ObjectiveUS can detect subclinical joint-inflammation in patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA), which is valuable as predictor for RA development. In most research protocols both hands... Show moreObjectiveUS can detect subclinical joint-inflammation in patients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA), which is valuable as predictor for RA development. In most research protocols both hands and forefeet are scanned, but it is unclear if US of the forefeet has additional value for predicting RA, especially since synovial hypertrophy in MTP-joints of healthy individuals is also common. To explore the possibility to omit scanning of the forefeet we determined if US of the forefeet is of additional predictive value for RA-development in CSA patients.MethodsCSA patients of two independent cohorts underwent US of the hands and forefeet. We analysed the association between RA-development and US-positivity for the full US-protocol, the full US-protocol with correction for gray scale (GS)-findings in the forefeet of healthy and the protocol without forefeet.ResultsIn total, 298 CSA patients were studied. In patients with a positive US, subclinical joint-inflammation was mostly present in the hands (90–86%). Only 10–14% of patients had subclinical joint-inflammation solely in the forefeet. US-positivity was associated with inflammatory arthritis development in both cohorts, with HRs 2.6 (95% CI 0.9–7.5) and 3.1 (95% CI 1.5–6.4) for the full protocol, 3.1 (95% CI 1.3–7.7) and 2.7 (95% CI 1.3–5.4) for the full US-protocol with correction, and 3.1 (95% CI 1.4–6.9) and 2.8 (95% CI 1.4–5.6) without the forefeet. AUROCs were equal across both cohorts.ConclusionThe forefeet can be omitted when US is used for the prediction of RA-development in CSA patients. This is due to the finding that subclinical joint-inflammation in the forefeet without concomitant inflammation in the hands is infrequent. Show less
ObjectiveRecently, a genome-wide association study identified an association between RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) and RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 in the Japanese population, especially... Show moreObjectiveRecently, a genome-wide association study identified an association between RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) and RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 in the Japanese population, especially for patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern. We aimed to replicate this association in a European population and test for interaction with MUC5B rs35705950.MethodsIn this genetic case–control association study, patients with RA and ILD and controls with RA and no ILD were included from France, the USA and the Netherlands. Only cases and controls from European genetic ancestries determined by principal components analysis were included in the analyses. RA was defined by the 1987 ACR or 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and ILD by chest high-resolution CT scan, except in the control dataset from the Netherlands, where the absence of ILD was determined by chart review. Patients were genotyped for RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950. Associations were tested using logistic regression adjusted for sex, age at RA onset, age at ILD onset or at certified absence of ILD, tobacco smoking status and country of origin.ResultsAmong the 883 patients included, 322 were RA-ILD cases (36.5%). MUC5B rs35705950 was strongly associated with RA-ILD in all datasets {combined adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% CI 2.1, 3.9], P = 1.1 × 10−11. No association between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and RA-ILD was observed [combined OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.8, 1.6), P = 0.31. No interaction was found between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950 (P = 0.70).ConclusionOur findings did not support a contribution of RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 to the overall RA-ILD susceptibility in the European population. Show less
ObjectivesTo assess disease outcomes after 20 and 12 years of patients with RA or undifferentiated arthritis (UA), treated-to-target in the BeSt and IMPROVED trials.MethodsIn BeSt (inclusion 2000... Show moreObjectivesTo assess disease outcomes after 20 and 12 years of patients with RA or undifferentiated arthritis (UA), treated-to-target in the BeSt and IMPROVED trials.MethodsIn BeSt (inclusion 2000–02, duration 10 years), 508 patients with early RA were randomized to: 1. sequential monotherapy, 2. step-up combination therapy, 3. initial csDMARD combination therapy, 4. initial bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy. The treatment target was low disease activity (DAS ≤ 2.4).In IMPROVED (inclusion 2007–10, duration 5 years), 610 patients with early RA/UA started MTX with prednisone bridging. The treatment target was remission (DAS < 1.6). Patients not in early remission were randomized to 1. csDMARD combination therapy or 2. bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy.Between 2019 and 22, these patients were invited for long-term follow-up.ResultsOne-hundred-fifty-three ex-Best and 282 ex-IMPROVED patients participated in the follow-up study after a median of 12 and 20 years since the study started.In ex-BeSt and ex-IMPROVED patients, the rate of low disease activity was 91%, and 68% were in DAS remission. Median SHS was 14.0 in ex-BeSt (IQR 6.0–32.5; progression since end BeSt 6.0, IQR 2.0–12.5) and 8 in ex-IMPROVED participants (IQR 3–16; progression since end IMPROVED 4, IQR 2–9). Mean HAQ was 0.8 ± 0.6 in ex-BeSt (change since end BeSt: 0.3 ± 0.5) and 0.6 ± 0.6 in ex-IMPROVED participants (change since end IMPROVED: 0.06 ± 0.5).ConclusionAt 12/20 years after treatment started, the majority of RA and UA patients who had been treated to target low DAS or DAS remission were in DAS remission and had limited functional disability. Radiographic damage progression was mild although not completely suppressed. Show less
