Echocardiography-derived hemodynamic forces (HDF) allow calculation of intraventricular pressure gradients from routine transthoracic echocardiographic images. The evolution of HDF after cardiac... Show moreEchocardiography-derived hemodynamic forces (HDF) allow calculation of intraventricular pressure gradients from routine transthoracic echocardiographic images. The evolution of HDF after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has not been investigated in large cohorts. The aim was to assess HDF in patients with heart failure implanted with CRT versus healthy controls. HDF were assessed before and 6 months after CRT. The following HDF parameters were calculated: (1) apical-basal strength, (2) lateral-septal strength, (3) the ratio of lateral-septal to apical-basal strength ratio, and (4) the force vector angle (1 and 2 representing the magnitude of HDF, 3 and 4 representing the orientation of HDF). In the propulsive phase of systole, the apical-basal impulse and the systolic force vector angle were measured. A total of 197 patients were included (age 64 ± 11 years, 62% male), with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, QRS duration ≥130 ms and left bundle branch block. The magnitude of HDF was significantly lower and the orientation was significantly worse in patients with heart failure versus healthy controls. Immediately after CRT implantation, the apical-basal impulse and systolic force vector angle were significantly increased. Six months after CRT, improvement of apical-basal strength, lateral-septal to apical-basal strength ratio and the force vector angle occurred. When CRT was deactivated at 6 months, the increase in the magnitude of apical-basal HDF remained unchanged while the systolic force vector angle worsened significantly. In conclusion, HDF in CRT recipients reflect the acute effect of CRT and the effect of left ventricular reverse remodeling on intraventricular pressure gradients. Whether HDF analysis provides incremental value over established echocardiographic parameters, remains to be determined. Show less
BackgroundSecondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is a progressive disease with characteristic pathophysiological changes that may influence prognosis. Although the staging of SMR patients suffering... Show moreBackgroundSecondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is a progressive disease with characteristic pathophysiological changes that may influence prognosis. Although the staging of SMR patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to extramitral cardiac involvement has prognostic value in medically treated patients, such data are so far lacking for edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER).ObjectivesThis study sought to classify M-TEER patients into disease stages based on the phenotype of extramitral cardiac involvement and to assess its impact on symptomatic and survival outcomes.MethodsBased on echocardiographic and clinical assessment, patients were assigned to 1 of the following HFrEF-SMR groups: left ventricular involvement (Stage 1), left atrial involvement (Stage 2), right ventricular volume/pressure overload (Stage 3), or biventricular failure (Stage 4). A Cox regression model was implemented to investigate the impact of HFrEF-SMR stages on 2-year all-cause mortality. The symptomatic outcome was assessed with New York Heart Association functional class at follow-up.ResultsAmong a total of 849 eligible patients who underwent M-TEER for relevant SMR from 2008 until 2019, 9.5% (n = 81) presented with left ventricular involvement, 46% (n = 393) with left atrial involvement, 15% (n = 129) with right ventricular pressure/volume overload, and 29% (n = 246) with biventricular failure. An increase in HFrEF-SMR stage was associated with increased 2-year all-cause mortality after M-TEER (HR: 1.39; CI: 1.23-1.58; P < 0.01). Furthermore, higher HFrEF-SMR stages were associated with significantly less symptomatic improvement at follow-up.ConclusionsThe classification of M-TEER patients into HFrEF-SMR stages according to extramitral cardiac involvement provides prognostic value in terms of postinterventional survival and symptomatic improvement. Show less
Background: Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation (atrial TR) has received growing recognition as a TR entity with a distinct cause owing to its independence from valvular tethering as the... Show moreBackground: Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation (atrial TR) has received growing recognition as a TR entity with a distinct cause owing to its independence from valvular tethering as the predominant mechanism underlying TR. However, characterization of atrial TR varies, and a universal definition is lacking. Methods: In total, 651 patients with significant functional TR were analyzed, including 438 conservatively treated individuals and 213 patients who received transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR). Based on a clustering approach, we defined atrial TR as tricuspid valve (TV) tenting height <= 10 mm, midventricular right ventricular diameter <= 38 mm, and left ventricular ejection fraction >= 50%. Results: Patients with atrial TR were more often females, had higher right ventricular fractional area change, higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and lower LV end-diastolic diameter, TV tenting area and height, lower right ventricular and tricuspid annular size, enlarged, but lower right atrial area and lower TV effective regurgitant orifice area (all P<0.05). Patients with atrial TR had significantly better long-term survival than non-atrial TR in the conservatively treated TR cohort (P<0.01, n=438). Atrial TR was independently associated with a lower rate of the combined end point of mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 1-year follow-up in the TTVR cohort (hazard ratio, 0.39; P<0.05, n=213). TR degree was significantly reduced after TTVR in non-atrial and atrial TR (P<0.01). Functional parameters significantly improved following TTVR independent of TR cause (P<0.05). Conclusions: An echocardiography-based atrial TR definition is associated with prognostic relevance in patients with functional TR in conservatively treated TR and after TTVR. Show less
BACKGROUND The clinical course of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) remains incompletely defined.OBJECTIVES This study sought to analyze the clinical course of moderate AS and compare it... Show moreBACKGROUND The clinical course of patients with moderate aortic stenosis (AS) remains incompletely defined.OBJECTIVES This study sought to analyze the clinical course of moderate AS and compare it with other stages of the disease.METHODS Multiple electronic databases were searched to identify studies on adult moderate AS. Random-effects models were used to derive pooled estimates. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. The secondary endpoints were cardiac death, heart failure, sudden death, and aortic valve replacement.RESULTS Among a total of 25 studies (12,143 moderate AS patients, 3.7 years of follow-up), pooled rates per 100 person-years were 9.0 (95% CI: 6.9 to 11.7) for all-cause death, 4.9 (95% CI: 3.1 to 7.5) for cardiac death, 3.9 (95% CI: 1.9 to 8.2) for heart failure, 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8 to 1.5) for sudden death, and 7.2 (95% CI: 4.3 to 12.2) for aortic valve replacement. Meta-regression analyses detected that diabetes (P = 0.019), coronary artery disease (P = 0.017), presence of symptoms (P < 0.001), and left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (P = 0.009) were associated with a significant impact on the overall estimate of all-cause death. All-cause mortality was higher in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%) than with normal LV ejection fraction: 16.5 (95% CI: 5.2 to 52.3) and 4.2 (95% CI: 1.4 to 12.8) per 100 person-years, respectively. Compared with moderate AS, the incidence rate difference of all-cause mortality was-3.9 (95% CI:-6.7 to-1.1) for no or mild AS and +2.2 (95% CI: +0.8 to +3.5) for severe AS patients.CONCLUSIONS Moderate AS appears to be associated with a mortality risk higher than no or mild AS but lower than severe AS, which increases in specific population subsets. The impact of early intervention in moderate AS patients having high-risk features deserves further investigation. (C) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Show less
Stassen, J.; Galloo, X.; Hirasawa, K.; Bijl, P. van der; Leon, M.B.; Marsan, N.A.; Bax, J.J. 2022
Aims: Left atrial (LA) function is a strong prognostic marker in patients with heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation (MR). Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has shown to... Show moreAims: Left atrial (LA) function is a strong prognostic marker in patients with heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation (MR). Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has shown to improve MR severity, the interaction between a reduction in MR severity and an increase in LA function, as well as its association with outcomes, has not been investigated. Methods and results: LA reservoir strain (RS) was evaluated with speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with at least moderate functional MR undergoing CRT implantation. MR improvement was defined as at least 1 grade improvement in MR severity at 6 months after CRT implantation. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 340 patients (mean age 66 +/- 10 years, 73% male) were included, of whom 200 (59%) showed MR improvement at 6 months follow-up. On multivariable analysis, an improvement in MR severity was independently associated with an increase in LARS (odds ratio 1.008; 95% confidence interval 1.003-1.013; P = 0.002). After multivariable adjustment, including baseline and follow-up variables, an increase in LARS was significantly associated with lower mortality. MR improvers showing LARS increasement had the lowest mortality rate, whereas outcomes were not significantly different between MR non-improvers and MR improvers showing no LARS increasement (P = 0.236). Conclusion: A significant reduction in MR severity at 6 months after CRT implantation is independently associated with an increase in LARS. In addition, an increase in LARS is independently associated with lower all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and significant functional MR. Show less
