Remifentanil has been associated with increased acute and potentially chronic postoperative pain. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to investigate the influence of... Show moreRemifentanil has been associated with increased acute and potentially chronic postoperative pain. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to investigate the influence of intraoperative remifentanil on acute and chronic postoperative pain after cardiac surgery.\nPatients (N = 126) receiving standardized anesthesia with propofol and intermittent intravenous fentanyl at predetermined times for cardiac surgery were randomized to intraoperatively receive either a continuous remifentanil infusion or additional intermittent intraoperative fentanyl as needed. The primary endpoint was chronic thoracic pain at 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints were pain at 3 and 6 months after surgery and analgesic requirements and pain levels in the first 72 hours.\nThere was no significant difference in incidence of chronic thoracic pain between the remifentanil and fentanyl groups, respectively (20% vs. 18%; P = 0.817). At 3 months, however, significantly more patients in the remifentanil group reported chronic thoracic pain (51% vs. 33%; P = 0.047). This effect was more pronounced in younger patients and in patients receiving a higher dose of remifentanil (both P < 0.05). The first 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, morphine consumption in the remifentanil group was significantly higher than in the fentanyl group (34.3 mg [interquartile range (IQR) 25.3 to 48.2] vs. 30.2 mg [IQR 19.2 to 38.1], P = 0.028; and 46.8 mg [IQR 33.8 to 59.2] vs. 39.0 mg [IQR 6.2 to 51.4], P = 0.047, respectively).\nIntraoperative use of remifentanil during cardiac surgery does not impact chronic postoperative pain 1 year after surgery. Nevertheless, remifentanil increases analgesic requirements and thoracic pain until 3 months after surgery, and its use is therefore less favorable during cardiac surgery.\nBACKGROUND\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSIONS Show less
It is not straightforward to simultaneously evaluate benefits and harms of pain management, as different drugs may possess different analgesia and adverse effect profiles. Utility functions,... Show moreIt is not straightforward to simultaneously evaluate benefits and harms of pain management, as different drugs may possess different analgesia and adverse effect profiles. Utility functions, derived from the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of individual outcome parameters, have been constructed to address this problem. Here we construct "pragmatic" utility functions based on measurements of benefit and harms, but without making assumptions about the underlying pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Using data from two previous studies, utility functions were designed by estimating the probability of occurrence of benefit and harm and combining these into one function. Study 1 was a clinical trial on the effect of oral pregabalin on pain relief in chronic pancreatitis patients, with end-points analgesia and dizziness monitored for 21 days. Study 2 was an experimental study on the effect of intravenous fentanyl on antinociception and respiratory depression in healthy volunteers. From study 1 the utility function was negative the first week of treatment, indicative of the greater probability of dizziness than analgesia, but positive thereafter. From study 2 the utility function showed a nadir 30 minutes after dosing, after which the probability function slowly increased towards zero. A pragmatic utility function based on the probability of two binary outcomes, analgesia and adverse effect, was successfully constructed using data from two previous studies. Results yielded valuable insights into the utility of treatment and may be highly educative for physicians and may be used in development of potent analgesics with serious side effects Show less