Takase-Minegishi, K.; Boehringer, S.; Nam, J.L.; Kaneko, Y.; Behrens, F.; Saevarsdottir, S.; ... ; Woude, D. van der 2024
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of bDMARDs in patients with RA with RF/ACPA compared with patients without these autoantibodies.MethodsPrevious systematic literature reviews performed by EULAR... Show moreObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of bDMARDs in patients with RA with RF/ACPA compared with patients without these autoantibodies.MethodsPrevious systematic literature reviews performed by EULAR RA management task forces were searched for qualifying RCTs. RCTs investigating the efficacy of bDMARDs and including both autoantibody-positive (≤80% of total population) and -negative RA patients were eligible. For trials comparing bDMARD+csDMARD vs csDMARD, relative risks (RR) comparing two groups (RF+ vs RF-, ACPA+ vs ACPA-) were calculated for efficacy outcomes for each arm. Subsequently, relative risk ratios (RRRs) were computed, as the ratio of RR of the bDMARD-arm and the RR from the non-bDMARD-arm. Pooled effects were obtained with random effect meta-analyses.ResultsData from 28 eligible RCTs were analysed, pooling 23 studies in three subgroups: six including csDMARD-naive patients, 14 csDMARD-IR and three TNFi-IR patients. In csDMARD-naive and csDMARD-IR patients, seropositivity was not associated with a better response to bDMARDs: pooled 6-month ACR20 RRRs 1.02 (0.88–1.18) and 1.09 (0.90–1.32), respectively. Other outcomes showed no difference between groups either. In TNFi-IR patients, based on three trials, the 6-month ACR20 RRR was 2.28 (1.31–3.95), favoring efficacy in seropositive patients. Other outcomes mostly showed no significant difference between the groups. Based on the mode of action, efficacy was comparable between RF-positive and RF-negative patients for both TNFi and non-TNFi treatment and also for the individual bDMARDs.ConclusionThe effect of bDMARDs is generally comparable in patients with and without RF/ACPA, regardless of the patient population, the mechanism of action or individual drug used. Show less
Khidir, S.J.H.; Krijbolder, D.; Glas, H.K.; Mulligen, E. van; Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der 2024
Objectives ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA differ in underlying risk factors but have a similar clinical presentation at RA diagnosis. It is unknown what the ACPA-associated differences or... Show moreObjectives ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA differ in underlying risk factors but have a similar clinical presentation at RA diagnosis. It is unknown what the ACPA-associated differences or similarities are during the symptomatic at-risk stage of RA, i.e. clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA). To deepen insights into these differences/similarities, we compared the course of symptoms/impairments and subclinical joint inflammation in the CSA phase during progression to inflammatory arthritis (IA) or to CSA resolution.Methods A total of 845 CSA patients were followed for a median of 24 months; 136 patients developed IA and an additional 355/505 patients had resolution of CSA according to rheumatologists. Patient burden (pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, functional disabilities, presenteeism) was assessed at baseline and 4, 12 and 24 months and at IA development. Subclinical joint inflammation in the hands and feet was assessed over time with 1.5T MRI. Linear and Poisson mixed models were used.Results In both ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative patients, patient burden increased towards IA development and decreased towards CSA resolution. However, patient burden was lower in ACPA-positive vs ACPA-negative disease at all timepoints. Conversely, subclinical joint inflammation tended to increase more rapidly during development of ACPA-positive IA [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.52 (95% CI 0.94, 2.47), P = 0.089] and remained higher over time in ACPA-positive CSA patients achieving resolution compared with ACPA-negative patients [IRR 1.52 (95% CI 1.07, 2.15), P = 0.018]. Although correlation coefficients between changes in patient burden and subclinical joint inflammation during progression to IA were weak, they were consistently higher in ACPA-positive than ACPA-negative disease, e.g. rho = 0.29 vs 0.12 for functional disabilities.Conclusion During RA development and CSA resolution, ACPA-positive CSA patients have lower patient burden but more subclinical joint inflammation than ACPA-negative CSA patients. These data strengthen the notion that the development of ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA is pathophysiologically different and encourage further research on these differences. Show less
