Background Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) is used to measure fixation of joint prosthesis. This study compared radiation dose and image quality of a digital radiography (DR) RSA system and a... Show moreBackground Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) is used to measure fixation of joint prosthesis. This study compared radiation dose and image quality of a digital radiography (DR) RSA system and a computed radiography (CR) RSA system in a clinical setting. Methods RSA recordings of 24 hips and shoulders were analyzed. We compared two systems: (1) Arcoma T0 with ST-VI image plates and Profect CR-IR 363 reader to (2) AdoraRSA with CXDI-70C wireless DR detectors in a clinical uniplanar RSA set-up with a +/- 20 degrees tube angulation and 35 cm x 43 cm detectors. Effective dose was calculated using dedicated software. Image quality was evaluated using calibration errors as calculated by the RSA software. Results The mean dose for hips was 0.14 (SD 0.04) mSv in the CR system and 0.05 (SD 0.02) mSv in the DR system. The mean dose for shoulders was 0.16 (SD 0.07) mSv in the CR system and 0.09 (SD 0.03) mSv in the DR system. Radiation dose was 64% (p < 0.001) and 43% (p = 0.03) lower in the DR system compared with the CR system for hip and shoulder RSA, respectively. Image quality was better for the DR system with 60-80% less calibration errors compared to the CR system. Conclusion Owing to highly efficient detectors and added filtration at the x-ray tubes, the DR system considerably reduced radiation dose compared with the CR system without compromising image quality. Based on the findings in this study, we recommend replacing CR RSA systems with DR RSA systems. Registration Patients were selected from clinical studies performed on the two systems and approved by the local ethics committee [20060165, M-20100112, M-20070082, M-20110224, and 20070258] and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00408096, NCT01289834, NCT00913679, NCT02311179, and NCT00679120]. Show less
Jurgens-Lahnstein, J.H.; Petersen, E.T.; Laursen, M.; Iversen, C.H.; Kaptein, B.L.; Lindgren, L.; Stilling, M. 2021
Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an accurate and precise radiographic method that can be used to measure micromotion of implants and study joint kinematics in vivo. A calibration cage with... Show moreRadiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an accurate and precise radiographic method that can be used to measure micromotion of implants and study joint kinematics in vivo. A calibration cage with radiopaque markers is used to calibrate the RSA images; however, the thickness (250 mm) of the calibration cage restricts the available area for the patient and equipment during RSA recordings. A thinner calibration cage would increase the recording area, facilitate handling of the cage, and ease integration of the cage with the RSA system. We developed a thinner calibration cage without compromise of accuracy and precision. First, we performed numerical simulations of an RSA system, and showed that the calibration cage thickness could be decreased to 140 mm maintaining accuracy and precision using 40 fiducial and 30 control markers. Second, we constructed a new calibration cage (NRT cage) according to the simulation results. Third, we validated the new calibration cage against two state-of-the-art calibration cages (Umeaa cage and Leiden cage) in a phantom study. All cages performed similar for marker-based analysis, except for y-rotation, where the Umeaa cage (SD = 0.064 mm) was less precise compared to the NRT (SD = 0.038 mm) and Leiden cages (0.042 mm) (p = .01). For model-based analysis the NRT cage had superior precision for translations (SD <= 0.054 mm) over the Leiden cage (SD <= 0.118 mm) and Umeaa cage (SD <= 0.093 mm) (p < .01). The combined study confirmed that the new and thinner calibration cage maintained accuracy and precision at the level of existing thicker calibration cages. Show less
