Severe secondary MR is known to be associated with a worse prognosis, whilst the effect of reducing MR on prognosis has still been unclear. The question remains what influences the prognosis of... Show moreSevere secondary MR is known to be associated with a worse prognosis, whilst the effect of reducing MR on prognosis has still been unclear. The question remains what influences the prognosis of these patients: is it the LV or the valve (i.e. the MR)? Characterization and risk-stratification of patients with secondary MR therefore remains challenging. Until recently the decision to intervene for secondary MR was based also on the LVEF. However, LVEF is subject to many limitations. Advanced echocardiography, such as speckle tracking echocardiography, from which LVGLS could be derived has shown to be of much more diagnostic and prognostic value in various valvular heart disease and is currently being implemented more in valvular heart disease guidelines. This supports the fact that LVGLS can detect LV dysfunction in an earlier stage and therefore guide physicians to refer patients for intervention before it is too late. Also the mitral valve geometry has an important role in the technical feasibility of intervention, but also could elaborate on which specific transcatheter intervention is more appropriate according to their targets (i.e. leaflets, annulus or sub apparatus). Additionally, multimodality imaging remains key in characterization and quantification of secondary MR and may help further risk-stratification. Show less
Mutluer, F.O.; Velde, N. van der; Voorneveld, J.; Bosch, J.G.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Geest, R.J. van der; ... ; Bosch, A. van den 2021
Background The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current inter-modality agreement of noninvasive clinical intraventricular flow (IVF) assessment with 3 emerging imaging modalities:... Show moreBackground The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current inter-modality agreement of noninvasive clinical intraventricular flow (IVF) assessment with 3 emerging imaging modalities: echocardiographic particle image velocimetry (EPIV), vector flow mapping (VFM), and 4-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow CMR). Methods We performed a systematic literature review in the databases EMBASE, Medline OVID and Cochrane Central for identification of studies evaluating left ventricular (LV) flow patterns using one of these flow visualization modalities. Of the 2224 initially retrieved records, 10 EPIV, 23 VFM, and 25 4D flow CMR studies were included in the final analysis. Results Vortex parameters were more extensively studied with EPIV, while LV energetics and LV transport mechanics were mainly studied with 4D flow CMR, and LV energy loss and vortex circulation were implemented by VFM studies. Pooled normative values are provided for these parameters. The meta- analysis for the values of two vortex morphology parameters, vortex length and vortex depth, failed to reveal a significant change between heart failure patients and healthy controls. Conclusion Agreement between the different modalities studying intraventricular flow is low and different methods of measurement and reporting were used among studies. A multimodality framework with a standardized set of flow parameters is necessary for implementation of noninvasive flow visualization in daily clinical practice. The full potential of noninvasive flow visualization in addition to diagnostics could also include guiding medical or interventional treatment. Show less
Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a complex and still poorly recognized heart disease with a wide spectrum of possible clinical presentations. Despite its reversibility, it is associated with serious... Show moreTakotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a complex and still poorly recognized heart disease with a wide spectrum of possible clinical presentations. Despite its reversibility, it is associated with serious adverse in-hospital events and high complication rates during follow-up. Multimodality imaging is helpful for establishing the diagnosis, guiding therapy, and stratifying prognosis of TTS patients in both the acute and post-acute phase. Echocardiography plays a key role, particularly in the acute care setting, allowing for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function and the identification of the typical apical-midventricular ballooning pattern, as well as the circumferential pattern of wall motion abnormalities. It is also useful in the early detection of complications (i.e. LV outflow tract obstruction, mitral regurgitation, right ventricular involvement, LV thrombi, and pericardial effusion) and monitoring of systolic function recovery. Left ventriculography allows the evaluation of LV function and morphology, identifying the typical TTS patterns when echocardiography is not available or wall motion abnormalities cannot be properly assessed with ultrasound. Cardiac magnetic resonance provides a more comprehensive depiction of cardiac morphology and function and tissue characterization and offers additional value to other imaging modalities for differential diagnosis (myocardial infarction and myocarditis). Coronary computed tomography angiography has a substantial role in the diagnostic workup of patients with acute chest pain and a doubtful TTS diagnosis to rule out other medical conditions. It can be considered as a non-invasive appropriate alternative to coronary angiography in several clinical scenarios. Although the role of nuclear imaging in TTS has not yet been well established, the combination of perfusion and metabolic imaging may provide useful information on myocardial function in both the acute and post-acute phase. Show less
