Background: Severe multilineage cytopenia in childhood caused by bone marrow failure (BMF) often represents a serious condition requiring specific management. Patients are at risk for invasive... Show moreBackground: Severe multilineage cytopenia in childhood caused by bone marrow failure (BMF) often represents a serious condition requiring specific management. Patients are at risk for invasive infections and bleeding complications. Previous studies report low rates of identifiable causes of pediatric BMF, rendering most patients with a descriptive diagnosis such as aplastic anemia (AA). Methods: We conducted a multi-center prospective cohort study in which an extensive diagnostic approach for pediatric patients with suspected BMF was implemented. After exclusion of malignant and transient causes of BMF, patients entered thorough diagnostic evaluation including bone marrow analysis, whole exome sequencing (WES) including copy number variation (CNV) analysis and/or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) array analysis. In addition, functional and immunological evaluation were performed. Here we report the outcomes of the first 50 patients (2017-2021) evaluated by this approach. Results: In 20 patients (40%) a causative diagnosis was made. In this group, 18 diagnoses were established by genetic analysis, including 14 mutations and 4 chromosomal deletions. The 2 remaining patients had short telomeres while no causative genetic defect was found. Of the remaining 30 patients (60%), 21 were diagnosed with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) based on peripheral multi-lineage cytopenia and hypoplastic bone marrow, and 9 were classified as unexplained cytopenia without bone marrow hypoplasia. In total 28 patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) of which 22 patients with an unknown cause and 6 patients with an identified cause for BMF. Conclusion: We conclude that a standardized in-depth diagnostic protocol as presented here, can increase the frequency of identifiable causes within the heterogeneous group of pediatric BMF. We underline the importance of full genetic analysis complemented by functional tests of all patients as genetic causes are not limited to patients with typical (syndromal) clinical characteristics beyond cytopenia. In addition, it is of importance to apply genome wide genetic analysis, since defects in novel genes are frequently discovered in this group. Identification of a causal abnormality consequently has implications for the choice of treatment and in some cases prevention of invasive therapies. Show less
Atmar, K.; Tulling, A.J.; Lankester, A.C.; Bartels, M.; Smiers, F.J.; Burg, M. van der; Mohseny, A.B. 2022
BackgroundIn most patients with aplastic anemia (AA), the diagnosis is limited to a description of the symptoms. Lack of understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms causing bone... Show moreBackgroundIn most patients with aplastic anemia (AA), the diagnosis is limited to a description of the symptoms. Lack of understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms causing bone marrow failure (BMF), hampers tailored treatment. In these patients, auto-immune cell-mediated destruction of the bone marrow is often presumed to be the causative mechanism. The status of the bone marrow microenvironment, particularly the mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) component, was recently suggested as a potential player in the pathophysiology of AA. Therefore, functional, and immune modulatory characteristics of bone marrow MSCs might represent important parameters for AA.ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review to evaluate in vitro functional properties of MSCs derived from patients with AA compared to healthy controls.MethodsAccording to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was performed by using online databases (Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library). Studies reporting on phenotypical characterization, proliferation potential, differentiation capacity, immunomodulatory potential, and ability to support hematopoiesis were identified and screened using the Rayyan software tool.Results23 articles were included in this systematic review, describing a total of 324 patients with AA and 285 controls. None of the studies identified a significant difference in expression of any MSC surface marker between both groups. However, AA-MSCs showed a decreased proliferation potential, an increased tendency to differentiate into the adipogenic lineage and decreased propensity towards osteogenic differentiation. Importantly, AA-MSCs show reduced capacity of immunosuppression and hematopoietic support in comparison to healthy controls.ConclusionWe conclude that there are indications for a contribution of MSCs in the pathophysiology of AA. However, the current evidence is of poor quality and requires better defined study populations in addition to a more robust methodology to study MSC biology at a cellular and molecular level. Future studies on bone marrow microenvironment should aim at elucidating the interaction between MSCs, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and immune cells to identify impairments associated with/causing BMF in patients with AA. Show less
Meier, K.; Glatz, T.; Guijt, M.C.; Piccininni, M.; Meulen, M. van der; Atmar, K.; ... ; COVID 19 Survey Study Grp 2020
BackgroundThe extent to which people implement government-issued protective measures is critical in preventing further spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2... Show moreBackgroundThe extent to which people implement government-issued protective measures is critical in preventing further spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Our study aimed to describe the public belief in the effectiveness of protective measures, the reported implementation of these measures, and to identify communication channels used to acquire information on COVID-19 in European countries during the early stage of the pandemic.Methods and findingsAn online survey available in multiple languages was disseminated starting on March 19th, 2020. After five days, we computed descriptive statistics for countries with more than 500 respondents. Each day, we assessed enacted community containment measures by stage of stringency (I-IV). In total, 9,796 adults responded, of whom 8,611 resided in the Netherlands (stage III), 604 in Germany (stage III), and 581 in Italy (stage IV). To explore possible dynamics as containment strategies intensified, we also included 1,365 responses submitted during the following week. Participants indicated support for governmental measures related to avoiding social gatherings, selective closure of public places, and hand hygiene and respiratory measures (range for all measures: 95.0%-99.7%). Respondents from the Netherlands less frequently considered a complete social lockdown effective (59.2%), compared to respondents in Germany (76.6%) or Italy (87.2%). Italian residents applied enforced social distancing measures more frequently (range: 90.2%-99.3%, German and Dutch residents: 67.5%-97.0%) and self-initiated hygienic and social distancing behaviors (range: 36.3%-96.6%, German and Dutch residents: 28.3%-95.7%). Respondents reported being sufficiently informed about the outbreak and behaviors to avoid infection (range: 90.2%-91.1%). Information channels most commonly reported included television newspapers, official health websites, and social media. One week later, we observed no major differences in submitted responses.ConclusionsDuring the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, belief in the effectiveness of protective measures among survey respondents from three European countries was high and participants reported feeling sufficiently informed. In March 2020, implementation of measures differed between countries and were highest among respondents from Italy, who were subjected to the most stringent lockdown measures and greatest COVID-19 burden in Europe during this period. Show less