In this thesis we describe the concerns and opportunities related to discontinuation of anti rheumatic treatment, in particular, glucocorticoids. We also have focused on treatment of RA patients... Show moreIn this thesis we describe the concerns and opportunities related to discontinuation of anti rheumatic treatment, in particular, glucocorticoids. We also have focused on treatment of RA patients during a (viral) pandemic (COVID19). Show less
Manaï, M.; Middendorp, H. van; Pol, J.A. van der; Allaart, C.F.; Dusseldorp, E.; Veldhuijzen, D.S.; ... ; Evers, A.W.M. 2024
Medication regimens using conditioning via variable reinforcement have shown similar or improved therapeutic effects as full pharmacological treatment, but evidence in patient populations is scarce... Show moreMedication regimens using conditioning via variable reinforcement have shown similar or improved therapeutic effects as full pharmacological treatment, but evidence in patient populations is scarce. This proof-of-principle double-blind randomized clinical trial examined whether treatment effects in recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be optimized through pharmacological conditioning. After four months of standardized treatment (n = 46), patients in clinical remission (n = 19) were randomized to the Control group (C), continuing standardized treatment (n = 8), or the Pharmacological Conditioning (PC) group, receiving variable treatment according to conditioning principles (n = 11). After eight months, treatment was tapered and discontinued linearly (C) or variably (PC). Standard treatment led to large improvements in disease activity and HRQoL in both groups. The groups did not differ in the percentage of drug-free clinical remission obtained after conditioning or continued standard treatment. The PC group did show a larger decrease in self-reported disease activity (Cohen's d = 0.9) and a smaller increase in TNF-alpha levels (Cohen's d = 0.7) than the C group. During all phases, more differences between groups were found for the patients who followed protocol than for the intention-to-treat sample. Although the results are not conclusive, pharmacological conditioning may have some advantages in terms of disease progression and stability, especially during the conditioning phase, compared with standard clinical treatment. The effects may be particularly beneficial for patients who show a good initial response to increased medication dosages. Show less
Winchow, L.L.; Tikly, M.; Musenge, E.; Chopra, A.; Huizinga, T.W.J.; Salomon-Escoto, K.; ... ; Govind, N. 2023
Background: We investigated sensitivity to change of three scoring methods of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) in relation to change in disease activity in patients with active rheumatoid... Show moreBackground: We investigated sensitivity to change of three scoring methods of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) in relation to change in disease activity in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Patients and Methods: Adult RA-patients with complete data in the Measurement of Efficacy of Treatment in the Era of Outcome in Rheumatology database with respect to the 20 HAQ questions and disease activity score with 28-joint count using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) for 2 visits, at least 6-12 months apart, and high disease activity (DAS28-ESR >5.1) at visit 1. Changes in HAQ scored by the (1) conventional method (HAQ-8), (2) HAQ-Tomlin method (HAQ-T), and (3) HAQ-20-item method (HAQ-20) were analyzed in relation to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) RA response criteria, dichotomized to good/moderate and no response.Results: In 421 patients, mean standard deviation (SD) DAS28-ESR declined significantly (6.1 [0.8]-4.8 [1.6], P < 0.0001), over a mean period (SD) of 8.7 (1.9) months. Median HAQ scores improved by all three scoring methods, HAQ-8 (1.6-1.4); HAQ-T (1.2-0.7); and HAQ-20 (1.2-0.9) with similar effect sizes of 0.97, 0.96, and 0.95, respectively. The proportion who achieved a HAQ minimally clinically important improvement (MCII) of >= 0.22 was significantly higher in 47% of patients with EULAR good/moderate score compared to the no response patients (64% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001). Good/moderate EULAR response, higher baseline DAS28, and higher baseline HAQ (7.11, 1.55, and 1.06, respectively) were independent predictors of achieving a HAQ-MCII.Conclusion: Three HAQ scoring methods performed similarly in sensitivity to change with no advantage of alternative scoring methods compared to the conventional HAQ-8 method. A good/moderate EULAR response, despite long disease duration, was associated with a significant likelihood of achieving a HAQ-MCII. Show less
Boeren, A.M.P.; Khidir, S.J.H.; Jong, P.H.P. de; Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der; Mulligen, E. van 2023
