Introduction: The clinical role of the molecular endometrial cancer (EC) classification has not been fully explored in patients staged with lymphadenectomy or without adjuvant treatment, conditions... Show moreIntroduction: The clinical role of the molecular endometrial cancer (EC) classification has not been fully explored in patients staged with lymphadenectomy or without adjuvant treatment, conditions that could potentially moderate the prognostic value of the classification. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of the molecular subgroups in patients with high-grade EC staged by lymphadenectomy and those without adjuvant treatment.Methods: DNA-sequencing for the detection of pathogenic POLE-exonuclease domain mutations and immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and p53 expression were performed on 412 high-grade EC from the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database (2005-2012) to classify them as POLE-ultramutated (POLEmut), MMR-deficient (MMRd), p53-mutant (p53abn), or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Patients with stage IV or residual disease after surgery were excluded. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models were used for analysis.Results: Molecular analysis was successful in 367 EC; 251 patients had undergone lymphadenectomy. Five-year recurrence rates in this subgroup of patients was 36.7% for women with p53abn EC, 0.0% for POLEmut EC, 13.4% for MMRd EC and 42.9% for NSMP EC (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed among stage IA-IB patients. Among patients without adjuvant treatment (n = 264), none with POLEmut EC (n = 26) had a recurrence.Conclusion: The molecular EC classification has strong prognostic value, independent of clinicopathological factors, also among high-grade EC patients staged by lymphadenectomy and those without adjuvant treatment. The unfavourable prognosis of early-stage p53abn EC is not due to undetected lymph node metastasis, and the indolent behaviour of POLEmut EC is independent of adjuvant treatment. Show less
Boennelycke, M.; Peters, E.E.M.; Leon-Castillo, A.; Smit, V.T.H.B.M.; Bosse, T.; Christensen, I.J.; ... ; Hogdall, E. 2021
The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of histological subtype review of high-grade endometrial carcinoma (EC) and its prognostic impact in a large well-documented Danish nationwide... Show moreThe aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of histological subtype review of high-grade endometrial carcinoma (EC) and its prognostic impact in a large well-documented Danish nationwide cohort. From the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) 2005-2012 cohort, we included 425 patients with an original diagnosis of high-grade EC, independent of histologic subtype. Of these, at least one hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide from 396 cases (93.2%) was available for review. The histologic subtype was reviewed by specialized gynecopathologists blinded to the original diagnosis and clinical outcome. Interobserver variability between original and revised histologic subtypes was analyzed using simple Kappa statistics. Hazard ratios (HR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival were calculated for original and revised subtypes, respectively. Overall histologic subtype agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.42) with the highest agreement for endometrioid-type EC (EEC; 75.5%) and serous-type EC (SEC; 63.8%). For clear cell carcinoma and un-/dedifferentiated EC, agreement was significantly lower: 30.1% and 33.3% respectively. Of the 396 reviewed cases, only two (0.5%) were re-classified as low-grade EEC upon revision. Interestingly, GR3 EEC had better RFS than SEC with stronger significance after revision (HR 2.36 (95% CI 1.43-3.89), p = 0.001), compared to original diagnosis (HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.07-2.81), p = 0.024). In conclusion, this study confirmed that pathology review results in substantial shift in histological subtype in high-grade EC. After review, a stronger prognostic benefit for GR3 EEC as compared to other histological subtypes was observed. This work supports maintaining a low threshold for pathology revision of high-grade EC in clinical practice. Show less
Peters, E.E.M.; Léon-Castillo, A.; Hogdall, E.; Boennelycke, M.; Smit, V.T.H.B.M.; Hogdall, C.; ... ; Ortoft, G. 2021
Approximately 15% of patients with endometrial cancer present with high-risk disease (HREC). Moreover, assessing the extent of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) may provide prognostic insight... Show moreApproximately 15% of patients with endometrial cancer present with high-risk disease (HREC). Moreover, assessing the extent of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) may provide prognostic insight among patients with HREC. The aim of this study was to determine whether the extent of LVSI can serve as a prognostic factor in HREC. All cases of ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 2016 classified HREC in the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) diagnosed from 2005 to 2012 were reviewed for the presence and extent of LVSI (categorized using a 3-tiered definition). We used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate actuarial survival rates, both adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses were used to calculate the proportional hazard ratio (HR). A total of 376 patients were included in our analysis. Among 305 patients with stage I/II HREC, 8.2% and 6.2% had focal or substantial LVSI, respectively, compared with 12.7% and 38.0% of 71 patients with stage III/IV HREC, respectively. Moreover, the estimated 5-yr recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower among patients with substantial LVSI compared with patients with no LVSI for both stage I/II (HR: 2.8; P=0.011) and stage III/IV (HR: 2.9; P=0.003) patients. Similarly, overall survival was significantly lower among patients with substantial LVSI for both stage I/II (HR: 3.1; P<0.001) and stage III/IV (HR: 3.2; P=0.020) patients. In patients with HREC, substantial LVSI is an independent adverse prognostic factor for lymph node and distant metastases, leading to reduced survival. Thus, the extent of LVSI should be incorporated into routine pathology reports in order to guide the appropriate choice of adjuvant treatment. Show less