Heart failure (HF) is among the most important and frequent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). The detection of subclinical dysfunction is a marker of HF risk and presents a potential target... Show moreHeart failure (HF) is among the most important and frequent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). The detection of subclinical dysfunction is a marker of HF risk and presents a potential target for reducing incident HF in DM. Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction secondary to DM is heterogeneous, with phenotypes including predominantly systolic, predominantly diastolic, and mixed dysfunction. Indeed, the pathogenesis of HF in this setting is heterogeneous. Effective management of this problem will require detailed phenotyping of the contributions of fibrosis, microcirculatory disturbance, abnormal metabolism, and sympathetic innervation, among other mechanisms. For this reason, an imaging strategy for the detection of HF risk needs to not only detect subclinical LV dysfunction (LVD) but also characterize its pathogenesis. At present, it is possible to identify individuals with DM at increased risk HF, and there is evidence that cardioprotection may be of benefit. However, there is insufficient justification for HF screening, because we need stronger evidence of the links between the detection of LVD, treatment, and improved outcome. This review discusses the options for screening for LVD, the potential means of identifying the underlying mechanisms, and the pathways to treatment. Show less
Aims Restrictive mitral annuloplasty (RMA) can provide a durable solution for functional mitral regurgitation (MR), but might result in obstruction to antegrade mitral flow. Aim of this study was... Show moreAims Restrictive mitral annuloplasty (RMA) can provide a durable solution for functional mitral regurgitation (MR), but might result in obstruction to antegrade mitral flow. Aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of change in mitral valve area (MVA) during exercise after RMA, to relate the change in MVA to left ventricular (LV) geometry and function, and to assess its haemodynamic and clinical impact.Methods and results Bicycle exercise echocardiography was performed in 32 patients after RMA. Echocardiographic data at rest and am !sults during exercise were compared with preoperative echocardiographic data. Clinical endpoints were collected following the study visit. MVA increased during exercise in 25 patients (1.6 +/- 0.4 cm(2) to 2.0 +/- 0.6 cm(2), P < 0.001), whereas MVA decreased in 7 patients (1.8 +/- 0.5 cm(2) to 1.5 +/- 0.4 cm(2), P = 0.020). Patients with an increased MVA showed a significant reduction in LV volumes at rest compared to preoperatively, and an increase in stroke volume and cardiac output (CO) during exercise. In patients with decreased MVA, LV reverse remodelling was absent and myocardial flow reserve limited. Patients with decreased exercise MVA had a higher increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) with respect to CO and worse survival 36 months after the study visit (69 +/- 19% vs. 92 +/- 5%, P= 0.005).Conclusions Both increased and decreased MVA were observed during exercise echocardiography after RMA for functional MR. Change in MVA was related to the extent of LV geometrical and functional changes. A decreased MVA during exercise was associated with a higher increase in mean PAP with respect to CO, and worse survival. Show less
Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device has been proposed to correct secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Recently, the results of two randomized controlled trials, that is... Show morePercutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip device has been proposed to correct secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Recently, the results of two randomized controlled trials, that is MITRA-FR (Percutaneous Repair with the MitraClip Device for Severe Functional/Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) and COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation), assessing the efficacy and safety of MitraClip in patients with systolic heart failure and severe secondary MR were published. A priori, these two trials targeted the same patient populations with the same disease using the same device but the results of these trials were diametrically opposed, MITRA-FR being neutral and COAPT being highly positive with respect to efficacy of the MitraClip procedure. The objectives of this viewpoint are: (i) to highlight not only the similarities but also the differences between MITRA-FR and COAPT, which may explain the strikingly different results and conclusions between these two trials and (ii) to derive from these results, implications with regards to the application of the MitraClip procedure in clinical practice. Show less