ObjectivePatients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) are at risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These patients often report joint swelling while this is not objectified by physical... Show moreObjectivePatients with clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA) are at risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). These patients often report joint swelling while this is not objectified by physical examination. To explore the value of patient-reported swelling in CSA, we aimed to determine its association with subclinical joint inflammation on imaging and RA development.MethodsIn two independent, similarly designed CSA cohorts from the Netherlands, symptomatic patients at risk for RA were studied. At baseline, patients indicated whether they had experienced swelling in hand joints. Subclinical joint inflammation was assessed with MRI or US. Patients were followed for inflammatory arthritis development.ResultsIn total, 534 CSA patients from two independent cohorts were studied, and patient-reported swelling was present in 57% in cohort 1 and in 43% in cohort 2. In both cohorts patient-reported swelling was associated with subclinical joint inflammation. Using MRI, it associated specifically with tenosynovitis (odds ratio [OR] 3.7 [95% CI: 2.0, 6.9]) and when using US with synovitis (OR 2.3 [95% CI: 1.04, 5.3]). CSA patients with self-reported swelling at baseline developed arthritis more often, with hazard ratios of 3.7 (95% CI: 2.0, 6.9) and 3.4 (95% CI: 1.4, 8.4) in cohort 1 and 2, respectively. This was independent of clinical predictors (e.g. morning stiffness), autoantibody positivity and US-detected subclinical joint inflammation. However, when corrected for MRI-detected subclinical joint inflammation, self-reported swelling was no longer an independent predictor.ConclusionPatient-reported joint swelling in CSA relates to subclinical joint inflammation and is an independent risk factor for RA development, but it is less predictive than the presence of MRI-detected subclinical joint inflammation. Show less
Fleischmann, R.M.; Heijde, D. van der; Strand, V.; Atsumi, T.; Mcinnes, I.B.; Takeuchi, T.; ... ; Weinblatt, M.E. 2023
Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of otilimab, an antigranulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.Methods Two phase 3,... Show moreObjectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of otilimab, an antigranulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.Methods Two phase 3, double-blind randomised controlled trials including patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (contRAst 1) or conventional synthetic/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cs/bDMARDs; contRAst 2). Patients received background csDMARDs. Through a testing hierarchy, subcutaneous otilimab (90/150 mg once weekly) was compared with placebo for week 12 endpoints (after which, patients receiving placebo switched to active interventions) or oral tofacitinib (5 mg two times per day) for week 24 endpoints. Primary endpoint: proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology response ≥20% (ACR20) at week 12.Results The intention-to-treat populations comprised 1537 (contRAst 1) and 1625 (contRAst 2) patients. Primary endpoint: proportions of ACR20 responders were statistically significantly greater with otilimab 90 mg and 150 mg vs placebo in contRAst 1 (54.7% (p=0.0023) and 50.9% (p=0.0362) vs 41.7%) and contRAst 2 (54.9% (p<0.0001) and 54.5% (p<0.0001) vs 32.5%). Secondary endpoints: in both trials, compared with placebo, otilimab increased the proportion of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) responders (not significant for otilimab 150 mg in contRAst 1), and reduced Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores. Benefits with tofacitinib were consistently greater than with otilimab across multiple endpoints. Safety outcomes were similar across treatment groups.Conclusions Although otilimab demonstrated superiority to placebo in ACR20, CDAI LDA and HAQ-DI, improved symptoms, and had an acceptable safety profile, it was inferior to tofacitinib. Show less
Mayboroda, O.A.; Lageveen-Kammeijer, G.S.M.; Wuhrer, M.; Dolhain, R.J.E.M. 2023
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) Is a highly prevalent autoimmune disease that affects the joints but also various other organs. The disease is characterized by autoantibodies that are often already... Show moreRheumatoid arthritis (RA) Is a highly prevalent autoimmune disease that affects the joints but also various other organs. The disease is characterized by autoantibodies that are often already observed pre-disease. Since the 1980s, it has been known that antibody glycosylation is different in RA as compared to control individuals. While the literature on glycosylation changes in RA is dominated by reports on serum or plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG), our recent studies have indicated that the glycosylation changes observed for immunoglobulin A (IgA) and total serum N-glycome (TSNG) may be similarly prominent, and useful in differentiating between the RA patients and controls, or as a proxy of the disease activity. In this study, we integrated and compared the RA glycosylation signatures of IgG, IgA and TSNG, all determined in the pregnancy-induced amelioration of rheumatoid arthritis (PARA) cohort. We assessed the association of the altered glycosylation patterns with the disease, autoantibody positivity and disease activity. Our analyses indicated a common, composite glycosylation signature of RA that was independent of the autoantibody status. Show less
