The value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission-tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for staging patients with (very) high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is unknown.... Show moreThe value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission-tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for staging patients with (very) high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is unknown. In this study among NMIBC patients referred for RC, FDG-PET/CT detected metastases that were not detected by CT, leading to treatment changes in 10% of patients. However, the use of FDG-PET/CT should be weighed against its disad-vantages, including false-positive lesions. Introduction and Objectives: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is increasingly used in the preoperative staging of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The clinical added value of FDG-PET/CT in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is unknown. In this study, the value of FDG-PET/CT in addition to contrast enhanced (CE)-CT was evaluated in high-risk NMIBC before radical cystec-tomy (RC). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with high risk and very-high risk urothelial NMIBC scheduled for RC in a tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. Patients underwent staging with CE-CT (chest and abdomen/pelvis) and FDG-PET/CT. We assessed the clinical disease stage before and after FDG-PET/CT and the treatment recommendation based on the stage before and after FDG-PET/CT. The accuracy of CT and FDG-PET/CT for identifying metastatic disease was defined by the receiver-operating curve using a reference -standard including histopathology/cytology (if available), imaging and follow-up. Results: A total of 92 patients were identified (median age: 71 years). In 14/92 (15%) patients, FDG-PET/CT detected metastasis (12 suspicious lymph nodes and 4 distant metastases). The disease stage changed in 11/92 (12%) patients based on additional FDG-PET/CT findings. FDG-PET/CT led to a different treatment in 9/92 (10%) patients. According to the reference standard, 25/92 (27%) patients had metastases. The sensitivit y, specificit y and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT was 36%, 93% and 77% respectively, versus 12%, 97% and 74% of CE-CT only. The area under the ROC curve was 0.643 for FDG-PET/CT and 0.545 for CT, P = .036. Conclusion: The addition of FDG-PET/CT to CE-CT imaging changed the treatment in 10% of patients and proved to be a valuable diagnostic tool in a selected subgroup of NMIBC patients scheduled for RC. Show less
Mehra, N.; Kloots, I.; Vlaming, M.; Aluwini, S.; Dewulf, E.; Oprea-Lager, D.E.; ... ; Ausems, M. 2023
Background: Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are... Show moreBackground: Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are not yet well defined.Objective: To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the indication and application of germline and tumour genetic testing in PCa.Design, setting, and participants: The panel consisted of 39 specialists involved in PCa management. We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a virtual consensus meeting.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Consensus was reached if >75% of the panellists chose the same option. Appropriateness was assessed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.Results and limitations: Of the multiple-choice questions, 44% reached consensus. For men without PCa having a relevant family history (familial PCa/BRCA-related hered-itary cancer), follow-up by prostate-specific antigen was considered appropriate. For patients with low-risk localised PCa and a family history of PCa, active surveil-lance was considered appropriate, except in case of the patient being a BRCA2 germ -line pathogenic variant carrier. Germline and tumour genetic testing should not be done for nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive PCa in the absence of a relevant family history of cancer. Tumour genetic testing was deemed most appropriate for the identification of actionable variants, with uncertainty for germline testing. For tumour genetic testing in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, consensus was not reached for the timing and panel composition. The principal limitations are as fol-lows: (1) a number of topics discussed lack scientific evidence, and therefore the recommendations are partly opinion based, and (2) there was a small number of experts per discipline.Conclusions: The outcomes of this Dutch consensus meeting may provide further guidance on genetic counselling and molecular testing related to PCa.Patient summary: A group of Dutch specialists discussed the use of germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, indication of these tests (which patients and when), and impact of these tests on the management and treatment of PCa.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/). Show less
Background: It has been proven that intraoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioguidance is valuable for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions during open... Show moreBackground: It has been proven that intraoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioguidance is valuable for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions during open surgery. Rapid extension of robot-assisted, minimally invasive surgery has increased the need to make PSMA-radioguided surgery (RGS) robot-compliant.Objective: To evaluate whether the miniaturized DROP-IN gamma probe facilitates translation of PSMA-RGS to robotic surgery in men with recurrent PCa.Design, setting, and participants: This prospective feasibility study included 20 patients with up to three pelvic PCa recurrences (nodal or local) on staging PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) after previous curative-intent therapy.Surgical procedure: Robot-assisted PSMA-RGS using the DROP-IN gamma probe was carried out 19-23 h after intravenous injection of (99m)technetium PSMA-Investigation & Surgery (Tc-99m-PSMA-I&S).Measurements: The primary endpoint was the feasibility of robot-assisted PSMA-RGS. Secondary endpoints were a comparison of the radioactive status (positive or negative) of resected specimens and final histopathology results, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response following PSMA-RGS, and complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.Results and limitations: Using the DROP-IN probe, 19/21 (90%) PSMA-avid lesions could be resected robotically. On a per-lesion basis, the sensitivity and specificity of robot-assisted PSMA-RGS was 86% and 100%, respectively. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction of >50% and a complete biochemical response (PSA <0.2 ng/ml) were seen in 12/18 (67%) and 4/18 (22%) patients, respectively. During follow-up of up to 15 mo,* Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 205126988. E-mail address: h.d.barros@nki.nl (H.A. de Barros) Show less
