Objective: To investigate factors that cause impairment of hand function in children with an upper Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy (NBPP), we performed an in-depth analysis of tactile hand... Show moreObjective: To investigate factors that cause impairment of hand function in children with an upper Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy (NBPP), we performed an in-depth analysis of tactile hand sensibility, especially the ability to correctly localize a sensory stimulus on their fingers.Design: A cross-sectional investigation of children with NBPP, compared with healthy controls. The thickest Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofila-ment was pressed on the radial or ulnar part of each fingertip (10 regions), while a screen prevented seeing the hand.Setting: Tertiary referral center for nerve lesions in an academic hospital in The Netherlands. The control group was recruited at their school.Participants: Forty-one children with NBPP (mean age 10.0 y) and 25 controls (mean age 9.5 y; N=41). Interventions: Not applicable.Main Outcomes Measures: Correct localization of the applied stimuli was evaluated, per region, per finger, and per dermatome with a test score. The affected side of the NBPP group was compared with the non-dominant hand of the controls.Results: The ability to localize stimuli on the tips of the fingers in children with an upper NBPP was significantly diminished in all fingers, except for the little finger, as compared with healthy controls. Mean localization scores were 6.6 (thumb) and 6.3 (index finger) in the NBPP group and 7.6 in both fingers for controls (maximum score possible is 8.0). Localization scores were significant lower in regions attributed to dermatomes C6 (P<.001) and C7 (P=.001), but not to C8 (P=.115).Conclusion: Children with an upper NBPP showed a diminished and incorrect ability to localize sensory stimuli to their fingers. This finding is likely 1 of the factors underlying the impairment of hand function and should be addressed with sensory focused therapy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:872-7 & COPY; 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Show less
Objective: To examine patient activation from the start of stroke rehabilitation and its course up until the 6-month follow-up. Design: Inception cohort study with a follow-up of 6 months. Setting:... Show moreObjective: To examine patient activation from the start of stroke rehabilitation and its course up until the 6-month follow-up. Design: Inception cohort study with a follow-up of 6 months. Setting: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation facility. Participants: A total of 478 patients (N=478) with stroke who received inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation, with a median age of 63.0 years (interquartile range, 56.0-70.0 years) with 308 (64.2%) being men. The study was completed by 439 patients (91.8%). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Patient activation was measured with the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) (score 0-100, 4 levels, where a higher score and level denotes more patient activation). The PAM was measured at the start of the rehabilitation (baseline) and 3 and 6 months thereafter and was analyzed using the multivariate mixed model analysis. Results: At baseline, the mean PAM score was 60.2 +/- 14.3, with the number of patients in PAM levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 being 76 (17.8%), 85 (19.9%), 177 (41.4%), and 90 (21.0%), respectively. The multivariate mixed-model analysis demonstrated that the PAM score increased over time (baseline 60.2 +/- 14.3 vs 3 months 60.7 +/- 14.8 vs 6 months 61.9 +/- 18.0; P.007). Between baseline and 6 months, 122 patients (41.4%) remained at the same PAM level, 105 patients (35.6%) increased, and 68 patients (23.1%) decreased. At all time points, > 35% of patients were in level 1 or 2. Conclusions: PAM scores increased slightly over time from the start of rehabilitation up to the 6-month follow-up. However, more than one-third of patients remained at low levels (ie, level 1 and 2) of patient activation, which indicates that specific interventions during rehabilitation to increase patient activation might be of value. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022;103:1360-7 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Show less
Meijeren-Pont, W. van; Tamminga, S.J.; Fiocco, M.; Avila, A.G.; Volker, G.; Janssen, S.M.J.; ... ; Grp 2022
Objective: To examine patient activation from the start of stroke rehabilitation and its course up until the 6-month follow-up. Design: Inception cohort study with a follow-up of 6 months. Setting:... Show moreObjective: To examine patient activation from the start of stroke rehabilitation and its course up until the 6-month follow-up. Design: Inception cohort study with a follow-up of 6 months. Setting: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation facility. Participants: A total of 478 patients (N=478) with stroke who received inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation, with a median age of 63.0 years (interquartile range, 56.0-70.0 years) with 308 (64.2%) being men. The study was completed by 439 patients (91.8%). