Background In older people, both apathy and depression (which frequently co-occurs with apathy) have been associated with poor physical functioning, a major health concern. We investigated the... Show moreBackground In older people, both apathy and depression (which frequently co-occurs with apathy) have been associated with poor physical functioning, a major health concern. We investigated the association between apathy and physical functioning in older people without dementia and whether this association is modified by depression.Methods We used the data from 380 older participants (with and without depression) taking part in the Netherlands Study of Depression in Older Persons, with baseline scores on the Apathy Scale and baseline and 2-year follow-up scores on at least one measure of physical functioning. These included the International Physical Activities Questionnaire (IPAQ, self-reported), WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DASII mobility subset, self-reported), walking speed, or handgrip strength. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to examine the association between apathy at baseline and physical functioning at 2-year follow-up. We also investigated effect modification by sex, age, and depression.Results Cross-sectionally, participants with higher baseline Apathy Scale scores performed significantly worse on all measures of physical functioning. Longitudinally, higher baseline Apathy Scale scores were associated with higher delta scores on the IPAQ (B = -59.81) in the basic model, and higher delta scores on the WHO-DASII (B = .09) in all models. Apathy was not associated with higher delta scores for walking speed or handgrip strength. Furthermore, sex, age, and depression did not modify any association.Conclusion In a Dutch cohort of older people without dementia, apathy was associated with more decline in self-reported, but not in objective physical functioning. Sex, age, and depression did not modify these associations. In older people with apathy, subjective decline may precede decline in physical performance tests. Show less
Hegeman, A.; Schutter, N.; Comijs, H.; Holwerda, T.; Dekker, J.; Stek, M.; Mast, R. van der 2018
The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch version of the Kessler-10 (K10) as well as an extended version (EK10) in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care. Data are... Show moreThe aim of this study was to validate the Dutch version of the Kessler-10 (K10) as well as an extended version (EK10) in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care. Data are from 1607 participants (18 through 65 years, 68.8% female) of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), recruited from 65 general practitioners. Participants completed the K10, extended with five additional questions focusing on core anxiety symptoms, and were evaluated with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CID! lifetime version 2.1) to assess DSM-IV disorders (major depressive disorder, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia). Reliability (Cronbach's a) of the Dutch K10 was 0.94. Based on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for the K10 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder was found to be 0.87. The extended questions on the EK10 significantly improved the detection of anxiety disorders in particular. With a cut-off point of 20, the K10 reached a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.81 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. For the EK10, a cut-off point of 20 and/or at least one positive answer on the additional questions provided a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.75 for detecting any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. The Dutch version of the K10 is appropriate for screening depressive disorders in primary care, while the EK10 is preferred in screening for both depressive and anxiety disorders. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
