Background. Growth-hormone-producing pituitary adenomas have variable likelihood for biochemical remission (BR). During preoperative counseling, individual estimated surgical likelihoods/risks... Show moreBackground. Growth-hormone-producing pituitary adenomas have variable likelihood for biochemical remission (BR). During preoperative counseling, individual estimated surgical likelihoods/risks should be balanced against alternative (medical) treatments, which is necessary for accurate outcome presentation. Preoperative estimation of BR or total resection (TR) likelihoods have not been reported, resulting in extrapolation of individual outcomes. Aims. To share an innovative outcome reporting paradigm by integrating surgical decision-making, and expected/realized results, resulting from the Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) care path with periodical performance evaluation and care innovation cycle. Methods. Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with acromegaly undergoing surgery (January 2016-December 2020; postoperative follow-up >= 6 months) reporting on both classic, and novel innovative outcome evaluations. Results. Fifty eight patients (66 procedures) were included. Intended TR was achieved in 34/50 procedures, whereas intended debulking was achieved in 15/16 procedures. 38/66 procedures resulted in BR, and 4 procedures resulted in permanent complications. Achieving intended surgical goal was estimated preoperatively as likely in 33 (goal achieved (GA) in 28/33), potentially in 27 (GA in 19/27), and unlikely in 6 procedures (GA in 2/6). Integrated Outcome Square 1 (IOQ1) -intended effect achieved without complications- was achieved in 46/66 patients. Conclusion. Implementation of the developed quality process positively affects preopparticularly in complex patients for whom preoperative chances are not fully reflected by tumor size and KNOSP grade, e.g., reoperations, or other challenging circumstances identified during preoperative counseling. Through repeated evaluations, our own team's reserved. Show less
PurposeTo describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery.MethodsRetrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with... Show morePurposeTo describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery.MethodsRetrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing surgery from 2017 to 2019 at the referral center (RC), prior to surgery being considered a viable treatment option (i.e. PRolaCT study). Demographics and clinical data (type and duration of pretreatment and surgical indications, goals, and outcomes) were collected from patient records. Care trajectories were divided into three phases: (1) diagnosis and initial treatment, (2) endocrine treatment at the RC, and (3) surgical treatment.Results40 patients were included (31 females (77.5%), median age 26.5 (14-63) years. Indications for surgery were dopamine agonist (DA) intolerance (n = 31, 77.5%), resistance (n = 6, 15.0%), and patient/physician preference (n = 3, 7.5%). Patients were pretreated with DA (n = 39 (97.5%)), and surgery (n = 3 (7.5%)). Median disease duration at surgery was 4 (0-27) years. Primary surgical goal was total resection in 38 patients (95.0%), of which biochemical remission was achieved 6 months postoperatively in 23 patients (62.2%), and clinical remission in 6 patients (16.2%), missing data n = 1.ConclusionCare trajectories were highly individualized based on patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the multidisciplinary team's assessment (need for alternative treatment, surgical chances and risks). Most patients were pretreated pharmacologically and had broad variation in timing of referral, undergoing surgery as last-resort treatment predominantly due to DA intolerance. High quality imaging and multidisciplinary consultations with experienced neurosurgeons and endocrinologists enabling treatment tailored to patients' needs were prerequisites for adequate counseling in treatment of patients with prolactinoma. Show less
PurposeTo describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery.MethodsRetrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with... Show morePurposeTo describe care trajectories in patients with prolactinoma, aiming to clarify the rationale for surgery.MethodsRetrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients with prolactinoma undergoing surgery from 2017 to 2019 at the referral center (RC), prior to surgery being considered a viable treatment option (i.e. PRolaCT study). Demographics and clinical data (type and duration of pretreatment and surgical indications, goals, and outcomes) were collected from patient records. Care trajectories were divided into three phases: (1) diagnosis and initial treatment, (2) endocrine treatment at the RC, and (3) surgical treatment.Results40 patients were included (31 females (77.5%), median age 26.5 (14-63) years. Indications for surgery were dopamine agonist (DA) intolerance (n = 31, 77.5%), resistance (n = 6, 15.0%), and patient/physician preference (n = 3, 7.5%). Patients were pretreated with DA (n = 39 (97.5%)), and surgery (n = 3 (7.5%)). Median disease duration at surgery was 4 (0-27) years. Primary surgical goal was total resection in 38 patients (95.0%), of which biochemical remission was achieved 6 months postoperatively in 23 patients (62.2%), and clinical remission in 6 patients (16.2%), missing data n = 1.ConclusionCare trajectories were highly individualized based on patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the multidisciplinary team's assessment (need for alternative treatment, surgical chances and risks). Most patients were pretreated pharmacologically and had broad variation in timing of referral, undergoing surgery as last-resort treatment predominantly due to DA intolerance. High quality imaging and multidisciplinary consultations with experienced neurosurgeons and endocrinologists enabling treatment tailored to patients' needs were prerequisites for adequate counseling in treatment of patients with prolactinoma. Show less
