Background: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) show a robust relationship with arterial pressure as well as objective and subjective cognitive functioning. In addition, APOE epsilon 4 carriership... Show moreBackground: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) show a robust relationship with arterial pressure as well as objective and subjective cognitive functioning. In addition, APOE epsilon 4 carriership may influence how arterial pressure affects cognitive functioning.Objective: To determine the role of region-specific WMH burden and APOE epsilon 4 carriership on the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cognitive function as well as subjective cognitive decline (SCD).Methods: The sample consisted of 87 cognitively unimpaired middle-aged to older adults aged 50-85. We measured WMH volume for the whole brain, anterior thalamic radiation (ATR), forceps minor, and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). We examined whether WMH burden mediated the relationship between MAP and cognition (i.e., TMT-A score for processing speed; Stroop performance for executive function) as well as SCD (i.e., Frequency of Forgetting (FoF)), and whether APOE epsilon 4 carriership moderated that mediation.Results: WMH burden within SLF mediated the effect of MAP on Stroop performance. Both whole brain and ATR WMH burden mediated the effect of MAP on FoF score. In the MAP-WMH-Stroop relationship, the mediation effect of SLFWMH and the effect of MAP on SLF WMH were significant only in APOE epsilon 4 carriers. In the MAP-WMH-FoF relationship, the effect of MAP on whole brain WMH burden was significant only in epsilon 4 carriers.Conclusion: WMH burden and APOE genotype explain the link between blood pressure and cognitive function and may enable a more accurate assessment of the effect of high blood pressure on cognitive decline and risk for dementia. Show less
Objective To compare the long-term effects of tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban on child outcome at age 2.5-5.5 years.Design The APOSTEL III trial was a multicentre randomised controlled trial... Show moreObjective To compare the long-term effects of tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban on child outcome at age 2.5-5.5 years.Design The APOSTEL III trial was a multicentre randomised controlled trial that compared tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban in 503 women with threatened preterm birth. Neonatal outcomes did not differ between both treatment arms, except for a higher incidence of intubation in the atosiban group.Methods Parents were asked to complete four questionnaires regarding neurodevelopment, executive function, behaviour problems, and general health.Main outcome measures The main long-term outcome measure was a composite of abnormal development at the age of 2.5-5.5 years.Results Of the 426 women eligible for follow-up, 196 (46%) parents returned the questionnaires for 115 children in the nifedipine group and 110 children in the atosiban group. Abnormal development occurred in 32 children (30%) in the nifedipine group and in 38 children (38%) in the atosiban group (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.34). The separate outcomes for neurodevelopment, executive function, behaviour, and general health showed no significant differences between the groups. Sensitivity analysis for all children of the APOSTEL III trial, including a comparison of deceased children, resulted in a higher rate of healthy survival in the nifedipine group (64 versus 54%), but there was no significant difference in the overall mortality rate (5.4 versus 2.7%). There were no significant subgroup effects.Conclusion Outcomes on broad child neurodevelopment, executive function, behaviour, and general health were comparable in both groups. Neither nifedipine nor atosiban can be considered as the preferred treatment for women with threatened preterm birth.Tweetable abstract Nifedipine- and atosiban-exposed children had comparable long-term outcomes, including neurodevelopment, executive function, and behaviour. Show less
