Objectives To investigate whether there is a window of opportunity for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients and to assess which patient characteristics are associated with a longer diagnostic delay.... Show moreObjectives To investigate whether there is a window of opportunity for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients and to assess which patient characteristics are associated with a longer diagnostic delay. Methods All newly diagnosed, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve PsA patients who participated in the Dutch southwest Early PsA cohoRt and had ≥3 years of follow-up were studied. First, total delay was calculated as the time period between symptom onset and PsA diagnosis made by a rheumatologist and then split into patient and physician delays. The total delay was categorised into short (1 year). These groups were compared on clinical (Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) and Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission) and patientreported outcomes during 3 years follow-up. Results 708 PsA patients were studied of whom 136 (19%), 237 (33%) and 335 (47%) had a short, intermediate and long total delay, respectively. Patient delay was 1.0month and physician delay was 4.5 months. Patients with a short delay were more likely to achieve MDA (OR 2.55, p=0.003) and DAPSA remission (OR 2.35,p=0.004) compared with PsA patients with a long delay. Patientreported outcomes showed numerical but non-significant differences between the short and long delay groups. Female patients and those presenting with enthesitis, chronic back pain or normal C-reactive protein (CRP) had a longer delay. Conclusions In PsA, referral and diagnosis within 1 year is associated with better clinical outcomes, suggesting the presence of a window of opportunity. The most gain in referral could be obtained in physician delay and in females, patients with enthesitis, chronic back pain or normal CRP Show less
Kroon, F.P.B.; Damman, W.; Liu, R.N.; Bijsterbosch, J.; Meulenbelt, I.; Heijde, D. van der; Kloppenburg, M. 2018
Conclusion: Baseline structural damage and bone turnover activity, as reflected by BMLs, seem to be involved in knee OA progression. Moreover, progression in PFJ and TFJ seems to be related. (C)... Show moreConclusion: Baseline structural damage and bone turnover activity, as reflected by BMLs, seem to be involved in knee OA progression. Moreover, progression in PFJ and TFJ seems to be related. (C) 2015 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
Kroon, F.; Bijsterbosch, J.; Meulenbelt, I.; Rosendaal, F.R.; Heijde, D. van der; Kloppenburg, M. 2015
We investigated the clinical and radiographic disease course of hand osteoarthritis as well as determinants of poor clinical outcome and radiographic progression over a period of six years in 289... Show moreWe investigated the clinical and radiographic disease course of hand osteoarthritis as well as determinants of poor clinical outcome and radiographic progression over a period of six years in 289 patients with hand osteoarthritis. Because these patients had osteoarthritis at multiple joints this enabled us to not only assess the association between progression of osteoarhtiritis in different hand joints groups but also between progression of hand osteoarthritis and osteoarthritis change at the knee. In addition, genetic factors in hand osteoarthritis progression were investigated as well as the influence of illness perceptions. The hand osteoarthritis subsets erosive osteoarthritis and thumb base osteoarthritis are further characterised. In the last part of the thesis the clinimetric properties of a pain score for osteoarthritis and radiographic outcome measures for hand osteoarthritis are evaluated. Show less
Claessen, K.M.J.A.; Kloppenburg, M.; Kroon, H.M.; Bijsterbosch, J.; Pereira, A.M.; Romijn, H.A.; ... ; Meulenbelt, I. 2012
OBJECTIVE To investigate the factors associated with clinical progression and good prognosis in patients with lower limb osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS Cohort study of 145 patients with OA in either... Show moreOBJECTIVE To investigate the factors associated with clinical progression and good prognosis in patients with lower limb osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS Cohort study of 145 patients with OA in either knee, hip or both. Progression was defined as 1) new joint prosthesis or 2) increase in WOMAC pain or function score during 6-years follow-up above pre-defined thresholds. Patients without progression with decrease in WOMAC pain or function score lower than pre-defined thresholds were categorized as good prognosis. Relative risks (RRs) for progression and good prognosis with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated by comparing the highest tertile or category to the lowest tertile, for baseline determinants (age, sex, BMI, WOMAC pain and function scores, pain on physical examination, total range of motion (tROM), osteophytes and joint space narrowing (JSN) scores), and for worsening in WOMAC pain and function score in 1-year. Adjustments were performed for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS