In this study, we examine how the two facets of the fear of terrorism—the affectiveand behavioural fears—shift over time. To this end, we use a unique longitudinal dataset of a representative... Show moreIn this study, we examine how the two facets of the fear of terrorism—the affectiveand behavioural fears—shift over time. To this end, we use a unique longitudinal dataset of a representative sample of 755 Dutch respondents, recruited from theLongitudinal Internet Studies for the Social Sciences panel, in the time periodbetween November 2017 and May 2020. We find that the reported affective fear ofterrorism is significantly lower during the COVID‐19 crisis in 2020 than it was in2017. Yet a divergent trend for behavioural fear of terrorism occurred. In spite ofdecreased affective fear of terrorism threats, respondents in 2020 reportedincreased protective and avoidance behaviours, similar to behaviours promoted tostop the spread of COVID‐19. Show less
The field of crisis and disaster studies has proliferated over the past two decades. Attention is bound to grow further as the world negotiates the prolonged challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic. In... Show moreThe field of crisis and disaster studies has proliferated over the past two decades. Attention is bound to grow further as the world negotiates the prolonged challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic. In this review, we provide an overview of the main foci, methods, and research designs employed in the crisis and disaster research fields in the period of 2001-2020. The review documents that the focus and methods used have not changed much over time. Single case studies and exploratory research prevail, the focus has shifted from preparedness to response, and methodological diversity is limited, but gradually increasing. Future challenges are to understand transboundary crisis management and creeping crises. Advancing the field calls for our community to put more effort in drawing lessons beyond the single case to uncover comparable and universal patterns that connect between events or phases, which help to theorize the multifaceted nature of crisis and disaster management. Show less
The field of crisis and disaster studies has proliferated over the past two decades. Attention is bound to grow further as the world negotiates the prolonged challenges of the Covid‐19 pandemic. In... Show moreThe field of crisis and disaster studies has proliferated over the past two decades. Attention is bound to grow further as the world negotiates the prolonged challenges of the Covid‐19 pandemic. In this review, we provide an overview of the main foci, methods, and research designs employed in the crisis and disaster research fields in the period of 2001–2020. The review documents that the focus and methods used have not changed much over time. Single case studies and exploratory research prevail, the focus has shifted from preparedness to response, and methodological diversity is limited, but gradually increasing. Future challenges are to understand transboundary crisis management and creeping crises. Advancing the field calls for our community to put more effort in drawing lessons beyond the single case to uncover comparable and universal patterns that connect between events or phases, which help to theorize the multifaceted nature of crisis and disaster management Show less
Why do some public organizations survive for many decades, whereas others are terminated within a few years? This question of organizational survival has long intrigued public administration... Show moreWhy do some public organizations survive for many decades, whereas others are terminated within a few years? This question of organizational survival has long intrigued public administration scholars. To explain longevity, public administration research has focused on organizational design features and adaptive capacities. The results have been inconclusive. This article explores an additional explanation for survival and demise: the density dependence theory as formulated in the field of organizational ecology. The underlying premise of this theory is that certain environments can only sustain a certain number of similar‐type organizations. A rising number of organizations fuels competition for scarce resources, which inevitably leads to the demise of organizations. Density theory has often been tested in the business literature, but has been rarely applied to public sector organizations. In this article, we test whether this theory can help explain organizational survival in a population of US federal independent public agencies (n = 142). Our results show that density matters. This is good news for public administration research: the inclusion of density boosts the explanatory power of traditional variables such as design and adaptation. Show less
Oratie uitgesproken door Prof.dr. R.A. Boin bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar in de Politieke Wetenschap, in het bijzonder de Studie van Publieke Instituties en Openbaar Bestuur aan de... Show moreOratie uitgesproken door Prof.dr. R.A. Boin bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar in de Politieke Wetenschap, in het bijzonder de Studie van Publieke Instituties en Openbaar Bestuur aan de Universiteit Leiden op maandag 23 oktober 2017 Show less
