Importance Among patients with bipolar disorder, discordant findings have been published on the nephrotoxic effects of lithium therapy.Objective To quantify absolute and relative risks of chronic... Show moreImportance Among patients with bipolar disorder, discordant findings have been published on the nephrotoxic effects of lithium therapy.Objective To quantify absolute and relative risks of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and acute kidney injury (AKI) in people who initiated lithium compared with valproate therapy and to investigate the association between cumulative use and elevated lithium levels and kidney outcomes.Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study had a new-user active-comparator design and used inverse probability of treatment weights to minimize confounding. Included patients initiated therapy with lithium or valproate from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2018, and had a median follow-up of 4.5 years (IQR, 1.9-8.0 years). Data analysis began in September 2021, using routine health care data from the period 2006 to 2019 from the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements project, a recurrent health care use cohort of all adult residents in Stockholm, Sweden.Exposures New use of lithium vs new use of valproate and high (>1.0 mmol/L) vs low serum lithium levels.Main Outcomes and Measures Progression of CKD (composite of >30% decrease relative to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] and kidney failure), AKI (by diagnosis or transient creatinine elevations), new albuminuria, and annual eGFR decrease. Outcomes by attained lithium levels were also compared in lithium users.Results The study included 10946 people (median [IQR] age, 45 [32-59] years; 6227 female [56.9%]), of whom 5308 initiated lithium therapy and 5638 valproate therapy. During follow-up, 421 CKD progression events and 770 AKI events were identified. Compared with patients who received valproate, those who received lithium did not have increased risk of CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.86-1.45]) or AKI (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70-1.10]). Absolute 10-year CKD risks were low and similar: 8.4% in the lithium group and 8.2% in the valproate group. No difference in the risk of developing albuminuria or the annual rate of eGFR decrease was found between groups. Among more than 35000 routine lithium tests, only 3% of results were in the toxic range (>1.0 mmol/L). Lithium values greater than 1.0 mmol/L, compared with lithium values of 1.0 mmol/L or less, were associated with increased risk of CKD progression (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 0.97-8.45) and AKI (HR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.41-8.76).Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, compared with new use of valproate, new use of lithium was meaningfully associated with adverse kidney outcomes, with low absolute risks that did not differ between therapies. However, elevated serum lithium levels were associated with future kidney risks, particularly AKI, emphasizing the need for close monitoring and lithium dose adjustment. Show less
Trevisan, M.; Hjemdahl, P.; Clase, C.M.; Jong, Y. de; Evans, M.; Bellocco, R.; ... ; Carrero, J.J. 2023
Rationale & Objective: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have progressively replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in pa-tients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF).... Show moreRationale & Objective: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have progressively replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in pa-tients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). DOACs cause fewer bleeding complications, but their other advantages, particularly related to kid-ney outcomes, remain inconclusive. We studied the risks of chronic kidney disease (CKD) pro-gression and acute kidney injury (AKI) after DOAC and VKA administration for nonvalvular AF.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting & Participants: Cohort study of Swedish patients enrolled in the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) project with a diag-nosis of nonvalvular AF during 2011-2018. Exposure: Initiation of DOAC or VKA treatment.Outcome: Primary outcomes were CKD pro-gression (composite of >30% estimated glomer-ular filtration rate [eGFR] decline and kidney failure) and AKI (by diagnosis or KDIGO-defined transient creatinine elevations). Secondary outcomes were death, major bleeding, and the composite of stroke and systemic embolism.Analytical Approach: Propensity score weighted Cox regression was used to balance 50 baseline confounders. Sensitivity analyses included falsification end points, subgroups, and estima-tion of per-protocol effects.Results: We included 32,699 patients (56% initiated DOAC) who were observed for a me-dian of 3.8 years. Their median age was 75 years, 45% were women, and 27% had an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The adjusted HRs for DOAC versus VKA were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.9 8) for the risk of CKD progression and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.97) for AKI. HRs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.8 9) for major bleeding, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78-1.11) for the composite of stroke and systemic embolism, and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.95-1.14) for death. The results were similar across subgroups of age, sex, and baseline eGFR when restricting to patients at high risk for thromboembolic events and when censoring follow up at treatment discontinuation or change in type of anticoagulation.Limitations: Missing information on time in ther-apeutic range and treatment dosages.Conclusions: Among patients with nonvalvular AF treated in routine clinical practice compared with VKA use, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of CKD progression, AKI, and major bleeding but a similar risk of the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death. Show less