To detail the unmet clinical and scientific needs in the field of rheumatology. After a 2-year hiatus due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the 22nd annual international Advances in Targeted Therapies... Show moreTo detail the unmet clinical and scientific needs in the field of rheumatology. After a 2-year hiatus due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the 22nd annual international Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting brought together more than 100 leading basic scientists and clinical researchers in rheumatology, immunology, epidemiology, molecular biology and other specialties. Breakout sessions were convened with experts in five rheumatological disease-specific groups including: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and connective tissue diseases (CTDs). In each group, experts were asked to identify and prioritise current unmet needs in clinical and translational research, as well as highlight recent progress in meeting formerly identified unmet needs. Clinical trial design innovation was emphasised across all disease states. Within RA, developing therapies and trials for refractory disease patients remained among the most important identified unmet needs and within lupus and spondyloarthritis the need to account for disease endotypes was highlighted. The RA group also identified the need to better understand the natural history of RA, pre-RA states and the need ultimately for precision medicine. In CTD generally, experts focused on the need to better identify molecular, cellular and clinical signals of early and undifferentiated disease in order to identify novel drug targets. There remains a strong need to develop therapies and therapeutic strategies for those with treatment-refractory disease. Increasingly it is clear that we need to better understand the natural history of these diseases, including their 'predisease' states, and identify molecular signatures, including at a tissue level, which can facilitate disease diagnosis and treatment. As these unmet needs in the field of rheumatic diseases have been identified based on consensus of expert clinicians and scientists in the field, this document may serve individual researchers, institutions and industry to help prioritise their scientific activities. Show less
D'Onofrio, B.; Helm-van Mil, A. van der; Huizinga, T.W.J.; Mulligen, E. van 2022
Introduction: Drug-free remission (DFR) and its maintenance have been defined as the most desirable outcome for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. DFR is linked to resolution of arthritis-related... Show moreIntroduction: Drug-free remission (DFR) and its maintenance have been defined as the most desirable outcome for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. DFR is linked to resolution of arthritis-related symptoms and restoration of normal functioning. However, there is currently no consensus if an optimal strategy, upon the initiation of treatment to the proper drugs withdrawal, is enough to induce it, or whether it is a predetermined condition related to patients' intrinsic characteristics. Areas covered: This review focuses on two key concepts around DFR. First, we analyze patients' intrinsic factors that may increase the chance of DFR, regardless of therapeutic choices. Second, we discuss on the evidence that it can be induced thanks to adequate, extrinsic disease management. Finally, we provide a glimpse into consequences of drugs discontinuation .Expert opinion: The early initiation of DMARD and the subsequent strict monitoring and drug adjustments are of primary importance to allow patients to achieve DFR, irrespective of initial treatment strategy. Once remission is obtained and maintained, it is possible to gradually taper and discontinue drugs with no dramatic consequences on the disease course. Among those who stop medication, ACPA-negative patients more often maintain the remission. Thus, DFR might depend on a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Show less
Kerschbaumer, A.; Sepriano, A.; Bergstra, S.A.; Smolen, J.S.; Heijde, D. van der; Caporali, R.; ... ; Landewe, R.B.M. 2022
Objectives:To update the evidence on efficacy of DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) and inform the taskforce of the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology... Show moreObjectives:To update the evidence on efficacy of DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) and inform the taskforce of the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods:This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated the efficacy of conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), biosimilar and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs in patients with RA. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science were used to identify all relevant articles published since the previous update in 2019 to 14 January 2022. Results: Of 8969 search results, 169 articles were selected for detailed review and 47 were finally included. Trials investigated the efficacy of csDMARDs, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, DMARD switching, tapering and trials investigating different treatment strategies. The compounds investigated were csDMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), bDMARDs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, denosumab, etanercept, infliximab, levilimab, olokizumab, opineracept, rituximab, sarilumab, tocilizumab) and tsDMARDs (baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib). The efficacy of csDMARDs+ short-term glucocorticoids in early RA was confirmed and similar to bDMARD+MTX combination therapy. Interleukin-6 pathway inhibition was effective in trials on olokizumab and levilimab. Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was efficacious in different patient populations. After insufficient response to JAKi, patients could respond to TNFi treatment. Tapering of DMARDs was feasible for a proportion of patients, who were able to taper therapy while remaining in low disease activity or remission. Conclusion: The results of this SLR, together with one SLR on safety of DMARD and one on glucocorticoids, informed the taskforce of the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for pharmacological management of RA. Show less