Follow-up was completed by 117 patients (81%, median age 60 years, 84% female); 62 (53%) and 31 patients (26%) showed progression and good prognosis, respectively. These following determinants were associated with progression: pain on physical examination (RR 1.2 (1.0 to 1.5)); tROM (1.4 (1.1 to 1.6); worsening in WOMAC pain (1.9 (1.2 to 2.3)); worsening in WOMAC function (2.4 (1.7 to 2.6)); osteophytes 1.5 (1.0 to 1.8); and JSN scores (2.3 (1.5 to 2.7)). Worsening in WOMAC pain (0.1 (0.1 to 0.8)) and function score (0.1 (0.1 to 0.7)), were negatively associated with good prognosis. CONCLUSION Worsening of self-reported pain and function in one year, limited tROM and higher osteophytes and JSN scores were associated with clinical progression. Worsening in WOMAC pain and function score in 1- year were associated with lower risk to have good prognosis. These findings help to inform patients with regard to their OA prognosis. Show less
OBJECTIVE To investigate the validity of joint space width (JSW) measurements in millimeters (mm) in hand osteoarthritis (OA) patients by comparison to controls, grading of joint space narrowing ... Show moreOBJECTIVE To investigate the validity of joint space width (JSW) measurements in millimeters (mm) in hand osteoarthritis (OA) patients by comparison to controls, grading of joint space narrowing (JSN), and clinical features. METHODS Hand radiographs of 235 hand OA patients (mean age 65 years, 83% women) and 471 controls were used. JSW was measured with semi-automated image analysis software in the distal, proximal interphalangeal and metacarpal joints (DIPJs, PIPJs and MCPJs). JSN (grade 0-3) was assessed using the osteoarthritis research society international (OARSI) atlas. Associations between the two methods and clinical determinants (presence of pain, nodes and/or erosions, decreased mobility) were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations with adjustments for age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and mean width of proximal phalanx. RESULTS JSW was measured in 5631 joints with a mean JSW of 0.98 mm (standard deviation (SD) 0.21), being the smallest for DIPJs (0.70 (SD 0.25)) and largest for MCPJs (1.40 (SD 0.25)). The JSN=0 group had a mean JSW of 1.28 mm (SD 0.34), the JSN=3 group 0.17 mm (SD 0.23). Controls had larger JSW than hand OA patients (P-value<0.001). In hand OA, females had smaller JSW than men (β -0.08, (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.15 to -0.01)) and lower JSW was associated with the presence of pain, nodes, erosions and decreased mobility (adjusted β -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.16), -0.37 (-0.40, -0.34), -0.61 (-0.68, -0.54) and -0.46 (-0.68, -0.24) respectively). These associations were similar for JSN in grades. CONCLUSION In hand OA the quantitative JSW measurement is a valid method to measure joint space and shows a good relation with clinical features. Show less
Objective: To investigate in which way body mass index (BMI) and alignment affect the risk for knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. Methods: Radiographs of 181 knees from 155 patients (85% female,... Show moreObjective: To investigate in which way body mass index (BMI) and alignment affect the risk for knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. Methods: Radiographs of 181 knees from 155 patients (85% female, mean age 60 years) with radiographic signs of OA were analyzed at baseline and after 6 years. Progression was defined as 1-point increase in joint space narrowing score in the medial or lateral tibiofemoral (TF) compartment or having knee prosthesis during the follow-up for knees with a Kellgren and Lawrence score >= 1 at baseline. BMI at baseline was classified as normal (<25 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-30) and obese (>30). Knee alignment on baseline radiographs was categorized as normal (TF angle between 182 degrees and 184 degrees) and malalignment (<182 degrees or >184 degrees). We estimated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval for knee OA progression for overweight and obese patients and for malaligned knees relative to normal using generalized estimating equations (GEE). Additionally, we estimated the added effect when BMI and malalignment were present together on progression of knee OA. Adjustments were made for age and sex. Results: Seventy-six knees (42%) showed progression: 27 in lateral and 66 in medial compartment. Knees from overweight and obese patients had an increased risk for progression (RR 2.4 (1.-3.6) and 2.9 (1.7-4.1), respectively). RRs of progression for malaligned, varus and valgus knee were 2.0 (1.3-2.8), 2.3 (1.4-3.1), and 1.7 (0.97-2.6), respectively. When BMI and malalignment were included in one model, the effect of overweight, obesity and malalignment did not change. The added effect when overweight and malalignment were present was 17%. Conclusion: Overweight is associated with progression of knee OA and shows a small interaction with alignment. Losing weight might be helpful in preventing the progression of knee OA. (C) 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Show less