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Patient activation was measured with the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) (score 0-100, 4 levels, where a higher score and level denotes more patient activation). The PAM was measured at the start of the rehabilitation (baseline) and 3 and 6 months thereafter and was analyzed using the multivariate mixed model analysis. Results: At baseline, the mean PAM score was 60.2 +/- 14.3, with the number of patients in PAM levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 being 76 (17.8%), 85 (19.9%), 177 (41.4%), and 90 (21.0%), respectively. The multivariate mixed-model analysis demonstrated that the PAM score increased over time (baseline 60.2 +/- 14.3 vs 3 months 60.7 +/- 14.8 vs 6 months 61.9 +/- 18.0; P.007). Between baseline and 6 months, 122 patients (41.4%) remained at the same PAM level, 105 patients (35.6%) increased, and 68 patients (23.1%) decreased. At all time points, > 35% of patients were in level 1 or 2. Conclusions: PAM scores increased slightly over time from the start of rehabilitation up to the 6-month follow-up. However, more than one-third of patients remained at low levels (ie, level 1 and 2) of patient activation, which indicates that specific interventions during rehabilitation to increase patient activation might be of value. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022;103:1360-7 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Show less
Munter, L. de; Polinder, S.; Haagsma, J.A.; Kruithof, N.; Ree, C.L.P. van de; Steyerberg, E.W.; Jongh, M. de 2020
Objective: To describe the prevalence and prognostic factors of symptoms of anxiety and depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) after injury in the clinical trauma population.Design:... Show moreObjective: To describe the prevalence and prognostic factors of symptoms of anxiety and depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) after injury in the clinical trauma population.Design: Multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study.Setting: Ten hospitals in Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands.Participants: Four thousand two hundred thirty-nine adult patients (N=4239) admitted due to injury between August 2015 and December 2016.Interventions: Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire at 1 week and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after injury.Main Outcome Measures: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess anxiety and depressive symptoms and the Impact of Event Scale was used to assess PTSS.Results: The prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression decreased from 10% and 12%, respectively, at 1 week after injury to 7% and 7% at 12 months after injury. Acute traumatic stress symptoms were present in 13% at 1 week and PTSS was prevalent in 10% of the participants at 12 months after injury. Strong prognostic factors for poor psychological outcome in multivariable logistic mixed models were preinjury frailty, psychological complaints and nonworking status preinjury, female sex, low educational level, and accident category (ie, traffic accident, work-related accident, or accidents at home compared to sport injuries).Conclusions: Psychological distress is a common health problem during the first year after injury. Important prognostic factors for psychological distress include psychological complaints before injury and frailty. Early recognition of psychological problems after injury could facilitate discussion between caregivers and patients and improve recovery. (C) 2019 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Show less
Kooi, E. van der; Schiemanck, S.K.; NoLlet, F.; Kwakkel, G.; Meijer, J.W.; Port, I.V. de 2017
Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that the MHQ is an internally consistent, valid, and reliable hand function questionnaire in outpatients after stroke, although these results... Show moreConclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that the MHQ is an internally consistent, valid, and reliable hand function questionnaire in outpatients after stroke, although these results need to be further confirmed. (C) 2016 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Show less
Vos, R.C.; Becher, J.G.; Voorman, J.M.; Goiter, J.W.; Eck, M. van; Meeteren, J. van; ... ; PERRIN Study Grp 2016
To examine associations over longitudinal measurements between neuromusculoskeletal function and gross motor capacity in children and youth with cerebral palsy (CP).|A prospective cohort study.... Show moreTo examine associations over longitudinal measurements between neuromusculoskeletal function and gross motor capacity in children and youth with cerebral palsy (CP).|A prospective cohort study.|Rehabilitation departments of university medical centers and rehabilitations centers.|A sample (N=327) consisting of 148 children (aged 5-9y) and 179 youth (aged 11-20y) with CP, Gross Motor Function Classification System level I (n=180), level II (n=44), level III (n=36), level IV (n=34), and level V (n=33).|Not applicable.|Gross motor capacity was assessed with the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 over a period of 2 to 4 years in different age cohorts. Neuromusculoskeletal function included selective motor control (SMC), muscle strength, spasticity, and range of motion (ROM) of the lower extremities.|Multilevel analyses showed that SMC was significantly associated with gross motor capacity in children and youth with CP, showing higher values and a more favorable course of gross motor capacity in those with better SMC. Strength was only associated with gross motor capacity in youth. Reduced ROM of hip (children) and knee extension (youth) and spasticity of the hip adductors (youth) were additionally-but more weakly-associated with lower values and a less favorable course of gross motor capacity.|Results indicate that children and youth with more severely impaired SMC and youth with reduced muscle strength have a less favorable course of gross motor capacity, while spasticity and reduced ROM are less determinative. Show less
Spruit-van Eijk, M.; Zuidema, S.U.; Buijck, B.I.; Koopmans, R.T.; Geurts, A.C. 2012