Purpose: To report the first experience of our multidisciplinary team with functional imaging using C-11-methionine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (C-11-methionine PET-CT) co... Show morePurpose: To report the first experience of our multidisciplinary team with functional imaging using C-11-methionine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (C-11-methionine PET-CT) co-registered with MRI (Met-PET/MRICR) in clinical decision making and surgical planning of patients with difficult to treat prolactinoma. Methods: In eighteen patients with prolactinoma, referred to our tertiary referral centre because of intolerance or resistance for dopamine agonists (DA), Met-PET/MRICR was used to aid decision-making regarding therapy. Results: Met-PET/MRICR was positive in 94% of the patients. MRI and Met-PET/MRICR findings were completely concordant in five patients, partially concordant in nine patients, and non-concordant in four patients. In five patients Met-PET/MRICR identified lesion(s) that were retrospectively also visible on MRI. Met-PET/MRICR was false negative in one patient, with a cystic adenoma on conventional MRI. Thirteen patients underwent transsphenoidal surgery, with nine achieving full biochemical remission, two clinical improvement and near normalized prolactin levels, and one patient clinical improvement with significant tumour reduction. Hence, nearly all patients (94%) were considered to have a positive outcome. Permanent complication rate was low. Three patients continued DA, two patients have a wait and scan policy. Conclusion: Met-PET/MRICR can provide additional information to guide multidisciplinary preoperative and intraoperative decision making in selected cases of prolactinoma. This approach resulted in a high remission rate with a low rate of complications in our expert centre. Show less
Purpose Although transient diabetes insipidus (DI) is the most common complication of pituitary surgery, there is no consensus on its definition. Polyuria is the most overt symptoms of DI, but can... Show morePurpose Although transient diabetes insipidus (DI) is the most common complication of pituitary surgery, there is no consensus on its definition. Polyuria is the most overt symptoms of DI, but can also reflect several physiological adaptive mechanisms in the postoperative phase. These may be difficult to distinguish from and might coincide with DI. The difficulty to distinguish DI from other causes of postoperative polyuria might explain the high variation in incidence rates. This limits interpretation of outcomes, in particular complication rates between centers, and may lead to unnecessary treatment. Aim of this review is to determine a pathophysiologically sound and practical definition of DI for uniform outcome evaluations and treatment recommendations. Methods This study incorporates actual data and the experience of our center and combines this with a review of literature on pathophysiological mechanisms and definitions used in clinical studies reporting of postoperative DI. Results The occurrence of excessive thirst and/or hyperosmolality or hypernatremia are the best indicators to discriminate between pathophysiological symptoms and signs of DI and other causes. Urine osmolality distinguishes DI from osmotic diuresis. Conclusions To improve reliability and comparability we propose the following definition for postoperative DI: polyuria (urine production > 300 ml/hour for 3 h) accompanied by a urine specific gravity (USG) < 1.005, and at least one of the following symptoms: excessive thirst, serum osmolality > 300 mosmol/kg, or serum sodium > 145 mmol/L. To prevent unnecessary treatment with desmopressin, we present an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of postoperative DI. Show less
Purpose Surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related... Show morePurpose Surgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related to the preoperative severity of dysfunction is unknown. Methods Systematic review for evidence to provide clinical guidance for timing of surgical decompression of the optic chiasm, and a cohort study of 30 NFMA patients, in whom mean deviation (MD), and severity of visual dysfunction was assessed. Results Systematic review 44 studies were included with a total of 4789 patients. Postoperatively, visual field defects improved in 87.0% of patients, stabilized in 12.8% and worsened in 1.0%. Specific protocols regarding timing of surgery were not reported. Only seven studies (16.7%) reported on either the duration of visual symptoms, or diagnostic, or treatment delay. Cohort study 30 NFMA patients (50% female, 60 eyes, mean age 58.5 +/- 14.8 years), had a median MD of - 5.3 decibel (IQR - 3.1 to - 10.1). MD was strongly correlated with clinical severity (r = - 0.94, P < 0.0001), and were used for severity of defects cut-off values: (1) normal > - 2 dB, (2) mild - 2 dB to - 4 dB, (3) moderate - 4 to - 8 dB, (4) severe - 8 to - 17 dB, (5) very severe < - 17 dB. Conclusion Surgical decompression is highly effective in improving visual function. Uniform, quantitative grading of visual dysfunction was lacking. MD is a promising quantitative outcome measure. We provide recommendations for the evaluation of timing of surgery, considering severity of visual impairment, which will need further validation based on expert clinical practice. Show less
Purpose To assess the reliability and safety of a postsurgical evaluation strategy of adrenal function using CRH stimulation and basal cortisol concentrations after transsphenoidal pituitary... Show morePurpose To assess the reliability and safety of a postsurgical evaluation strategy of adrenal function using CRH stimulation and basal cortisol concentrations after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.Methods Retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery from 2010 to 2017, in whom early postoperative basal cortisol and/or CRH-stimulated cortisol secretion were available, including confirmation of adrenal function during follow-up. Patients with Cushing's disease were excluded. Optimal test performances were assessed using ROC analysis.Results A total of 156 patients were included. Sensitivity and specificity of the CRH test were 78% and 90%, respectively, and 86% and 92% for basal cortisol, respectively, using an optimal cutoff of 220 nmol/L. Eight patients had false-negative test results with the CRH test (normal test but adrenal insufficient at follow-up), and six patients with basal cortisol, the majority of which had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies and fluid imbalances. No clinical adverse events occurred in patients with false-negative test results. The diagnostic performance of a single basal cortisol measurement was superior to the CRH test.Conclusions The early postoperative basal cortisol is a safe and simple measurement to guide (dis)continuation of hydrocortisone replacement. However, disturbing factors, e.g., sodium balance disorders, contraceptives, untreated hypopituitarism, and illness impact the interpretation and in those cases this measure is unreliable. We propose an algorithm in which hydrocortisone replacement at discharge is based on basal cortisol <220 nmol/L on postoperative day 2 or 3 in a stable condition. Show less
