Background and aims: Elevated triglycerides (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) define a specific lipid profile associated with residual coronary artery disease (CAD) risk... Show moreBackground and aims: Elevated triglycerides (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) define a specific lipid profile associated with residual coronary artery disease (CAD) risk independently of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Aim of the present study was to assess whether TG/ HDL-C ratio, coronary atherosclerosis and their change over time are characterized by a specific lipidomic profiling in stable patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Methods: TG/HDL-C ratio was calculated in 193 patients (57.8 +/- 7.6 years, 115 males) with CCS characterized by clinical, bio-humoral profiles and cardiac imaging. Patient-specific plasma targeted lipidomics was defined through a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) strategy. Patients underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and an individual CTA risk score, combining extent, severity, composition, and location of plaques, was calculated. All patients entered a follow-up (6.39 +/- 1.17 years), including clinical, lipidomics and coronary CTA assessments. Results: Patients were divided in groups according to baseline TG/HDL-C quartiles: IQ (<1.391), IIQ (1.392-2.000), IIIQ (2.001-3.286), and IVQ (>= 3.287). A specific pattern of altered lipids, characterized by reduced plasma levels of cholesterol esters, phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelins, was associated with higher TG/HDL-C both at baseline and follow-up (IVQ vs IQ). The CTA risk score increased over time and this lipid signature was also associated with higher CTA score at follow-up. Conclusions: In stable CCS, a specific lipidomic signature identifies those patients with higher TG/HDL- C ratio and higher CTA score over time, suggesting possible molecular pathways of residual CAD risk not tackled by current optimal medical treatments. Show less
Aim This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population... Show moreAim This study aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different non-invasive imaging-guided strategies for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a European population of patients from the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) study. Methods and results Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in 350 patients (209 males, mean age 59 +/- 9 years) with symptoms of suspected stable CAD undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and at least one cardiac imaging stress-test prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and in whom imaging exams were analysed at dedicated core laboratories. Stand-alone stress-tests or combined non-invasive strategies, when the first exam was uncertain, were compared. The diagnostic end-point was obstructive CAD defined as > 50% stenosis at quantitative ICA in the left main or at least one major coronary vessel. Effectiveness was defined as the percentage of correct diagnosis (cd) and costs were calculated using country-specific reimbursements. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were obtained using per-patient data and considering "no-imaging" as reference. The overall prevalence of obstructive CAD was 28%. Strategies combining CTCA followed by stress ECHO, SPECT, PET, or stress CMR followed by CTCA, were all cost-effective. ICERs values indicated cost saving from - 969euro/cd for CMR-CTCA to - 1490euro/cd for CTCA-PET, - 3092euro/cd for CTCA-SPECT and - 3776euro/cd for CTCA-ECHO. Similarly when considering early revascularization as effectiveness measure. Conclusion In patients with suspected stable CAD and low prevalence of disease, combined non-invasive strategies with CTCA and stress-imaging are cost-effective as gatekeepers to ICA and to select candidates for early revascularization. Show less
Liga, R.; Vontobel, J.; Rovai, D.; Marinelli, M.; Caselli, C.; Pietila, M.; ... ; EVINCI Study Investigators 2016