Background: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the... Show moreBackground: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6R alpha antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway. Methods: A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document. Results: The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring. Conclusions: The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers. Show less
Khidir, S.J.H.; Boeren, A.M.P.; Boonen, A.; Jong, P.H.P. de; Mulligen, E. van; Helm-van Mil, A.H.M. van der 2022
Objectives: Cross-sectional studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis is more prevalent among people with a lower educational attainment. No longitudinal data are present on educational... Show moreObjectives: Cross-sectional studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis is more prevalent among people with a lower educational attainment. No longitudinal data are present on educational attainment in the at-risk phase of clinically suspect arthralgia (CSA). We therefore analysed the association between educational attainment and progression from CSA to inflammatory arthritis (IA), and performed mediation analysis with subclinical joint inflammation to elucidate pathways of this association. Methods: A total of 521 consecutive patients presenting with CSA were followed for IA development during median 25 months. Educational attainment was defined as low (lower secondary vocational education), intermediate or high (college/university education). Subclinical inflammation in hand and foot joints was measured at presentation with contrast enhanced 1.5 T-MRI. Cox-regression was used to analyse IA development per educational attainment. A three-step mediation analysis evaluated whether subclinical joint inflammation was intermediary in the path between educational attainment and IA development, before and after age correction. Association between educational attainment and IA development was verified in an independent CSA cohort. Results: Low educational attainment was associated with increased IA development (HR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.27, 4.33, P = 0.006), independent of BMI and current smoking status (yes/no). Moreover, patients with a low educational attainment had higher levels of subclinical inflammation, which also was associated with IA development. Partial mediation effect of subclinical inflammation was observed in the relationship between education and IA development. Low educational attainment was also associated with increased IA development in the validation cohort (HR = 5.72, 95% CI = 1.36, 24.08, P = 0.017). Conclusion: This is the first study providing evidence that lower educational attainment is associated with a higher risk of progressing from arthralgia to IA. This effect was partially mediated by subclinical joint inflammation. Show less
Multivalent scaffolds that carry multiple molecules with immunophenotyping or immunomodulatory properties areinvaluable tools for studying and modulating specific functions ofhuman immune responses... Show moreMultivalent scaffolds that carry multiple molecules with immunophenotyping or immunomodulatory properties areinvaluable tools for studying and modulating specific functions ofhuman immune responses. So far, streptavidin-biotin-basedtetramers have been widely used for B-cell immunophenotypingpurposes. However, the utility of these tetramers is limited by theirtetravalency, the inherent immunogenicity of streptavidin (abacterial protein that can potentially be recognized by B cells),and the limited feasibility to functionalize these reagents. This has rendered tetramers suboptimal for studying rare, in particular,antigen-specific B-cell populations in the context of clinical applications. Here, we used polyisocyanopeptides (PICs), multivalentpolymeric scaffolds functionalized with around 50 peptide antigens, to detect autoreactive B cells in the peripheral blood of patientswith rheumatoid arthritis. To explore the potential immunomodulatory functionalities, we functionalized PICs with autoantigenicpeptides and a trisaccharide CD22 ligand to inhibit autoreactive B-cell activation through interference with the B-cell receptoractivation pathway, as evidenced by reduced phospho-Syk expression upon PIC binding. Given the possibilities to functionalizePICs, our data demonstrate that the modular and versatile character of PIC scaffolds makes them promising candidates for futureclinical applications in B-cell-mediated diseases Show less
