Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB) has proven to be a valuable tool for staging melanoma patients. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, this procedure has undergone several technologic... Show moreSentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB) has proven to be a valuable tool for staging melanoma patients. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, this procedure has undergone several technologic refinements, including the introduction of SPECT/CT, as well as radioguidance and fluorescence guidance. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of this technologic evolution on SNB in the head and neck region. The primary endpoint was the false-negative (FN) rate. Secondary endpoints were number of harvested SNs, overall operation time, operation time per harvested SN, and postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective database was queried for cutaneous head and neck melanoma patients who underwent SNB at The Netherlands Cancer Institute between 1993 and 2016. The implementation of new detection techniques was divided into 4 groups: 1993-2005, with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative use of both a y-ray detection probe and patent blue (n = 30); 2006-2007, with addition of preoperative road maps based on SPECT/CT (n = 15); 2008-2009, with intraoperative use of a portable y-camera (n = 40); and 2010-2016, with addition of near-infrared fluorescence guidance (n = 192). Results: In total, 277 patients were included. At least 1 SN was identified in all patients. A tumor-positive SN was found in 59 patients (21.3%): 10 in group 1 (33.3%), 3 in group 2 (20.0%), 6 in group 3 (15.0%), and 40 in group 4 (20.8%). Regional recurrences in patients with tumor negative SNs resulted in an overall FN rate of 11.9% (group 1, 16.7%; group 2, 0%; group 3, 14.3%; group 4, 11.1%). The number of harvested nodes increased with advancing technologies (P = 0.003), whereas Breslow thickness and operation time per harvested SN decreased (P = 0.003 and P = 0.017, respectively). There was no significant difference in percentage of tumor-positive SNs, overall operation time, and complication rate between the different groups. Conclusion: The use of advanced detection technologies led to a higher number of identified SNs without an increase in overall operation time, possibly indicating an improved surgical efficiency. Operation time per harvested SN decreased; the average FN rate remained 11.9% and was unchanged over 23 y. There was no significant change in postoperative complication rate. Show less
Background: Surgical resection is the standard of care for parotid gland tumors. Comprehensive reports on the surgical complications of parotidectomy are lacking. This study focuses on surgical... Show moreBackground: Surgical resection is the standard of care for parotid gland tumors. Comprehensive reports on the surgical complications of parotidectomy are lacking. This study focuses on surgical wound complications of parotid gland surgery.Patients and methods: In the period 2002-2012, 390 consecutive patients (395 procedures) who underwent parotid gland surgery were selected for retrospective analysis. Based on subsequent management, the impact of surgical site complications was graded by the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC).Results: In 83 (21.0%) of the procedures, at least one complication was registered. In total, 118 complications were described. Rated to CDC, 61 patients (15.4%) were graded as class 2 or higher. This implies therapy was dictated. Fortyfive (11.4%) of the complications were surgical site infections (551). In 9 patients (2.3%) surgical complications required a surgical intervention under general anesthesia (CDC class 3b), and in 19 patients (4.8%) other invasive treatment (CDC class 3a) was needed.Conclusions: The Clavien-Dindo Classification proved to be very useful for retrospective registration of surgical complications. Of the 61 patients, 33 were managed by conservative therapy. No risk profile was found for patients at risk for direct surgical complications. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved. Show less
