins vary considerably, but the mechanisms behind this variability are poorly understood, limiting their utilization for drug discovery. This is particularly so for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) where high resolution structural information is only beginning to emerge. Engineering the human A2A adenosine receptor has allowed structures to be solved in complex with the reference compound ZM241385 and four related ligands at high resolution. Differences between the structures are limited, with the most pronounced being the interaction of each ligand with a salt bridge on the extracellular side of the receptor. Mutagenesis experiments confirm the role of this salt bridge in controlling the dissociation kinetics of the ligands from the receptor, while molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate the ability of ligands to modulate salt bridge stability. These results shed light on a structural determinant of ligand dissociation kinetics and identify a means by which this property may be optimized. Show less