OBJECTIVEThe authors’ objective was to evaluate the association of the Disease Activity Score (DAS) with cervical spine deformity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients during 10-year optimal... Show moreOBJECTIVEThe authors’ objective was to evaluate the association of the Disease Activity Score (DAS) with cervical spine deformity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients during 10-year optimal treatment of systemic disease.METHODSThe authors evaluated radiological and 10-year follow-up (FU) data of the BeSt (BehandelStrategien) trial. In 272 RA patients, atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS), presence of vertical translocation (VT), and subaxial subluxation (SAS) were evaluated. The associations of these deformities with DAS, self-assessed health (determined with the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]), and erosions of the hands and feet (Sharp–Van der Heijde score) were studied.RESULTSAfter 10 years of FU, AAS (> 2 mm neutral position) was observed in 62 patients (23%), AAS (≥ 3 mm in flexion) in 24%, AAS (≥ 5 mm in flexion) in 7%, VT did not occur, and SAS was present in 60 patients (22%). In total, 135 patients (50%) were in remission (DAS < 1.6) at 10 years of FU. No association could be established between AAS and DAS. Patients with cervical spine deformity (AAS > 2 mm and/or SAS) at 10 years had a higher HAQ score at 10 years than patients without cervical spine deformity (HAQ scores of 0.65 and 0.51, respectively, p = 0.04; 95% CI –0.29 to 0.00).CONCLUSIONSEven though 50% of patients were in remission after 10 years and the BeSt trial was designed to optimize treatment, 40% of patients developed at least mild RA-associated cervical spine deformity and 7% developed significant AAS. This indicates that even in this era of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologicals, cervical deformity is prevalent among patients with RA and should not be neglected in patient treatment plans and information. Show less
Tanaka, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Kato, D.; Kaneko, Y.; Fukuda, M.; Izutsu, H.; ... ; Heijde, D. van der 2022
Objective To determine the efficacy of peficitinib in reducing joint damage and predictive factors affecting treatment response in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods This post hoc... Show moreObjective To determine the efficacy of peficitinib in reducing joint damage and predictive factors affecting treatment response in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods This post hoc analysis used data from a placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (RAJ4) of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate. Erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed at baseline and at Week 28/early termination of treatment using the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method. A univariate logistic regression analysis of change from baseline in a modified total Sharp score identified predictive factors with significant treatment interaction; the effects of these factors on treatment response were further evaluated using a multivariate model. Results The analyses included 481 patients. For most joint groups, peficitinib demonstrated a reduced change from baseline at Week 28/early termination in erosion and JSN scores versus placebo; a numerically greater effect was observed with peficitinib 150 mg versus 100 mg. Baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and prednisolone dose were identified as clinically significant negative predictive factors: the treatment effect decreased as CRP or prednisolone dose increased for both peficitinib doses. Conclusions Peficitinib 100 mg and 150 mg reduced joint damage versus placebo, across almost all joint groups. Higher baseline CRP and/or prednisolone dose were associated with reduced peficitinib efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02305849 Show less
Tanaka, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Kato, D.; Kaneko, Y.; Fukuda, M.; Izutsu, H.; ... ; Heijde, D. van der 2022
ObjectiveTo determine the efficacy of peficitinib in reducing joint damage and predictive factors affecting treatment response in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsThis post hoc an... Show moreObjectiveTo determine the efficacy of peficitinib in reducing joint damage and predictive factors affecting treatment response in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsThis post hoc analysis used data from a placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (RAJ4) of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate. Erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) were assessed at baseline and at Week 28/early termination of treatment using the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method. A univariate logistic regression analysis of change from baseline in a modified total Sharp score identified predictive factors with significant treatment interaction; the effects of these factors on treatment response were further evaluated using a multivariate model.ResultsThe analyses included 481 patients. For most joint groups, peficitinib demonstrated a reduced change from baseline at Week 28/early termination in erosion and JSN scores versus placebo; a numerically greater effect was observed with peficitinib 150 mg versus 100 mg. Baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and prednisolone dose were identified as clinically significant negative predictive factors: the treatment effect decreased as CRP or prednisolone dose increased for both peficitinib doses.ConclusionsPeficitinib 100 mg and 150 mg reduced joint damage versus placebo, across almost all joint groups. Higher baseline CRP and/or prednisolone dose were associated with reduced peficitinib efficacy. Show less
